- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Connecticut Judge Throws Out Election Results, Orders New Primary After Democrat Fraud
Posted on 11/1/23 at 10:24 pm
Posted on 11/1/23 at 10:24 pm
quote:
In Bridgeport, Connecticut, State Judge William Clark has thrown out the results of the September Democrat primary election and ordered a new primary to be scheduled and conducted [Court Order Here]. The issue was ballot harvesting and ballot fraud – both violations of state law.
The Judge reviewed CCTV footage showing Wanda Geter-Pataky, vice chair of the Bridgeport Democratic Town Committee and operations specialist for the city, and Eneida Martinez, a former City Council member, working to support the party approved candidate. Both Ms Geter-Pataky and Ms Martinez participated in absentee ballot fraud, ballot harvesting and ballot stuffing at drop boxes. Both women invoked the Fifth Amendment when confronted as witnesses by the judge.
![]()
quote:
BRIDGEPORT – A judge ruled on Wednesday to overturn the city’s Democratic primary election, initially won by incumbent Mayor Joe Ganim, following claims of absentee ballot fraud by his opponent, John Gomes.
After two weeks of evidentiary hearings for Gomes’s absentee ballot fraud lawsuit, Judge William Clark ordered a new Democratic primary based on 180 pieces of evidence presented by Gomes’s legal counsel.
In the 37-page ruling, Clark said the video footage presented by Bill Bloss – Gomes’s attorney – was particularly alarming.
“Mr. Ganim was also correct to be ‘shocked’ at what he saw on the video clips in evidence that were shown to him while he was on the witness stand,” Clark wrote. “The videos are shocking to the court and should be shocking to all the parties.
Ganin was one the many city officials called to the Fairfield Judicial District Superior Courthouse for questioning, along with Wanda Geter-Pataky, vice chair of the Bridgeport Democratic Town Committee and operations specialist for the city, and Eneida Martinez, a former City Council member accused by Gomes of stuffing ballot dropboxes.
At the witness stand, Ganim told the court he was “shocked” by an 18-minute video – subpoenaed by Gomes from Bridgeport police – that appeared to show 12 instances of Geter-Pataky either depositing stacks of ballots herself or handing ballots to others from behind her reception desk, and four instances of Martinez dropping off ballots.
Asked about the footage during the hearings, both Geter-Pataky and Martinez asserted their Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination . Ganim, who appeared to win the primary by 250 votes after a count of absentee ballots, denied any involvement in the alleged fraud. (read more)
You don’t need to guess the races of the participants. You know.
LINK
Posted on 11/1/23 at 10:25 pm to GumboPot
Most secure election system in the world, folks.
Posted on 11/1/23 at 10:29 pm to GumboPot
Dems will even cheat other Dems.
Disgusting people
Disgusting people
Posted on 11/1/23 at 10:31 pm to idlewatcher
Not all Dems cheat but all cheaters are democrats
Posted on 11/1/23 at 10:32 pm to idlewatcher
quote:
Dems will even cheat other Dems.
Eventually the left eats their own.
I’m this case, it takes Dems cheating on Dems for a better chance of getting elections fixed.
Posted on 11/1/23 at 11:11 pm to GumboPot
If the Groomers are committing voter fraud in these lower level elections we can only imagine the fraud they commit in national elections ......see the 2020 GE and 2022 Midterms. 

Posted on 11/2/23 at 12:14 am to Amblin
I'm all for tossing these two in jail. Seems pretty clear they cheated bigly. Just don't understand why a statement like "You don’t need to guess the races of the participants. You know." is necessary. If anything, it detracts from this slam dunk case
Posted on 11/2/23 at 3:27 am to GumboPot
just a damn minute here!!!! - what was the nature of the "evidence" they presented to get a court hearing???
Did they show they had enough to change the results??? - if not, how is this 'proof' of anything?
What is the difference between this case and the Trump case in 2020?
Did they show they had enough to change the results??? - if not, how is this 'proof' of anything?
What is the difference between this case and the Trump case in 2020?
Posted on 11/2/23 at 3:47 am to ChineseBandit58
quote:
Did they show they had enough to change the results??? - if not, how is this 'proof' of anything?
So, you are ok with cheating if it doesn't change the election???
Posted on 11/2/23 at 3:51 am to omegaman66
quote:
So, you are ok with cheating if it doesn't change the election???

methinks you have misjudged my intent -

Posted on 11/2/23 at 3:55 am to GumboPot
And people on this board want more paper ballots in LA..,
Posted on 11/2/23 at 3:57 am to ChineseBandit58
quote:
methinks you have misjudged my intent -
Good to hear.
Posted on 11/2/23 at 7:30 am to GumboPot
So how long was this "got busted to court" turn around?
That's the problem we have. Dems know they just have to stall and wait out the 3 or so months up to inauguration. There needs to be a legit avenue to fight fraud before that or a legit removal law of the seated person if it's proven after the fact.
Good to see a judge that isn't afraid to make a call on election issues instead of punting.
That's the problem we have. Dems know they just have to stall and wait out the 3 or so months up to inauguration. There needs to be a legit avenue to fight fraud before that or a legit removal law of the seated person if it's proven after the fact.
Good to see a judge that isn't afraid to make a call on election issues instead of punting.
Posted on 11/2/23 at 7:38 am to GumboPot
The weird thing is, they are going to hold a new primary election AFTER the general election. What's the point?
Posted on 11/2/23 at 7:44 am to AUstar
Trump was winning by 600K in PA and the rustbelt on election night; and people will still gas light like there was no election fraud.
Posted on 11/2/23 at 7:53 am to idlewatcher
quote:
Dems will even cheat other Dems. Disgusting people
Nothing new. Just ask Bernie
Posted on 11/2/23 at 7:58 am to ChineseBandit58
quote:
What is the difference between this case and the Trump case in 2020?
Nothing. That is what makes it so infuriating Bandit.

Posted on 11/2/23 at 7:59 am to idlewatcher
quote:
Dems will even cheat other Dems.
Bernie Sanders says, "No shite," from his beach house.
Posted on 11/2/23 at 8:58 am to GumboPot
This is why video camera footage has been getting deleted and voting machines have been erased following 2020 and 2022. IN the right jurisdiction, the legal system looks the other way and won't punish people who destroy evidence. If you or me did it, we'd be buried under the jail.
Posted on 11/2/23 at 9:14 am to ChineseBandit58
quote:Connecticut statutory law specifically provides for a new election in specific cases of election fraud. Connecticut General Statutes 9-329a.
What is the difference between this case and the Trump case in 2020?
THAT is why they can hold a new election. No similar statute allowed for new federal elections in 2020.
Popular
Back to top
