Started By
Message

Erickson: Iran Deal is a Bad One

Posted on 6/17/26 at 5:47 pm
Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
58392 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 5:47 pm
Erick Erickson slammed the deal in his newsletter today. Yes, I read the Victor Davis Hanson piece. He made good points as always but curiously did not mention the ballistic missile part.

quote:

The Memorandum of Understanding has now been released by the White House. It was originally read out to conservatives by phone before the text was actually released. This is notable because for three days, the Vice President of the United States and the White House have formally disputed — and loudly disputed — that all of the leaked texts were the Memorandum of Understanding. Now we have the actual Memorandum of Understanding released by the White House, and it turns out all the leaks were true. In other words, for three days, the White House lied and denied that the leaks were the real memo, and it turns out they were. And it is as bad, if not worse, than people thought.

... In fact, one of the key terms of the deal is that the Iranians will be able to spend their $300 billion economic fund on whatever they want, including terrorism, with no restrictions from the United States. Yes, according to the terms of the text of the Memorandum of Understanding, the Iranians will be able to process and use their money for anything they wish according to the Central Bank of Tehran.

Up next, the president said in Europe today, Iran will be able to keep its ballistic missiles. The original purpose of going into Iran when we did was to stop Iran from the ballistic missile program. Allow me to read you some quotes that are deeply relevant to this. Quote, “The United States is conducting an operation to eliminate the threat of Iran’s short-range ballistic missiles. The purpose of this is to destroy that missile capacity. Our mission and our focus is the destruction of their ballistic missile capabilities. I’m telling you what the objective of the operations are. The objectives of the operation are to destroy their ballistic missile capability and make sure they can’t rebuild it and make sure they can’t hide behind that to have a nuclear program. That’s the objective of the mission.” That was Marco Rubio on March 2nd, 2026.

According to the president today, under the terms of the memorandum of understanding, Iran will now get to not only keep but also grow the ballistic missile capability that we said that going into Iran was designed to stop. If you will recall, Marco Rubio argued that they had so many ballistic missiles, they were getting to the point where no defensive systems could protect countries trying to take out Iran’s nuclear missiles. So they had built essentially a ballistic missile shield, where if anyone went in to try to stop their nuclear missile program, Iran had so many ballistic missiles, they could destroy any country and overwhelm their defensive batteries. Now, according to the terms of the deal, Iran will be able to keep that capacity and grow it.


I tend to agree with EE here. The ballistic missiles are a real problem. Iran won't need nukes if it can use its missiles to threaten the whole region, Europe, or even here. Doesn't matter who pays it, they get $300 billion, what do you think they will do with it? Remember, Biden gave them billions and they turned around and used it to fund October 7.

This is a bad deal. period.
This post was edited on 6/17/26 at 5:49 pm
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
42911 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 5:48 pm to
You guys are like a broken record.
Posted by wadewilson
Member since Sep 2009
41773 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 5:48 pm to
Mission accomplished.
Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
58392 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 5:50 pm to
Why? It's true.
Posted by Juan Betanzos
New Orleans
Member since Nov 2005
4282 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 5:50 pm to
Who???
Posted by Bob_Sugar
Member since Mar 2026
179 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 5:52 pm to
Hey Erckson, he also said that if they don't behave, the bombing starts again. Why didn't you mention that, dumb arse????
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91852 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 5:52 pm to
No amount of logic will sway the sycophants here. If Trump does it, it must be good. If Trump tears it up in 2 weeks, it was all part of the plan.
Posted by 91TIGER
Lafayette
Member since Aug 2006
19529 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 5:55 pm to
quote:

Erick Erickson


Never forget, he supported this clown in 2016; !JEB!

Posted by BamaGradinTn
Murfreesboro
Member since Dec 2008
29269 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 5:56 pm to
quote:

Hey Erckson, he also said that if they don't behave, the bombing starts again. Why didn't you mention that, dumb arse????


You mean the bombing that was only supposed to last a few weeks, dumbass?
Posted by OysterPoBoy
City of St. George
Member since Jul 2013
45196 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 6:03 pm to
quote:

Erickson: Iran Deal is a Bad One


It may be. I have no idea.


I do know Erickson is a cuck though.
Posted by Sofaking2
Member since Apr 2023
21603 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 6:05 pm to
Erickson is no Rush for sure.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
478687 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 6:06 pm to
quote:

Mission accomplished.


Unconditional Surrender ™
Posted by Sweep Da Leg
Member since Sep 2013
3977 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 6:07 pm to
Lmao one of the king never trumpets Erick Erickson???

Y’all are sad.
Let me know what Rick Wilson and the Drudge Report thinks next
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
168644 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 6:07 pm to
:blah: neocon EE. I didn't care what he ever thought about anything.
Posted by E Redcoat
Member since Jan 2026
22 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 6:08 pm to
Yes

Hilarious how, like everyone on here, JD did the same routine of first calling it a damned lie, then bending in the familiar humiliation to defend what would have been indefensible only yesterday.

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Posted by LSUbest
Coastal Plain
Member since Aug 2007
16813 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 6:13 pm to
Posted by E Redcoat
Member since Jan 2026
22 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 6:15 pm to
Posted by Stidham8
Member since Aug 2018
10482 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 6:19 pm to
It is a historically bad outcome for the US and will cause a lot of suffering in the future.

Iran came out much stronger than they were before. It’s astonishing. We bombed their military and are signing a document that pays to rebuild it all. Shame on our citizens and leaders.
Posted by jp4lsu
Member since Sep 2016
6898 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 6:33 pm to
Objectives:
-destroy ballistic missile program
-destroy their nuke program
-destroy the govt leadership and have a new govt

Am I right on these objectives?
What have we accomplished exactly?

Now maybe they behave because of fear of attacks from the US again. But they stood their ground this time. Why wouldn't they next time?
This was a blunder. Will we really be able to stop them from producing a nuke?
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
42911 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 6:40 pm to
quote:

E Redcoat


When did you get the activation notice?

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram