
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Are we close to going to war with Canada?
Posted on 10/5/26 at 8:35 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 10/5/26 at 8:35 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Not only was it the norm, it was a status quo when Trump himself negotiated the USMCA. Trump had all the opportunity in the world to address these specific issues in 2020 but decided against it.
So you agree they are issues that needed to be addressed.
Good
This post was edited on 10/5/26 at 8:36 am
Posted on 10/5/26 at 8:37 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:They were addressed. Canada was intransigent.
all the opportunity in the world to address these specific issues
Posted on 10/5/26 at 8:41 am to kilo
quote:
So you agree they are issues that needed to be addressed.
Not what I said
Posted on 10/5/26 at 8:45 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:No.
Not what I said
What you said is de facto affirmative action is fine for our trade partners (at our expense)
Posted on 10/5/26 at 8:53 am to Lsujacket66
Canada's military is so small they would have problems against just our Salvation Army.
In all seriousness though, I have to wonder how much more socialism and influx/importation of Indians (dot, not feather) Canadians can take before they go full France on their government.
In all seriousness though, I have to wonder how much more socialism and influx/importation of Indians (dot, not feather) Canadians can take before they go full France on their government.
Posted on 10/5/26 at 8:56 am to TrueTiger
quote:
If Alberta declares independence, we can can recognize them as an independent nation. No need for war.
That doesn’t address OPs problem that Canada will be a cooperating nation with China. Also, almost 50% of Canada is foreign or second gen foreign. They will try to grow to 100 million using immigration.
We have a long border undefended wth them.
Posted on 10/5/26 at 9:01 am to TygerTyger
quote:
A war with Canadia would look like the McNeese game.
Watch Stanford try to play Notre Dame Saturday. It will make McNeese vs. LSU look like high drama.
Posted on 10/5/26 at 9:05 am to SlowFlowPro
Ahhh, slowflomo and powertard sucking each other off in a thread. Who knew? 
Posted on 10/5/26 at 9:06 am to Giantkiller
Hell, we would just take their PM. War over.
Posted on 10/5/26 at 9:11 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I love this line of reasoning
We start an unnecessary trade war with one of our closest allies and largest trading parners
Instead of acquiescing, they look for other options, which is their right (and what they would have never done prior to the US starting an unnecessary trade war with them)
Then we start literally saber-rattling at our bad plan being exposed
It would have been a lot cheaper and +EV to just admit the errors. Could have been solved with a phone call months ago
You're dumb. Not worth the effort to explain the situation. Why would we concede anything to a weaker nation on our border that has been taking advantage of the US for decades?
Rhetorical question....
Posted on 10/5/26 at 9:31 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Not what I said
So you dont think the trade imbalance between the US and Canada is an issue?
This post was edited on 10/5/26 at 9:33 am
Posted on 10/5/26 at 9:40 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I am an American
In a very loose sense yeah
Posted on 10/5/26 at 9:40 am to SlowFlowPro
Why should a smaller dependent nation concerning trade dictate terms favorable to themselves.
Unnecessary is ridiculous term to use.
We asked nicely at first you seem to willingly forget. We had met multiple times with Canada to avoid all this.
Unnecessary is ridiculous term to use.
We asked nicely at first you seem to willingly forget. We had met multiple times with Canada to avoid all this.
Posted on 10/5/26 at 9:45 am to ChatGPT of LA
quote:
give them Minnesota
That might be considered a war crime.
Posted on 10/5/26 at 10:03 am to Lsujacket66
This has happened in a hurry. But if they invite the Chinese in right on our border, they are in trouble. That is a direct provocation. We can play any misdeeds they do against them and the EU. The EU won't function without our partnership. And then there is NATO. We can probably have them kicked out if they are working against our interests.
If they tried to build some defense relationship with China, not good.
They are trying to spite us. It won't come to war unless they persist.
I don't like them. And they don't like us or at least more than half don't like those Pavlovian response dogs.
If they tried to build some defense relationship with China, not good.
They are trying to spite us. It won't come to war unless they persist.
I don't like them. And they don't like us or at least more than half don't like those Pavlovian response dogs.
Posted on 10/5/26 at 10:09 am to TrueTiger
quote:
If Alberta declares independence, we can can recognize them as an independent nation. No need for war.
They wont
Have met several people from there and while they arent as progressive as the rest of canada they still love their socialism.
Posted on 10/5/26 at 10:31 am to lake chuck fan
quote:
Why would we concede anything to a weaker nation on our border that has been taking advantage of the US for decades?
Well you're engaging in framing there. I'll let you figure out which part.
Even given your dishonest framing, are we better off with that scenario OR less efficient and profitable trade with Canada while they both enrich China with this trade AND allow China's influence into our continent?

Popular
Back to top



1














