- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Erika Kirk Message: A serious epidemic of dehumanization driving political violence
Posted on 4/29/26 at 8:01 pm to lake chuck fan
Posted on 4/29/26 at 8:01 pm to lake chuck fan
Serious question. Do you understand the difference between subjective and objective???
This is the third post by you where you have used it wrong and it completely takes away from your point
This is the third post by you where you have used it wrong and it completely takes away from your point
0
Posted on 4/29/26 at 8:02 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
And just in case y’all are having trouble connecting dots, calling people “leftists, dems, libs” etc is dehumanizing.
Lol. What about cacahead? It’s gotta he dehumanizing as well, if those you listed are such.
Welp, at least there’s always poo poo face to fall back on. No? What the heckfire.
This post was edited on 4/29/26 at 8:04 pm
Posted on 4/29/26 at 8:52 pm to arktiger28
quote:
Could it also be that her reasons for doing this stem more from wanting to make sure her husband's legacy goes on, more than just a selfish desire for the spotlight? My default position is almost always for a mom to stay at home with her kids (I have sacrificed so my wife could), so I am sympathetic to that argument. But Damn this widow is under an amount of scrutiny that I find truly appalling.
I’m sure that is her reasoning. Personally I don’t think it’s working, and I think it’s likely detrimental to her as well. But yes, i imagine she in good faith intends that.
Posted on 4/29/26 at 9:08 pm to Pettifogger
Why exactly do you think it’s not working?
And why do you think it’s detrimental to her?
My theory is simply that you just don’t really like her, nor did you probably like her husband either. My guess as to the reason why? Again, just a guess, but most likely just because you associate his supporters with Trump supporters, who I presume you don’t like either. My guess as to why you don’t like Trump supporters? Because you don’t like Trump. And I suppose my guess as to why you don’t like Trump? No idea, and I question whether you even do either.
And why do you think it’s detrimental to her?
My theory is simply that you just don’t really like her, nor did you probably like her husband either. My guess as to the reason why? Again, just a guess, but most likely just because you associate his supporters with Trump supporters, who I presume you don’t like either. My guess as to why you don’t like Trump supporters? Because you don’t like Trump. And I suppose my guess as to why you don’t like Trump? No idea, and I question whether you even do either.
Posted on 4/29/26 at 9:20 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
quote:
has he even talked about her? I know this is hard for a simple old woman like you to understand, but not everyone bases their perusal views on what pundits have to say
So Fuentes isnt a pundit? Why did you presume personal connotations and avoid the question?
Do you denounce Nicholas Fuentes, or not?
Posted on 4/29/26 at 9:21 pm to cajunangelle
I listened to Mrs Kirk's monologue this morning and I didn't hear anything she said that was politically outrageous or patently false, seemed like she had some well thought out and insightful views about the current political climate in the USA.
Posted on 4/29/26 at 9:22 pm to cajunangelle
quote:what? of course he is. I like Nick because I agree with him on many issues. I don't agree with Nick on these issues because I like him. I held them long before I knew who he was.
So Fuentes isnt a pundit?
quote:of course not? why would I?
Do you denounce Nicholas Fuentes, or not?
Posted on 4/29/26 at 9:23 pm to Bunk Moreland
Is there anything Erica Kirk could wear that you wouldn't make fun of her to seem so edgy and cute like the rest of the hate filled imbeciles?
Posted on 4/29/26 at 9:28 pm to theballguy
How old are you 12? Pudgy face Vance is funny It's getting old but it's funny..
Erica Kirk Fat isn't as funny as you think it is.
Erica Kirk Fat isn't as funny as you think it is.
Posted on 4/29/26 at 10:02 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
Because shes embarrassing herself
quote:
SDVTiger
Expert opinion here
Might be one of the overall dumbest posters on this site, and that's including the deep blue libs like Cubbies and VOR. At least they form and articulate their own opinions, the next time SDV has an opinion of his own and can post more than a couple sentences that aren't just attacking another poster will be the first.
Just watch, he will literally prove my point for me
Posted on 4/29/26 at 10:09 pm to davyjones
quote:
Why exactly do you think it’s not working?
