- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: “Climate Change”
Posted on 4/4/22 at 6:34 pm to Boodis Man
Posted on 4/4/22 at 6:34 pm to Boodis Man
quote:
Can anyone recommend/provide some links for why this is all likely horseshite?
All you need to know is the Libtard’s are pushing it so it absolutely has to be bullshite
Posted on 4/4/22 at 6:45 pm to Boodis Man
1. 3 major powers and over 66% of the earths population don't acknowledge it.. it there were sound proof it existed as a concern they would at least acknowledge it.
2. CNN, Democrat politicians, Globalists and liberal nut jobs embrace it.. which means it's a joke by default.
3. Why are you still asking?
2. CNN, Democrat politicians, Globalists and liberal nut jobs embrace it.. which means it's a joke by default.
3. Why are you still asking?
Posted on 4/4/22 at 6:54 pm to Boodis Man
Climate change, war, and pandemics are the biggest money printing machines on the planet
Zero, and I’ll say it again, ZERO countries on the planet have implemented green energy measures as a result of market forces. If climate change was such a threat and green energy was so great, then surely world governments would be pushing to integrate it based on effectiveness, efficiency, reliability, resource availability, etc. Since wind and solar possess none of those attributes, the only reason people actually use it is because of subsidies. That’s all the proof you need.
We spend 100s of billions on green measures, all for nothing. It’s literally the worst ROI on any investment in history. Germany went to wind energy (20% of their grid) around the same time that France made a push for nuclear. Germany’s electricity costs are 6x higher than France’s lol.
Wind and solar will never be major energy players - you run into the physics problem and the sources of the generation are too diffuse. Nuclear is the future and we’ll be better off as soon as we embrace it. The problem is that it’s very expensive to start up a nuclear plant, and you have both fossil fuel and greentard lobbyists working against it. Diablo Canyon (nuclear) generated 18.3 TWh of electricity on a .742 acre land area in 2018. Topaz (solar facility) generated 1.3 TWh on 8 square miles over the same time period. They needed 8000x the land to produce 1/14th the power. It’s just ridiculous. If someone cries about nuclear waste, tell them that you can fit all the nuclear waste ever generated on a football field
Zero, and I’ll say it again, ZERO countries on the planet have implemented green energy measures as a result of market forces. If climate change was such a threat and green energy was so great, then surely world governments would be pushing to integrate it based on effectiveness, efficiency, reliability, resource availability, etc. Since wind and solar possess none of those attributes, the only reason people actually use it is because of subsidies. That’s all the proof you need.
We spend 100s of billions on green measures, all for nothing. It’s literally the worst ROI on any investment in history. Germany went to wind energy (20% of their grid) around the same time that France made a push for nuclear. Germany’s electricity costs are 6x higher than France’s lol.
Wind and solar will never be major energy players - you run into the physics problem and the sources of the generation are too diffuse. Nuclear is the future and we’ll be better off as soon as we embrace it. The problem is that it’s very expensive to start up a nuclear plant, and you have both fossil fuel and greentard lobbyists working against it. Diablo Canyon (nuclear) generated 18.3 TWh of electricity on a .742 acre land area in 2018. Topaz (solar facility) generated 1.3 TWh on 8 square miles over the same time period. They needed 8000x the land to produce 1/14th the power. It’s just ridiculous. If someone cries about nuclear waste, tell them that you can fit all the nuclear waste ever generated on a football field
Posted on 4/4/22 at 6:58 pm to Miketheseventh
Wrong Again
Great read. Articles and headlines from the last 50 years that are just hilariously wrong
Great read. Articles and headlines from the last 50 years that are just hilariously wrong
This post was edited on 4/4/22 at 6:59 pm
Posted on 4/4/22 at 7:00 pm to Boodis Man
This will get you started
6 hours of combined documentary points. You will see how bad the fraud is after watching just the first hour
6 hours of combined documentary points. You will see how bad the fraud is after watching just the first hour
This post was edited on 4/5/22 at 6:41 am
Posted on 4/4/22 at 8:06 pm to Boodis Man
Of course its real and has affected human populations for thousands of years. In the series the Fall of Civilations it notes several civilizations that were affected. Of course none of this has to do with the fraud in our government created by opportunists who look to steal taxes. But hey there are idiots who need this so the democrat party has a moral platform to compete with the religious right. Neither of which i care about.
FALL OF CIVILATIONS
FALL OF CIVILATIONS
Posted on 4/4/22 at 8:26 pm to Boodis Man
Look up and see how many of the climate change champions have beach front homes
Algore, Obama’s, Pelosi, Leonardo DiCaprio, etc
Algore, Obama’s, Pelosi, Leonardo DiCaprio, etc
Posted on 4/4/22 at 8:53 pm to HonoraryCoonass
quote:
16 years ago, Algore said we had just 10 years to avert a major catastrophe that would send the world into a tail-spin of epic destruction. I don’t know about y’all, but I’m not seeing it.
Well we are already a couple years closer to AOCs doomsday prediction. These fools say this shite knowing folks will forget their predictions and that the media won’t ever call them on it.
This post was edited on 4/4/22 at 8:55 pm
Posted on 4/4/22 at 9:07 pm to BurntOrangeMan
quote:i don’t even wanna ask
3 major powers and over 66% of the earths population don't acknowledge it.. it there were sound proof it existed as a concern they would at least acknowledge it.
Posted on 4/4/22 at 9:11 pm to Boodis Man
high school physics pretty much describes the failure
Posted on 4/4/22 at 9:31 pm to Boodis Man
Look up "Maunder Minimum" and the associated sun spot cycles and their influence on global temperatures - that is what affects our temperature and climate swings, in concert with orbital mechanics between earth and the sun.
Rule number 1 (aka the only rule) - if the lying filth dims support it, you know it's a lie.
Rule number 1 (aka the only rule) - if the lying filth dims support it, you know it's a lie.
Posted on 4/4/22 at 9:38 pm to zeebo
quote:and most importantly the puffing of solar activity - or lack of...
Climate changes depending on where earth is during 12,000 year cycles of elongated orbit around sun. Scammy mcscam scam
Posted on 4/4/22 at 9:38 pm to millerf43
quote:
"Apocalypse Never" -Michael Shellenberger
This is a good one because Shellenberger is an environmentalist who has become a bit of an apostate.
He still sticks with the idea that man is causing some changes but he believes that mankind will adjust and handle it- no apocalypse.
Posted on 4/4/22 at 9:44 pm to Boodis Man
From the memes thread:
Climate change

