- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 2/5/26 at 12:13 pm to ChewyDante
quote:
If the goal is dating with the intention of finding a potential person to start a family with, I would consider leftist women to be undateable
Nah, date her. When she starts getting it steadily, from a man with a way with women, she’ll slide rightward.
Posted on 2/5/26 at 12:15 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
A simple solution seems to be to push people away from the poles and silly rules about dating people in a perceived out group just for political beliefs.
I know these aren't "young" people but my best friend is in her late 30s and is pretty liberal and is dating a late 30s guy who I suspect is MAGA. I mean... he wears American flag clothes. They're exclusive and have been dating for several months.
They both have kids from previously relationships so they aren't looking to start a family. I just don't think regular people obsess over politics to the extent politards think they do. I could be wrong, though.
Posted on 2/5/26 at 12:16 pm to Ebridg3
Posted on 2/5/26 at 12:19 pm to Ebridg3
Honestly, many of the progressive females I know who go around throwing in people's faces are toxic individuals in general. They often have some genuine mental health problems.
Posted on 2/5/26 at 12:20 pm to HouseMom
quote:
People just aren't that black and white in terms of their beliefs.
As i see it at the highest level it’s globalists/collectivists/post Christian morality/socialists vs nationalists/individual rights advocates/christian based morality/capitalists.
Within those camps discourse can occur to determine policy because the guidelines and foundational morality are established and the divides are within a range that is consistent with compromise.
How does a person who advocates for globalism and 15 minute cities due to climate change because they think the world is going to end if they don’t immediate changes make sustainable compromises with people who are entirely happy with the status quo circa 2005 or so and aren’t willing to give up their constitutional freedoms and wealth to accommodate any of those things?
The political structures aren’t built to accommodate both so one has to win, one has to lose or the structure has to give way.
At the current level of divide it’s a zero sum game and that always devolves into horrible outcomes for someone unless the rules or game itself is changed.
Posted on 2/5/26 at 12:32 pm to tide06
quote:
How does a person who advocates for globalism and 15 minute cities due to climate change because they think the world is going to end if they don’t immediate changes make sustainable compromises with people who are entirely happy with the status quo circa 2005 or so and aren’t willing to give up their constitutional freedoms and wealth to accommodate any of those things?
These are relatively extreme examples, and these people will likely never agree fully, but I do think they can still find common ground. My earlier point is that people need to be encouraged to move away from these polar opposites and think their way to alternate options.
quote:
The political structures aren’t built to accommodate both so one has to win, one has to lose or the structure has to give way.
Honestly, our political structure is nearly perfect and why our country is so successful, but as a people, we've lost the plot. I do have faith in humanity, and I pray we can find mostly common ground again. The USA is a big family though, so we're always going to squabble a little amongst ourselves.
Posted on 2/5/26 at 1:01 pm to Ebridg3
Do yourself a favor and move away from the big city blue politics ….to a small town. Meet a conservative, beautiful southern girl ….and live a happy life.
Posted on 2/5/26 at 1:03 pm to Lsupimp
Liberal women are only good for one thing. Wild unhinged sex.
You don't have to worry about her coming after you for child support because she will abort the baby without you even knowing.
You don't have to worry about her coming after you for child support because she will abort the baby without you even knowing.
Posted on 2/5/26 at 1:24 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Seems like a major demographic issue for non-Leftist men who are young Millennials, Gen Z, and Gen Alpha.
Not even close. The conservatives are reproducing at replacement level while democrats ie Marxists are not even close. It’s why they have to import millions of 3rd world socialist leeches
This post was edited on 2/5/26 at 1:25 pm
Posted on 2/5/26 at 2:18 pm to aubiecat
quote:
Liberal women are only good for one thing. Wild unhinged sex.
You don't have to worry about her coming after you for child support because she will abort the baby without you even knowing.
LOL.
I love art, music and literature. Liberal women, in my experience, tend to value those things more highly-on the whole-than conservative women. That's my silver lining.
Posted on 2/5/26 at 2:53 pm to Ebridg3
quote:
is it possible to actually have a healthy, mutually respectful relationship?
Forget about trying to change their political beliefs.
You either have to accept them as they are or hit the road.
And if you stay, expect them act like they are having their period 80% of the time.
And when you are around their liberal friends, if you say something that is rational or makes sense, they will not support you. They will side with their friend and ask why you are being insensitive.
Liberal women usually follow the trends of the Left. So as the Left gets even more unhinged, you can expect the woman to follow along and be miserable as most Leftist women are already.
Posted on 2/5/26 at 3:05 pm to Penrod
quote:
Each consensus is general. It’s what the word means.
Equivocation.
Consensus: "A general agreement, collective opinion, or harmony of sentiment among a group, signifying that everyone (or a vast majority) agrees on a decision, belief, or course of action."
When he says "general," he's specifying the group, in this case, all conservative men in America. He's not using it in the same sense as it is used in the definition.
Because you could have a minority consensus as well. Nothing about the word prohibits that.
Posted on 2/5/26 at 3:06 pm to Ebridg3
quote:
Are liberal women even dateable in 2026 for conservative men?
Who would want one? She would ruin your life.
Posted on 2/5/26 at 3:31 pm to UtahCajun
quote:
Seriously. It is a thing. Apparently, from recent data shown to me,
This is a really good move, far better than settling for a lib with a mood disorder.
Posted on 2/5/26 at 3:48 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
Because you could have a minority consensus as well.
You could have a consensus among a minority. If you do, you’d have to specify that, e.g. “The consensus among Native Americans is…” A lack of specification of an object group implies that the consensus is among the wider group. To then add “general” is redundant. It’s one of those stubborn redundancies like “hot water heater”. Let’s look at an example:
About 80% of Americans think illegal aliens with criminal records should be deported. So we might say, “The consensus is that illegals with criminal records should be deported.” There now, that’s plain isn’t it? Because I didn’t specify a group it’s perfectly clear that I’m talking about a consensus among all Americans.
Posted on 2/5/26 at 4:10 pm to Ebridg3
quote:
Whats the general consensus on this?
Hell no.
Posted on 2/5/26 at 4:12 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
is dating a late 30s guy who I suspect is MAGA
Should he be stoned or flogged, in your opinion?
Popular
Back to top


1









