re: Does it kind of bother anybody that the dems could probably just jail you if they wanted?

quote:

---

The more this shite with Trump drags out, it’s kind of beginning to dawn on me that if I talk some serious shite about democrats, that they could probably throw me in jail. And then - who would defend me? Would the republicans defend me? I really don’t think they would at this point.

Are they seriously going to just let this shite happen? Where are our representatives in all this?

---

If you're waiting for you fellow Republicans to help you you're going to be waiting a long time

The vast majority would sit idly by and watch their neighbors, friends, and family get hauled off because they're not willing to risk their job, social standing, and "wealth"

They'll try to mask their cowardice as some sort of virtue by saying "I cAn'T dO aNyThiNg, I gOt wOrK tOmoRrOw" but they'll like a few Facebook statuses (so long as they're not too edgy, a potential client might see it and it would cost them money!). The vast majority of Republicans are cowards and will condemn the few that won't sit down keep quiet; they'll label them as some sort of trouble maker.

While not all, but a sizeable enough group of Democrats will show up outside the home of the judge, jurors, projectors etc and the Democrats that were too afraid to go (or just didn't feel like it) will support those that do.

quote:

---

Just as long as Ron doesny attempt a coup or try to sabatage an election or steal top secret documents, he should be ok.

---

That didn’t happen, and Ron won’t have that opportunity.

quote:

---

Juxtapose that thought with Lafayette Park,

---

Whataboutism isn't a very strong rhetoric device, despite its recent popularity.

quote:

---

and the penalties dealt out for it.

---

Perfect example for why my statement above is true.

Congress and Lafayette Park are two VERY different locations with VERY different laws.

quote:

---

That guy that made the memes about voting for Hillary would like a word.

---

They got him with the quickness.

It's just like most of their talking points. Kernal of truth with a mountain of ignorance or shite around it.

I'm sure there's a logical fallacy that applies to this "logic" directly. I just don't know the name of it.

Exact same arguments ITT trying to claim Trump was just speaking, when the indictments involve a LOT of other stuff which are the real backbones of the indictments (regardless of the chances of success on the merits). It's not about Trump's words/speech much at all.

quote:

---

Actually that is EXACTLY what it is.

---

No, it is not. Threatening to kill someone and target their families is not the exact same thing as someone talking shite. Not even close.

quote:

---

Meanwhile, tell the "not someone talking shite" business to Kavanaugh. Tell it to Scalise. Tell it to Lee Keltner. Tell it to Aaron Danielson.

---

The threats for Scalise weren’t overt or targeted. It was a guy who loved Bernie Sanders and couldn’t stand Republicans. That’s not the same thing as possibly seeing it coming.

quote:

---

Photos show Keltner slapped Dolloff in the face while holding a can of bear spray. Dolloff then drew a handgun he had concealed in his waistband and Keltner raised his bear spray. Dolloff shot Keltner as Keltner sprayed the bear repellant at Dolloff.

---

Play stupid fricking games.

What are you talking about with Danielson? Guy was in Portland when groups got mad and went at each other. There weren’t premeditated threats, he was in the wrong place, wrong time. And guess what:

quote:

---

Law enforcement officers fatally shot a man Thursday suspected of killing a backer of a right-wing group in Portland, Oregon, after a caravan of supporters of President Donald Trump rolled into the city last weekend, authorities say.

Michael Forest Reinoehl, 48, was killed in Olympia, Washington, near Lacey as a federal task force tried to arrest him Thursday night, the U.S. Marshals Service said.

---

You are conflating stuff that isn’t comparable at all just to purposely try to confuse.

quote:

---

Her failure to assimilate this case as being different than "any defendant in a criminal case," disposes her as judicially deranged. Her refusal to recuse establishes her as ill-equipped in judgement for the bench under any circumstances, and certainly in this case.

---

And if she recuses, who are you going to find that is impartial in this? Donald Trump isn’t above anyone, but he’s got a bully pulpit, that he uses every single day, to incite a radical following that she has legit reason to believe would act on Trump’s ramblings.

quote:

---

Could it possibly be because it wasn't just about a meme no matter how much you try to trivialize it?

---

That's my point!

They found a law they could bend and stretch in order to cloak their actions under the 'justice' label.

There are thousands of laws out there ripe for abuse.

quote:

---

Useful idiots will be the first to be disposed of before their peers

---

And they'll be screaming "But I helped!! I helped you!!!


Nooooooooooo Donnnnnttttttttt!!!!!!!!!

quote:

---

That's my point!

They found a law they could bend and stretch in order to cloak their actions under the 'justice' label.

There are thousands of laws out there ripe for abuse.

---

They didn't go searching to "find a law" in that situation. Anyone with half a brain can look at that meme and posts with it and see what he was doing probably wasn't legal. Add in the fact that he went through the trouble of actually making the phone number associated with the meme an actual working number and there ya go.

The guy had a decent amount of online presence. Obviously he was trying to grow it more. You draw attention to yourself, you get what you ask for. You skirt/break laws while doing so, well....

quote:

---

They didn't go searching to "find a law" in that situation.

---

exactly! you don't have to look hard, they are everywhere

That's my point again. Thanks!