Climate change

Posted on 4/4/22 at 10:09 pm to HubbaBubba
Maybe the temp rose because the fricking sun came up 
Posted on 4/5/22 at 6:08 am to zeebo
quote:
Co2 makes up Les than half a percent of the atmosphere.
So what? 200 parts per million carbon monoxide will kill you. That is one fifth of 1%.
Posted on 4/5/22 at 6:29 am to Boodis Man
Posted on 4/5/22 at 6:34 am to Penrod
quote:
So what? 200 parts per million carbon monoxide will kill you. That is one fifth of 1%.
It matters because they are saying the rise in co2 is causing climate change and they’re wrong, especially with co2 at such a low percentage. The atmosphere is 95% water vapor and no one ever brings that up. We are in a co2 deficit right now. Optimal plant growth needs 5x what we currently have
Posted on 4/5/22 at 6:38 am to Boodis Man
One hint is in the name 'climate change', which is so vague as to be meaningless, but also allows it to be manipulated into some kind of existential crisis very easily. For virtue signaling dopes that is.
This post was edited on 4/5/22 at 6:45 am
Posted on 4/5/22 at 6:41 am to Boodis Man
LINK A great site with tons of information is wattsupwiththat.com. Created by meteorologist Anthony Watts.
This post was edited on 4/5/22 at 6:43 am
Popular
Back to top


1









