Started By
Message

DC federal judge tosses case against FBI officials accused of lying about Hunter Biden

Posted on 11/2/26 at 10:26 am
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
173740 posts
Posted on 11/2/26 at 10:26 am
quote:

WASHINGTON — A federal magistrate judge dismissed charges Monday against two FBI officials accused of lying to Congress about Hunter Biden’s laptop, saying the case “cannot be described as anything other than weaponization” of the Justice Department.

The ruling from US Magistrate Judge Zia Faruqui followed a two-day probable cause hearing in the case of Nikki Floris and Bradley Benavides, formerly of the FBI’s now-defunct Foreign Influence Task Force.
This post was edited on 11/2/26 at 11:08 am
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
487507 posts
Posted on 11/2/26 at 10:28 am to
This will be a fun thread.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
118801 posts
Posted on 11/2/26 at 10:28 am to
Obama packed that court for a reason. He made his minions untouchable.
Posted by Riverside
Member since Jul 2022
11888 posts
Posted on 11/2/26 at 10:29 am to
This will be reversed. Probable cause isn’t a high burden. More judicial activism from a magistrate judge.
Posted by atlgamecockman
Nola
Member since Dec 2012
4784 posts
Posted on 11/2/26 at 10:31 am to
Can’t wait to see all the lawfare definitions
Posted by Decatur
Member since Mar 2007
33402 posts
Posted on 11/2/26 at 10:31 am to
Looks like we got us a Lawfare here.
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
50877 posts
Posted on 11/2/26 at 10:32 am to
But… they literally lied.
Posted by riccoar
Arkansas
Member since Mar 2006
5643 posts
Posted on 11/2/26 at 10:32 am to
quote:

This will be a fun thread.


Only if you go full douche, probability HIGH, and say the judge ruled correctly.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
173740 posts
Posted on 11/2/26 at 10:33 am to
Is weaponization of the Justice Department lawfare?

Is a DC judge calling it weaponization of the Justice Department, lawfare?

Has a DC judge ever accused in an order, Obama or Biden of weaponizing the Justice Department?

Can the DOJ challenge this ruling?
This post was edited on 11/2/26 at 10:34 am
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
487507 posts
Posted on 11/2/26 at 10:33 am to
quote:

Can’t wait to see all the lawfare definitions

Moi aussi.

We just played this game with the Alaska lawsuit and California ruling just this weekend.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
487507 posts
Posted on 11/2/26 at 10:34 am to
quote:

Is weaponization of the Justice Department lawfare?

Is a DC judge calling it weaponization of the Justice Department, lawfare?


Posted by Houag80
Member since Jul 2019
20657 posts
Posted on 11/2/26 at 10:34 am to
Of course. Just another loser frickstick doing loser frickstick things. Protecting the thugs.
Posted by Doctor B
Member since Jul 2024
2183 posts
Posted on 11/2/26 at 10:35 am to
quote:

US Magistrate Judge Zia Faruqui

I bet her Harris/Walz '24 yard sign was top notch.
Posted by LSU Patrick
Member since Jan 2009
79308 posts
Posted on 11/2/26 at 10:35 am to
quote:

This will be a fun thread.


You ruined it the minute you posted in it.
Posted by antibarner
Member since Oct 2009
27167 posts
Posted on 11/2/26 at 10:36 am to
Did they do as they were accused of doing? Thats the bottom line here. You have judges protecting people of similar ideological beliefs and damn the law.

People such as this do not belong on the bench.
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
145196 posts
Posted on 11/2/26 at 10:36 am to
quote:

This will be a fun thread.


why? i'm guessing this will be reversed. what happened to "nobody is above the law"?

Posted by Decatur
Member since Mar 2007
33402 posts
Posted on 11/2/26 at 10:41 am to
quote:

In an emotional, hourlong address from the bench in Federal District Court in Washington, the magistrate judge, Zia M. Faruqui, said that the case against the former officials — Nikki Floris and Bradley Benavides — was a rushed, political prosecution ordered by the White House intended to affect the upcoming midterm elections. Two weeks ago, the administration charged the former officials with falsely minimizing their work on investigations involving Hunter Biden, the son of the former president.

Judge Faruqui excoriated the U.S. attorney’s office in Washington for how it handled the case, admonishing prosecutors for trying to avoid some of the fundamental checks and balances of the criminal justice system. At the same time, he apologized directly to Ms. Floris and Mr. Benavides for having been “dragged through the process” of being charged by the same federal government they had admirably served for decades.

“I am deeply troubled by what happened here in the case,” Judge Faruqui said. “What has transpired here cannot be described as anything other than weaponization.”


quote:

But during his speech, Judge Faruqui dismantled almost every aspect of the government’s case. He pointed out that most of the false statements the two defendants were charged with making were not actually false, that none of the false statements were made knowingly and that none of them had any material effect on the congressional investigation which they were called upon to assist.


LINK
Posted by captainFid
Never apologize to barbarism
Member since Dec 2014
12123 posts
Posted on 11/2/26 at 10:41 am to
quote:

This will be a fun thread.

It's more fun when your 'profession' hasn't made a mockery of; for neutering the Department of Justice, and the current administration.

But you do you Boo.

Me, I just imagining what special award Justice Boasberg will receive when he arrives in Hell.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
173740 posts
Posted on 11/2/26 at 10:43 am to
This is the same judge that coddled a Trump assassin...
quote:

Who is Judge Zia Faruqui? What we know about the federal magistrate who apologized to Cole Allen

The magistrate judge who apologized to suspected would-be Trump assassin Cole Allen for his treatment inside a Washington, D.C., jail during a Monday emergency motion hearing has been criticized for his standoffishness with the Trump administration over the city's crime crackdown, and praised for his career-long commitment to DEI.

"To me, it’s extremely disturbing that he was put in five-point restraints, a person with no criminal history," Magistrate Judge Zia Faruqui, who devoted much of his career to diversity, equity and inclusion efforts, said during the hearing, adding that Allen is presumed innocent.

He then compared Allen, who is accused of trying to kill President Donald Trump, with suspected Capitol rioters from Jan. 6, 2021.

"It’s troubling. I never heard of one Jan. 6 defendant who was put in five-point restraints or in a safe cell," he said. "If the only way to keep him safe is the most punitive thing, that’s a problem."
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
60971 posts
Posted on 11/2/26 at 10:44 am to
quote:

A federal magistrate judge dismissed charges Monday against two FBI officials accused of lying to Congress about Hunter Biden’s laptop, saying the case “cannot be described as anything other than weaponization” of the Justice Department.


So they knew about the laptop and lied under oath about the laptop to the point where one of them claimed to be "running" a "shadow government" about it... but the attempt to prosecute their perjury "cannot be described as anything other than weaponization"?

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram