- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Breaking: Prosecutors seek to continue Criminal Sentencing of President Trump
Posted on 11/19/24 at 12:44 pm to genuineLSUtiger
Posted on 11/19/24 at 12:44 pm to genuineLSUtiger
Take it a step further. Bragg wants to possibly sentence in 2029.
He's a fricking joke
He's a fricking joke
Posted on 11/19/24 at 12:45 pm to the808bass
quote:
I was assured the left would accept the results of the election.
What does that have to do with litigating legal issues in a state court criminal matter?
Posted on 11/19/24 at 12:45 pm to Strannix
quote:
He was found not guilty by the ultimate jury, The American People
The left truly believes voters are stupid and have no idea what is good for them (us). Even when they win, they think they are far superior.
frick them.
Posted on 11/19/24 at 12:45 pm to John Barron
I'm fully prepared for any fireworks. 
Posted on 11/19/24 at 12:45 pm to John Barron
Merchan adjourned the sentencing hearing until further notice. Of course the prosecution still wants to seek criminal sentencing.
This post was edited on 11/19/24 at 12:47 pm
Posted on 11/19/24 at 12:45 pm to John Barron
Fun fact! Donald J. Trump is not ackshually a "convicted felon" until sentencing and court proceedings have been finalized.
He can legally sue every news entity and talking head that has stood and repeated this false narrative time and time again. Murderin' Joe and Mika, Cooper, Radditz, Maddow, Baier, Wallace, Lemon, Cuomo, Cavuto, Reid, and their employers, among hundreds more.
They know it, and that's why they're REALLY pushing to finalize this thing.
He can legally sue every news entity and talking head that has stood and repeated this false narrative time and time again. Murderin' Joe and Mika, Cooper, Radditz, Maddow, Baier, Wallace, Lemon, Cuomo, Cavuto, Reid, and their employers, among hundreds more.
They know it, and that's why they're REALLY pushing to finalize this thing.
Posted on 11/19/24 at 12:52 pm to John Barron
Democrat leaders are also moving to charge him with battery for what he did to Kamala on election day.
Posted on 11/19/24 at 1:01 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What does that have to do with litigating legal issues in a state court criminal matter?
“Hurr durr. I’m retarded.”
-SFP
Posted on 11/19/24 at 1:09 pm to PaperTiger
quote:
Take it a step further. Bragg wants to possibly sentence in 2029.
Is he dumb enough to not know how Presidential pardon power works?
Last day of office, Trump pardons himself and it’s over.
Posted on 11/19/24 at 1:10 pm to John Barron
This is stupid. Things will change so much in 4 years!
Posted on 11/19/24 at 1:11 pm to the808bass
quote:
“Hurr durr. I’m retarded.”
-SFP
You're certain brand loyal.
You didn't answer the question, though.
This has literally nothing to do with "accepting the results of the election"
There was impact on federal prosecutions due to pre-existing DOJ policy, but this is a state court matter. The constitutional concerns are completely different.
I'm sure you can articulate why, and you won't just rely on base level ad hom attacks to hide yourself from another silly comment. Right? I mean CERTAINLY you're going to cope harder and retreat to "the system is all corrupt" generalities, right?
This post was edited on 11/19/24 at 1:12 pm
Posted on 11/19/24 at 1:14 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What does that have to do with litigating legal issues in a state court criminal matter?

Posted on 11/19/24 at 1:17 pm to MemphisGuy
There is no established (or even alleged, mind you) immunity for a person elected as President for crimes alleged to have occurred outside of their time as President.
Posted on 11/19/24 at 1:18 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Yes they'd have to commit a crime.
There is no established (or even alleged, mind you) immunity for a person elected as President for crimes alleged to have occurred outside of their time as President.
Posted on 11/19/24 at 1:21 pm to John Barron
Why is this surprising? He was found guilty by a jury of his peers. He will be sentenced. He has the right to appeal
That’s how our system works. The election doesn’t change that
That’s how our system works. The election doesn’t change that
Posted on 11/19/24 at 1:32 pm to Homesick Tiger
quote:
That dipshit judge granted the DA permission to bring the charges back up in four years is the way I heard it.
I really hope the USSC does something extreme to these people. I love and cherish the Constitution. But these terrorists have ripped it to shreds, so i'm in by all (nonviolent of course) means necessary mode with the lawfare atrocities.
Popular
Back to top

1










