- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: DJT - We run out of reserves at about 4 weeks...you wanna see bedlam?
Posted on 6/19/26 at 9:07 am to Bunk Moreland
Posted on 6/19/26 at 9:07 am to Bunk Moreland
## 6. Tertiary effects
- **Macro / inflation / Fed.** A sustained $150+ oil is a classic stagflationary supply shock. The Fed faces the worst dilemma — tightening deepens the recession, easing lets a second inflation wave run. Headline CPI re-accelerates; the diesel channel makes it broad, not just energy. USD likely catches a safe-haven bid, stressing EM importers further.
- **Asia is the epicenter.** China, India, Japan, and South Korea take the bulk of Hormuz crude. They bid aggressively for **every** non-Hormuz barrel, **pulling Atlantic-Basin, West African, Latin American, and US crude eastward** — which *worsens* US and European availability and turns a regional closure into a global bidding war. China's strategic reserve becomes a geopolitical variable (release vs. hoard).
- **Global recession ? demand-destruction price collapse.** Every major oil-price spike in modern history preceded a recession; the self-correcting mechanism is brutal — demand breaks, then price collapses (the 2008 path). The "high price" and "recession" outcomes are not alternatives; the first **causes** the second with a lag.
- **Structural / long-run.** Accelerated investment in **Gulf-bypass infrastructure** (Saudi East–West expansion, UAE Fujairah — though Red Sea / Bab-el-Mandeb exposure caps the bypass, the GOGET unmodeled risk), a US shale capex surge (6–12 mo lag), renewed strategic-stockpile competition, and a sharpened energy-security-vs-transition debate.
- **Freight / insurance.** War-risk premiums (Lloyd's) make even *permitted* transits uneconomic; VLCC rates spike — the effective closure is broader than the literal blockade.
- **Military escalation feedback.** Pressure for US/coalition naval action to force the strait open ? escalation spiral ? the scenario feeds *back* into the wider-war premise the whole GOGET framework was built on. This is the tail where the spoke rejoins Path C at its most violent.
-----
## 7. Two-sided resolution & link back to GOGET
The scenario does **not** resolve to a single price — it resolves to one of two regimes, and the variable that decides is **how fast demand breaks relative to how fast buffers empty:**
- **Supply-constrained (buffers empty first):** $160–200+, rationing, export controls, the SPR spent — a months-long siege economy until the strait reopens.
- **Demand-destruction (demand breaks first):** a violent spike ($160–180) that recession then craters — high-then-low, the 2008 shape.
**For the live framework:** this spoke implies the **Path-C midpoint ($130) is conservative for a re-closure *from today's depleted base*.** The first closure had ~415 SPR / ~29 Cushing / fuller commercial to absorb it; a second has Cushing at tank bottoms, SPR -18%, and commercial near strain. The same physical event would therefore reprice **faster and higher** than February did. If a Lebanon-driven collapse (the live C trigger in Rev 8) actually re-closed the strait, the framework's C distribution should arguably be **right-shifted and fatter-tailed** than the current $130 point — something to fold into the next reweight *if* C re-rates.
-----
## 8. Key assumptions & uncertainties
| # | Assumption / unknown | Sensitivity |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Commercial draw ~2.0 mb/d base (vs 1.2 observed) | Drives all timelines; ±50% shifts op-min by weeks |
| 2 | SPR emergency release ~2.0 mb/d sustainable | If only ~1.3 achievable, commercial drains faster |
| 3 | Export-control timing | Earlier curbs slow the draw but worsen the global shortage |
| 4 | Persian Gulf bypass (~3–4 mb/d effective) | Bab-el-Mandeb exposure could cut it toward zero (worse) |
| 5 | Demand-destruction elasticity / lag | Determines which §7 regime wins, and when |
| 6 | Cushing absolute floor (18 vs lower) | Sets the WTI-squeeze severity |
| 7 | Commercial operational minimum (350 band) | Modern system has never tested it — genuine uncertainty |
| 8 | Iranian production already destroyed (~2.85 vs 3.95 baseline) | A re-closure strands the *other* ~13–16 mb/d of Gulf transit on top |
**This is a hypothetical projection, not investment advice.**
**Data sources:** EIA WPSR DOE/EIA-0208(2026-025), week ending Jun 12, 2026 — PADD crude stocks (PADD 1 7.9 / PADD 2 97.8 / Cushing 20.0 / PADD 3 243.8 / PADD 4 23.5 / PADD 5 45.2), commercial 418.2, SPR 340.3, total crude 758.5; flows: production 13.8, crude imports 5.7, crude exports 4.9, net crude imports 0.8, refinery inputs 17.0 @ 96.7%, operable capacity 18.0, net product exports 6.1 (gross 7.8). Pre-closure curve: Brent $79.55 / WTI ~$76 (Jun 17 settle). Operational-minimum bands, draw rates, and all price milestones are stated scenario assumptions.