Because the Internet has a large portions of it that are a lot like junior high. And there’s a bunch of mean girls and low testosterone guys who think it’s edgy to make fun of a widow and then tell you they’re just asking questions.
Posted on 4/29/26 at 10:09 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
And just in case y’all are having trouble connecting dots, calling people “leftists, dems, libs” etc is dehumanizin
Wait, what are you admitting here?
Is "leftist, Dem, lib" not an apt term for someone with ideals that tend to fall on the left side of the political spectrum? So why do you consider that "dehumanizing" like an insult? Is that because morally, deep down, you know it's wrong to have a lot of those ideals and therefore it's an insult to call someone a Democrat?
Damn you just self-owned harder than anyone here ever could've
Posted on 4/29/26 at 10:54 pm to cajunangelle
I'm of the opinion that the TPUSA people knew that the organization effectively died with Charlie. So they attempted something drastic and hit on installing his widow as his successor.
They leaned heavily into Jackie O imagery coupled with a stiff chaser of girlboss entitlement. The optics were on par with the announcing of successors in North Korea.
The problem with the Jackie O optics is that she never stepped into the arena. LBJ did. Bobby Kennedy did too.
The period of relative calm we had in the US (at least with regards to political violence) has been over for at least five years. Erika Kirk is widow with two very young children. She needs to focus on family, stay at home and after an appropriate time, find a new man to lead her family.
They leaned heavily into Jackie O imagery coupled with a stiff chaser of girlboss entitlement. The optics were on par with the announcing of successors in North Korea.
The problem with the Jackie O optics is that she never stepped into the arena. LBJ did. Bobby Kennedy did too.
The period of relative calm we had in the US (at least with regards to political violence) has been over for at least five years. Erika Kirk is widow with two very young children. She needs to focus on family, stay at home and after an appropriate time, find a new man to lead her family.
Posted on 4/29/26 at 11:09 pm to cajunangelle
Tired of this Erika Kirk lady and don’t care about anything she has to say.
Peoples wives assuming their husband’ roles in business and politics gotta go. Just because you frick a person that can do a thing doesn't mean you can do that thing.
That goes for all political persuasions,
professions and walks of life.
Do the thing or stfu. You cant vouch in by who you got to bang you.
Sick of it.
Peoples wives assuming their husband’ roles in business and politics gotta go. Just because you frick a person that can do a thing doesn't mean you can do that thing.
That goes for all political persuasions,
professions and walks of life.
Do the thing or stfu. You cant vouch in by who you got to bang you.
Sick of it.
Posted on 4/29/26 at 11:41 pm to Stat M Repairman
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. 
Also throwing a flag on this for dressing up like temu Erika Elaniak in Under Seige.
Posted on 4/30/26 at 5:09 am to Bronson2017
quote:
Why the frick is she not at home with her kids? Why is she going to that dinner in the first place? She comes off extremely disingenuous and rehearsed.
Why, and I mean this in the nicest way possible, do you actually give a frick?
Posted on 4/30/26 at 5:17 am to cajunangelle
REDACTED.
This post was edited on 4/30/26 at 5:51 am
Posted on 4/30/26 at 6:13 am to Pettifogger
quote:
My gut reaction is the same as SDVs and others. Go raise your kids, heal, etc.
And here response would be: If TPUSA (Charlie's legacy) dies because she was not at the forefront, then the assassin won.
Posted on 4/30/26 at 6:17 am to cajunangelle
quote:
Did you listen to her? Why should she go away?
Honest answer - I think like 98% of Internet personalities should go away.
Few bring salient insights on either side
Of those few its a select few of those that can then package that data/opinion/actionable item into a message both interesting and digestible to the masses
If you are not in that group then you are just contributing to the noise.
Charlie changed people.
Erika feels more like a soap opera than an agent of change. Not solely her fault but certainly partially
Posted on 4/30/26 at 6:20 am to cajunangelle
Going back to some of Charlie's most salient talking points in the past. Seems some are off message these days.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Page 4 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News