Started By
Message
locked post

Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Otters Eaten by Orcas Upon Release

Posted on 6/30/17 at 3:52 pm
Posted by Clyde Tipton
Planet Earth
Member since Dec 2007
38727 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 3:52 pm
I was listening to Rush on Wednesday and he talked about this story as if it were true.

quote:

The average cost of rehabilitating a seal after the Exxon Valdez oil spill in Alaska was $80,000. At a special ceremony, two of the most expensively saved animals were released back into the wild amid cheers and applause from onlookers. A minute later, in full view, they were both eaten by a killer whale.


I thought surely there is footage of this, but upon googling I see Snopes and the Washington Post both say the story is fake.

LINK

quote:

Is it true that two oiled seals were rehabilitated at a cost of $80,000 each and upon being released into the wild were promptly eaten by a killer whale? No. This is an urban legend, as explained at Snopes.com. However, it is true that the cost to clean and rehabilitate oiled sea otters was about $80,000 per animal.


Anybody ever hear this story? I don't give snopes or WP much credibility, but I tend to believe them since I find no links to the story or footage of the incident.

For reference: What I imagined...



Show me the truth PT.
This post was edited on 6/30/17 at 3:55 pm
Posted by DawgCountry
Great State of GA
Member since Sep 2012
30541 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 3:55 pm to
Free Willy!!!
Posted by olddawg26
Member since Jan 2013
24573 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 3:55 pm to
quote:

I don't give snopes or WP much credibility, but I tend to believe them since I find no links to the story or footage of the incident.


Still made a thread
Posted by Clyde Tipton
Planet Earth
Member since Dec 2007
38727 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 3:57 pm to
quote:

Still made a thread


That's because I'm open minded enough not to just put blind faith in one side or the other. I seek facts.
Posted by TiptonInSC
Aiken, SC
Member since Dec 2012
18904 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 4:03 pm to
It wouldn't surprise me if it were true. Nature is a bitch.
Posted by rds dc
Member since Jun 2008
19805 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 4:13 pm to
#NeverTrump
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
42520 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 4:18 pm to
quote:

Anybody ever hear this story?

I don't recognize the trappings in this story, but I do remember one story about one seal that was rescued being released and promptly killed by a shark in the Seattle area.

May have been fake news back then too - don't recall the source. Not much was made of it however.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118683 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 4:22 pm to
quote:

Show me the truth PT.


Orcas are are badass.
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
26679 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 4:25 pm to
The real story is the $80,000 cost which is true. The Orca part, while funny and apparently wrong, is just window dressing.

You're saying the Orca part was the most shocking detail to you?
Posted by Clyde Tipton
Planet Earth
Member since Dec 2007
38727 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 4:33 pm to
quote:

You're saying the Orca part was the most shocking detail to you?





Exxon saw the BP fines and probably thought, "We got off easy."
Posted by beerJeep
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2016
34943 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 4:44 pm to
That gif is oddly satisfying.
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 5:08 pm to
quote:

The real story is the $80,000 cost which is true
As long as Exxon paid, who cares?
Posted by 91TIGER
Lafayette
Member since Aug 2006
17690 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 5:43 pm to
The fake news WaPo and Snopes are FOS as usual. I remember the video of a bunch of school children present during the release of the animals (can't remember if they were seals/sea lions) but yeah some of them were chummed up by the Orcas while they were present. They got a dose of nature in living color. I believe he, Rush, had a clip of it on his television show in the early 90's.
Posted by Jax-Tiger
Port Saint Lucie, FL
Member since Jan 2005
24735 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 5:49 pm to
quote:

As long as Exxon paid, who cares?


I guess the people who were damaged by the spill should care, if they spent $80k helping otters while they lost their jobs.

I wonder why it cost $80K? Were they putting these otters up in the Ritz Carlton?

I had an argument with my cousin, who lives in Homer Alaska and is very liberal. We were visiting them in Homer, shortly after the Exxon Valdez matter was settled in the courts. I believe they ended up paying around $3.5B. My cousin was furious that Exxon was not paying more than they were, because there were people who had lost their livelihood, and he thought they should have been compensated more.

My argument was that a lot of the money paid by Exxon was likely wasted. Some of it was probably bribe money. Much of the money didn't go to the people that were damaged, but, instead, a lot of it ended up going to the local political machine and overly generous contracts were awarded to people who were politically connected. The fisherman who was put out of business was probably screwed, but it probably wasn't because Exxon didn't pony up enough money.

This post was edited on 6/30/17 at 5:51 pm
Posted by Ramblin Wreck
Member since Aug 2011
3898 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 5:57 pm to
I'm sure quite a few posters on here received money they didn't deserve from BP. Read a while back an article that referenced how Birmingham was using their BP settlement funds. Really, Birmingham?
Posted by USA Dan
Spanish Fort, AL
Member since Jul 2015
978 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 6:04 pm to
Yes its true. I remember when it happened.
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 6:07 pm to
I know several people who fleeced the BP deal. Sorry frickers as far as I'm concerned. Not only were they not affected financially, they all had plenty of money anyway. Just another boondoggle, that BP deal.
Posted by MoarKilometers
Member since Apr 2015
17882 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 6:09 pm to
quote:

The real story is the $80,000 cost which is true. The Orca part, while funny and apparently wrong, is just window dressing.

Like the entire fiduaciary purpose of civil court isn't to make the victims whole???
Posted by EastBankTiger
A little west of Hoover Dam
Member since Dec 2003
21316 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 6:12 pm to
This thread made me remember Snuffy the seal. R.I.P. LINK
Posted by Evolved Simian
Bushwood Country Club
Member since Sep 2010
20482 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 8:32 pm to
quote:

Really, Birmingham?



Birmingham didn't get any direct BP money. The State of Alabama received a settlement of about a billion dollars and spread it around where they saw fit, including some in Birmingham.

They also used it to fund the state's Medicaid budget for this year.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram