- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Are there any conservative "influencers" that aren't awful?
Posted on 1/20/24 at 11:26 am to reddy tiger
Posted on 1/20/24 at 11:26 am to reddy tiger
Yeah. There are so many leftist influencers that aren’t awful.
You people are awesome.
You people are awesome.
0
Posted on 1/20/24 at 11:54 am to Thundercles
I don’t pay attention to anybody who uses “influencer” as a job title or personal description.
Posted on 1/20/24 at 12:08 pm to Thundercles
quote:How old are you, if you don’t mind my asking?
Steven Crowder was alright but the bulk of his show is weak and surrounded by dorky lackeys. I think the Hodge Twins have been the most consistent.
Posted on 1/20/24 at 12:18 pm to Y.A. Tittle
VDH is great, but man..is he boring. I seriously listen to him if I want to take a nap
Posted on 1/20/24 at 1:35 pm to Thundercles
Shoe on head is a solid youtuber for critiquing internet culture
whatifalthist is a good history one
whatifalthist is a good history one
Posted on 1/20/24 at 1:37 pm to Thundercles
Catturd
Posted on 1/20/24 at 1:39 pm to Thundercles
No.
There are no “influencers” of any stripe that aren’t awful. They are all inherently awful.
Eta: I’m constantly floored by the amount of seemingly middle-aged and professionally-employed men on the board who follow random losers on the internet.
There are no “influencers” of any stripe that aren’t awful. They are all inherently awful.
Eta: I’m constantly floored by the amount of seemingly middle-aged and professionally-employed men on the board who follow random losers on the internet.
This post was edited on 1/20/24 at 1:43 pm
Posted on 1/20/24 at 1:40 pm to kingbob
quote:
Shoe on head is a solid youtuber for critiquing internet culture
Considers herself a liberal, even if she’s well past that party.
Razorfist
Posted on 1/20/24 at 1:42 pm to philter
quote:
Viva Frei and Robert Barnes.
Barnes is a brilliant guy and really loves talking about the country's historical populist streak.
Patrick Bet-David is a little like Barnes. He's based, but really just respects anyone who fights the establishment. PBD will engage with the left a lot more than Viva and Barnes.
Bongino was incredible during Russiagate, but he's kind of boring on a day to day basis.
Catturd was OK for a while, but has gotten caught up in the aura of being an influencer.
Pedro Gonzalez is a bright guy and does good work from a Ronbot/anti-Trump perspective. But, I think he said some bad things about the chosen people.
Posted on 1/20/24 at 1:43 pm to Thundercles
quote:
Clay Travis - I liked his site sometimes when he was half sports/half centrist politics. He was always kind of a blowhard but was right often. Then sold his site and left hacks to run it and decided to become a (very rich) radio persona and I haven't heard much from him since.
He's also a 2x Obama voter. I don't believe a word that comes out of his mouth.
Jesse Kelly is the answer OP is looking for.
Posted on 1/20/24 at 1:51 pm to Indefatigable
Could you answer the following question?
quote:
If Biden says that militias (aka US citizens that won’t support his stupidity) are terrorists, can he have the military (arbitrarily and without penalty) kill them?
Posted on 1/20/24 at 2:03 pm to Thundercles
We need to go back to the days when Hannity & Colmes gave us the range of allowable political opinion.
Everything was so much less complicated then.
Oh, BTW: Did you know that Sensei once was paid to hammer a nail?
Posted on 1/20/24 at 2:45 pm to Toomer Deplorable
The Lotus Eaters are good but they are British so about half the stuff they talk about is American politics and the other half is British and European politics. Also YouTube hates them and has demonitized them and will not inform you when they post new videos.
This post was edited on 1/20/24 at 2:47 pm
Posted on 1/20/24 at 2:58 pm to Thundercles
James Woods
@RealJamesWoods
@RealJamesWoods
Posted on 1/20/24 at 3:46 pm to Thundercles
quote:
Are there any conservative "influencers" that aren't awful?
Anyone who is a social media "influencer" is generally garbage.
Now, some conservative commentators who have exclusively online content are great, some are not. About what you will find in any other subject.
Posted on 1/20/24 at 4:31 pm to Thundercles
The REAL QUESTION IS: ARE there ANY democrats with a heartbeat that’s a decent human being that loves their country?
Answer is NO
Answer is NO
Posted on 1/20/24 at 4:33 pm to Thundercles
All "inluencers" suck. Both sides.
What kind of loser needs to be influenced?
What kind of loser needs to be influenced?
Posted on 1/20/24 at 4:40 pm to Thundercles
quote:
Are there any conservative "influencers" that aren't awful?
What are you wanting from these people?
Posted on 1/20/24 at 4:41 pm to mauser
quote:
Dinesh D'Souza isn't smug nor histrionic.
He's just a con-man.
Posted on 1/20/24 at 4:45 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
Victor Davis Hanson is pretty great, though.
A nice man. Good guy. I've read his columns, listened to him on and off for years.
His cautiousness and tardiness to issues has disappointed me.
Scouting Report: Stays in his lane. Plays it too safe, afraid to take chances.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News