- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: BREAKING: Trump will sign executive order shortly about social media companies
Posted on 5/27/20 at 6:21 pm to Old Hellen Yeller
Posted on 5/27/20 at 6:21 pm to Old Hellen Yeller
quote:
So you have no answer.
So you have no brain?
where the frick have you been dumbass?
obviously not paying attention to what has happened on google, youtube, FB, twatter etc.
0
Posted on 5/27/20 at 6:21 pm to Seldom Seen
quote:
One of the first legal challenges to Section 230 was the 1997 case Zeran v. America Online, Inc., in which a Federal court affirmed that the purpose of Section 230 as passed by Congress was "to remove the disincentives to self-regulation created by the Stratton Oakmont decision". Under that court's holding, computer service providers who regulated the dissemination of offensive material on their services risked subjecting themselves to liability, because such regulation cast the service provider in the role of a publisher. Fearing that the specter of liability would therefore deter service providers from blocking and screening offensive material, Congress enacted § 230's broad immunity "to remove disincentives for the development and utilization of blocking and filtering technologies that empower parents to restrict their children's access to objectionable or inappropriate online material." In addition, Zeran notes "the amount of information communicated via interactive computer services is . . . staggering. The specter of tort liability in an area of such prolific speech would have an obviously chilling effect. It would be impossible for service providers to screen each of their millions of postings for possible problems. Faced with potential liability for each message republished by their services, interactive computer service providers might choose to severely restrict the number and type of messages posted. Congress considered the weight of the speech interests implicated and chose to immunize service providers to avoid any such restrictive effect."
It’s Wiki but it works for background info
Posted on 5/27/20 at 6:22 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:Huh? Are you pretending to be a Trump supporter now that turned because Trump is oh so bad? I ask because what you said above holds 0 merits. If Trump slaps Twitter that's exactly why his supporters voted for him because they all hate Twitter.
Dictator in chief. I’m sorry but this wasn’t why people jumped on the Trump Train. It’s like he wants to lose this election.
Posted on 5/27/20 at 6:22 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
It doesn’t. It’s a bunch of “harmful content” and “community standards” buzzwords that they can define and apply as they see fit
Except for the court rulings that say they can't apply them based on politics. Not if they want to retain their platform protections.
Posted on 5/27/20 at 6:22 pm to texashorn
quote:
The only person being libeled and defamed on Twitter is Joe Scarborough, by the President.
You can't be serious with this shite. Melania is called a whore on twitter, Trump is called a Russian puppet, hell, they were going after the President's son as being autistic for awhile. What the frick do you call that?
Posted on 5/27/20 at 6:22 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:
Dictator in chief. I’m sorry but this wasn’t why people jumped on the Trump Train. It’s like he wants to lose this election.
Well, I won’t speak for everyone like you but for myself, this is exactly why I jumped on the Trump Train.
Posted on 5/27/20 at 6:23 pm to BuckyCheese
quote:
Yet the ban or demonetize people daily for violating their version of leftthink.
This
Twitter killed my account and the only reason I can figure out is I put the Birmingham Mayor on blast about wearing masks.
Posted on 5/27/20 at 6:23 pm to texashorn
quote:
The only person being libeled and defamed on Twitter is Joe Scarborough, by the President.
You mean the guy who spent 3 years of peddling the biggest conspiracy theory in American politics history (Trump/Russia collusion)? That guy?
Posted on 5/27/20 at 6:23 pm to Contra
quote:Good !
BREAKING: Trump will sign executive order shortly about social media companies
Posted on 5/27/20 at 6:24 pm to udtiger
quote:
He and the mods do delete posts and threads and do ban users
Yes
quote:
but they do it based on terms of use agreed to by all of us.
Posted on 5/27/20 at 6:25 pm to Contra
That’s protected political speech, not calling someone a murderer.
Posted on 5/27/20 at 6:27 pm to ninthward
quote:
they all hate Twitter.
It’s a terrible place.
Posted on 5/27/20 at 6:27 pm to texashorn
quote:
That’s protected political speech, not calling someone a murderer.
You and Texrider need hook up for some white wine spritzers
Posted on 5/27/20 at 6:28 pm to Tiguar
quote:
It will overshadow even COVID if it is at all meaningful.
Russ said this week the issues that will decide the election had not happened yet
Posted on 5/27/20 at 6:28 pm to MrLarson
quote:
You and Texrider need hook up for some white wine spritzers
lol
Posted on 5/27/20 at 6:31 pm to texashorn
I can call a public figure murderer all day long and there isn't shite you can do about it.
Posted on 5/27/20 at 6:33 pm to Tiguar
Apparently the freaking news. How about NYT or WaPo?
Posted on 5/27/20 at 6:33 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:
That’s not why I voted for him
No one believes that you actually voted for him
Posted on 5/27/20 at 6:34 pm to tagatose
Actual malice?
Posted on 5/27/20 at 6:34 pm to Contra
Has the executive order been published yet? Is it going to have actionable items or just be a sternly worded letter?
Page 7 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News