- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 3/11/25 at 7:27 pm to The Baker
France helped us in our fight against England. And now they are helping defend a member of thew Commonwealth against us.
Posted on 3/11/25 at 7:50 pm to jizzle6609
quote:
How mad would we be if lets say, New York was hit.
The sub isn’t a ballistic missle boat it’s an attack sub. The attack sub isn’t capable of launching nukes. The French only have 4 Ballistic missile boats. US has 18 Ohio class Boomers in comparison.
This post was edited on 3/11/25 at 7:50 pm
Posted on 3/11/25 at 7:51 pm to The Baker
Oh noez..
....not the mighty French!
....not the mighty French!
Posted on 3/11/25 at 7:55 pm to The Baker
The US Navy knew this before it left France.
Posted on 3/11/25 at 7:57 pm to Tchefuncte Tiger
To be fair to the French, militarily and overall they were successful in pacjfying Algeria in the 50s to the early 60s. DeGaulle then gets elected and sells out his own people there.
French Navy, while not as big as the US, is a first rate outfit.
French Navy, while not as big as the US, is a first rate outfit.
Posted on 3/11/25 at 8:00 pm to KiwiHead
quote:
To be fair to the French, militarily and overall they were successful in pacjfying Algeria in the 50s to the early 60s. DeGaulle then gets elected and sells out his own people there. French Navy, while not as big as the US, is a first rate outfit.
When the chips are down, France is pathetic
Posted on 3/11/25 at 8:28 pm to The Baker
Posted on 3/11/25 at 8:39 pm to The Baker
1. We've tracked that sub since it left home port
2. It's not going to launch sitting next to the pier on the surface
3. When it goes back out to sea we will continue to track it
4. Our SSBNs used to also make port visits to Halifax
2. It's not going to launch sitting next to the pier on the surface
3. When it goes back out to sea we will continue to track it
4. Our SSBNs used to also make port visits to Halifax
Posted on 3/11/25 at 8:40 pm to Philzilla
quote:
France is annexing Canada now?
Itd be funny as hell if France used the current tension to try and snatch Quebec back.
Posted on 3/11/25 at 8:47 pm to The Baker
French actually has a word for attack? I would think the term for retreat is very well established .
Posted on 3/11/25 at 8:50 pm to AggieHank86
quote:Yea, I feel pretty confident saying that even though there may not be a Virginia on each of these boats, we know where they are at all times.
Do you really believe that we would waste one of them following a boat from an allied navy? A boat that is not even equipped with nuclear missiles?
France operates five SSNs and four SSBNs. Are we following all of them?
Posted on 3/11/25 at 8:57 pm to ninthward
quote:That is a very different question, and I agree with you that we almost certainly try to keep taps on them.
There is no doubt a Virginia lurking close by.quote:Yea, I feel pretty confident saying that even though there may not be a Virginia on each of these boats, we know where they are at all times.
Do you really believe that we would waste one of them following a boat from an allied navy? A boat that is not even equipped with nuclear missiles?
France operates five SSNs and four SSBNs. Are we following all of them?
It is the notion that there is always a "Virginia lurking close by" that I saw as utter nonsense.
This post was edited on 3/11/25 at 8:59 pm
Posted on 3/11/25 at 9:10 pm to AggieHank86
This is looking more and more like nothing at all, and possibly not even real. This was first "reported" two days ago on Xwitter. Zero news sources have picked it up, not even a mention of it. There are even questions of if the photos are old.
Posted on 3/11/25 at 9:11 pm to The Baker
There to claim the treasure from Oak Island.
Posted on 3/11/25 at 9:15 pm to jizzle6609
quote:
All the savages from Europe moved to America long ago.
It is why they are so soft and cowardly and we are not. I really believe this is true.
They lost staggering amounts of their best fighting aged men in WWI. Im more inclined to blame their downfall on that
Posted on 3/11/25 at 9:24 pm to jizzle6609
quote:
Yawn, you bore me.
You probably hear that a lot. Mainly from guys.
Posted on 3/11/25 at 9:27 pm to udtiger
quote:
Guarantee you there's been two US attack subs tracking that boat since it transited the tip of Greenland
and they had no idea.
Posted on 3/12/25 at 10:04 pm to DownshiftAndFloorIt
Cool
Fact of the matter is the us would’ve pushed France’s shite in in ww1 or ww2 and it wouldn’t have been close.
Our men were superior prior to ww1.
Also, no way any of those coward nations storms a beach like we did. Fact.
Fact of the matter is the us would’ve pushed France’s shite in in ww1 or ww2 and it wouldn’t have been close.
Our men were superior prior to ww1.
Also, no way any of those coward nations storms a beach like we did. Fact.
This post was edited on 3/12/25 at 10:05 pm
Posted on 3/12/25 at 10:52 pm to DarthRebel
There is no doubt we knew.
Popular
Back to top


0