- **Macro / inflation / Fed.** A sustained $150+ oil is a classic stagflationary supply shock. The Fed faces the worst dilemma — tightening deepens the recession, easing lets a second inflation wave run. Headline CPI re-accelerates; the diesel channel makes it broad, not just energy. USD likely catches a safe-haven bid, stressing EM importers further.
- **Asia is the epicenter.** China, India, Japan, and South Korea take the bulk of Hormuz crude. They bid aggressively for **every** non-Hormuz barrel, **pulling Atlantic-Basin, West African, Latin American, and US crude eastward** — which *worsens* US and European availability and turns a regional closure into a global bidding war. China's strategic reserve becomes a geopolitical variable (release vs. hoard).
- **Global recession ? demand-destruction price collapse.** Every major oil-price spike in modern history preceded a recession; the self-correcting mechanism is brutal — demand breaks, then price collapses (the 2008 path). The "high price" and "recession" outcomes are not alternatives; the first **causes** the second with a lag.
- **Structural / long-run.** Accelerated investment in **Gulf-bypass infrastructure** (Saudi East–West expansion, UAE Fujairah — though Red Sea / Bab-el-Mandeb exposure caps the bypass, the GOGET unmodeled risk), a US shale capex surge (6–12 mo lag), renewed strategic-stockpile competition, and a sharpened energy-security-vs-transition debate.
- **Freight / insurance.** War-risk premiums (Lloyd's) make even *permitted* transits uneconomic; VLCC rates spike — the effective closure is broader than the literal blockade.
- **Military escalation feedback.** Pressure for US/coalition naval action to force the strait open ? escalation spiral ? the scenario feeds *back* into the wider-war premise the whole GOGET framework was built on. This is the tail where the spoke rejoins Path C at its most violent.
-----
## 7. Two-sided resolution & link back to GOGET
The scenario does **not** resolve to a single price — it resolves to one of two regimes, and the variable that decides is **how fast demand breaks relative to how fast buffers empty:**
- **Supply-constrained (buffers empty first):** $160–200+, rationing, export controls, the SPR spent — a months-long siege economy until the strait reopens.
- **Demand-destruction (demand breaks first):** a violent spike ($160–180) that recession then craters — high-then-low, the 2008 shape.
**For the live framework:** this spoke implies the **Path-C midpoint ($130) is conservative for a re-closure *from today's depleted base*.** The first closure had ~415 SPR / ~29 Cushing / fuller commercial to absorb it; a second has Cushing at tank bottoms, SPR -18%, and commercial near strain. The same physical event would therefore reprice **faster and higher** than February did. If a Lebanon-driven collapse (the live C trigger in Rev 8) actually re-closed the strait, the framework's C distribution should arguably be **right-shifted and fatter-tailed** than the current $130 point — something to fold into the next reweight *if* C re-rates.
-----
## 8. Key assumptions & uncertainties
| # | Assumption / unknown | Sensitivity |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Commercial draw ~2.0 mb/d base (vs 1.2 observed) | Drives all timelines; ±50% shifts op-min by weeks |
| 2 | SPR emergency release ~2.0 mb/d sustainable | If only ~1.3 achievable, commercial drains faster |
| 3 | Export-control timing | Earlier curbs slow the draw but worsen the global shortage |
| 4 | Persian Gulf bypass (~3–4 mb/d effective) | Bab-el-Mandeb exposure could cut it toward zero (worse) |
| 5 | Demand-destruction elasticity / lag | Determines which §7 regime wins, and when |
| 6 | Cushing absolute floor (18 vs lower) | Sets the WTI-squeeze severity |
| 7 | Commercial operational minimum (350 band) | Modern system has never tested it — genuine uncertainty |
| 8 | Iranian production already destroyed (~2.85 vs 3.95 baseline) | A re-closure strands the *other* ~13–16 mb/d of Gulf transit on top |
**This is a hypothetical projection, not investment advice.**
**Data sources:** EIA WPSR DOE/EIA-0208(2026-025), week ending Jun 12, 2026 — PADD crude stocks (PADD 1 7.9 / PADD 2 97.8 / Cushing 20.0 / PADD 3 243.8 / PADD 4 23.5 / PADD 5 45.2), commercial 418.2, SPR 340.3, total crude 758.5; flows: production 13.8, crude imports 5.7, crude exports 4.9, net crude imports 0.8, refinery inputs 17.0 @ 96.7%, operable capacity 18.0, net product exports 6.1 (gross 7.8). Pre-closure curve: Brent $79.55 / WTI ~$76 (Jun 17 settle). Operational-minimum bands, draw rates, and all price milestones are stated scenario assumptions.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 9:07 am to Ten Bears
quote:
Yes but we had to eliminate the British Empire. It just had to be done.
I hope this is a troll mocking the Promethean Update retards, who have embarrassed themselves during this war
Posted on 6/19/26 at 9:08 am to deltaland
quote:
Rest of world not so much but they wouldn’t help us with Iran or opening the strait so frick em
The economy is global, like oil prices.
Asia and the EU having their economies crash would cause our economy to crash.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 9:11 am to Decatur
This is a tankie crew you would normally laugh at and Pepe may full of it, but he says Trump got some type of 60 day risk assessment that drove him to the MOU.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 9:36 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
he says Trump got some type of 60 day risk assessment that drove him to the MOU.
I have Claude and could tell you that we have been on a clock. Trump has the US intelligence community so he should know better than anyone.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 9:52 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
It's a hallmark of Trump. He's says something that's imprecise/sloppy/rambling, then everyone interprets what they want from it.
And this is what we want from the leader of the free world?
Posted on 6/19/26 at 10:04 am to MrLSU
BS. They be trying to account for their high prices. 6 decades ago the world was running out of oil!!
Posted on 6/19/26 at 10:07 am to Bunk Moreland
The binding variable according to Claude
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 6/19/26 at 10:11 am to highcotton2
quote:
My local Buc-ee’s today.
You're either incredibly lucky or a time traveler.
I'm paying a dollar more in oil-rich Oklahoma.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 10:18 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
Is he right?
If he is, why announce it to the world? Maybe everyone in the oil producing world knew it, but if not you just handed Iran key information. If they shut the SoH down again for a couple of weeks they can demand different terms for reopening. Or they can close it and cause a global economic crisis.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 10:21 am to Penrod
Didn’t Biden Admin refuse to fill strategic oil reserve when oil prices went negative during Covid? Seem like that would’ve been the ideal time to essentially fill it for next to nothing.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 10:22 am to PJinAtl
quote:
If he is, why announce it to the world? Maybe everyone in the oil producing world knew it, but if not you just handed Iran key information.
Everyone paying attention to this conflict knew it, if you didn't you should reconsider how you get your news.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 12:13 pm to Powerman
I fully agree what you said here. It’s important to have allies. Lately we have been salty to some of these allies. Poor foreign policy in my opinion.
No country can fully rely on itself. Anyone that says different needs to do some research.
No country can fully rely on itself. Anyone that says different needs to do some research.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 2:05 pm to PJinAtl
quote:
If he is, why announce it to the world?
The CEOs of Exxon and Chevron made statements about the situation. Trump didn’t say anything that was a secret.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 2:18 pm to jammajin
quote:
SFP says this means Trump believes Iran is capable of bringing the global economy to its knees
they definitely can if nobody is capable of stopping their drones and missiles reliably. if we dont have the weapons to stop them in that regard then our answer would have to be bombing of cities or nukes, but because of the structure that irans leadership is designed as, that may not even work either.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 2:21 pm to Bunk Moreland
That’s what you’re hoping for. You and the Mullahs.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 2:24 pm to jammajin
The market will adjust to the soh closing it just would take longer than we want before midterms
Posted on 6/19/26 at 3:12 pm to Hobie101
quote:
And this is what we want from the leader of the free world?
The last leader of the free world was an auto pen who got 80 M votes.
We’re OK thanks.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 3:31 pm to STEVED00
quote:
Didn’t Biden Admin refuse to fill strategic oil reserve when oil prices went negative during Covid? Seem like that would’ve been the ideal time to essentially fill it for next to nothing.
Worse than that. It was during the Trump administration. He intelligently jumped on it, but the democrats would not let him fill it for almost free.
Popular
Back to top


0







