- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 4/9/26 at 2:26 am to Chuck Barris
quote:
We have achieved military victory without a doubt.
Whether we win politically or economically remains to be seen, imo.
Well, the definition of victory depends on what your goals were to begin with.
My definition of victory is very simple.
Did the other side surrender?
If there is debate over whether or not you won a war...you didn't.
I'm not interested in a cease fire. I want to see some Iranian's signature on an unconditional surrender.
Posted on 4/9/26 at 6:40 am to Tridentds
The transition to writing in Farsi is going to be a bitch. Right to left.
Posted on 4/9/26 at 7:08 am to BamaGradinTn
quote:The vast majority of wars don't end in "unconditional surrender," even when it is very clear who won.
I'm not interested in a cease fire. I want to see some Iranian's signature on an unconditional surrender.
If you want this to end with American troops holding a parade in Tehran and American companies rebuilding the bridges, then I think you want to achieve something that would be not only extremely difficult and costly, but also beyond what even our own government hopes to achieve.
Posted on 4/9/26 at 7:33 am to Chuck Barris
Some people are so stupid! It's really about what didn't happen. I guarantee Iran was up to no good and if we continued to ignore it, it would be way worse than anything you're going through now! 
Posted on 4/9/26 at 7:56 am to Chuck Barris
quote:
He specifically warned that a major campaign would drastically deplete American munitions stockpiles, such as missile interceptors, which were already strained due to ongoing support for other regional allies.
This whole operation was and remains a terrible idea, BUT if we can’t bomb Iran for a month without depleting stockpiles—then our military isn’t ready for shite.
Posted on 4/9/26 at 7:58 am to Indefatigable
quote:
This whole operation was and remains a terrible idea, BUT if we can’t bomb Iran for a month without depleting stockpiles—then our military isn’t ready for shite.
I bet they're ready to write a big fat check to Raytheon.
Posted on 4/9/26 at 8:05 am to Tigerdad2001
quote:
Some people are so stupid! It's really about what didn't happen. I guarantee Iran was up to no good and if we continued to ignore it, it would be way worse than anything you're going through now!
1. I heard this exact same rhetoric about Iraq in 2003, back when I was naive enough to believe it. I learned my lesson about taking "We have to act now to stop their nefarious plots!" propaganda at face value, but I suppose not everyone did.
2. Iran was absolutely a threat... to Israel. This war is about the security of Israel, not the United States. Of course the Israelis want the Iranian government neutralized or overthrown because Iran is the main supporter of Hezbollah.
Vance, Caine, and Ratcliffe all realized that this conflict was a bad idea to begin with, but Trump bought Netanyahu’s sales pitch of a quick, easy, dominant victory for some reason.
This post was edited on 4/9/26 at 8:07 am
Posted on 4/9/26 at 8:06 am to Tridentds
No one gives anything any time to work. It is such a pussy society we live in today.
Kinks happen at work when you make plans. Things happen in sports (you make adjustments), etc.
People are just so eager to make the first thread, the first post, the first headline . . .
Insanity reigns in the world of social media and right-now news.
And of course the kooks on social media, as well as this site (that I’m about to give up on) lets them in.
Kinks happen at work when you make plans. Things happen in sports (you make adjustments), etc.
People are just so eager to make the first thread, the first post, the first headline . . .
Insanity reigns in the world of social media and right-now news.
And of course the kooks on social media, as well as this site (that I’m about to give up on) lets them in.
This post was edited on 4/9/26 at 8:08 am
Posted on 4/9/26 at 8:10 am to Chuck Barris
quote:
Vance, Caine, and Ratcliffe all realized that this conflict was a bad idea to begin with, but Trump bought Netanyahu’s sales pitch of a quick, easy, dominant victory for some reason
What's disturbing is Lindsey said he "coached" Netanyahu on how to persuade Trump.
Absolutely shameful
Posted on 4/9/26 at 8:15 am to Chuck Barris
quote:
The New York Times report
(sigh)
Posted on 4/9/26 at 8:16 am to Bham4Tide
quote:
No one gives anything any time to work. It is such a pussy society we live in today.
Netanyahu baited Trump into this by claiming victory would be swift
If we want to walk away from this with a win it has to be done quickly
We don't have the luxury of this being a prolonged conflict if the Iranians can continue to keep the strait closed and continue attacks on the gulf state infrastructure.
Posted on 4/9/26 at 8:21 am to Powerman
Can you stop acting like you anything
All your links are according to sources. You dont know shite
Stop being a hamas bro as well
All your links are according to sources. You dont know shite
Stop being a hamas bro as well
Posted on 4/9/26 at 8:25 am to SDVTiger
You think we can have a prolonged shut down of the strait without consequences?
We're already reaching about the limit of what we're willing to tolerate, hence Trump making threats if they don't reopen it.
We're already reaching about the limit of what we're willing to tolerate, hence Trump making threats if they don't reopen it.
Posted on 4/9/26 at 9:15 am to Powerman
quote:
You think we can have a prolonged shut down of the strait without consequences?
Nothing is shut down
Like i said stop acting like you are privy to anything
Posted on 4/9/26 at 9:18 am to SDVTiger
quote:
Like i said stop acting like you are privy to anything
He's privy to them.
Posted on 4/9/26 at 9:19 am to Centinel
quote:
He's privy to them
Yeah left wing articles
Posted on 4/9/26 at 9:24 am to Chuck Barris
quote:
Either that, or there are people high up in the military, diplomatic, and and intelligence circles who are really ticked off about their advice being ignored and willing to air dirty laundry to the press as a form of pushback.
I'll let you decide which of the two you think is more likely.
Or in the alternative, misinformation.
The Times didn’t name a source, anonymous or otherwise and actually presented it as if they witnessed firsthand.
Considering this has not been corroborated and how the Times has pushed narratives that were unfounded and later disproven, which is more likely to be true?
Posted on 4/9/26 at 10:28 am to SDVTiger
quote:You don't need inside information to know that there isn't unrestricted travel through the strait.
Nothing is shut down
Like i said stop acting like you are privy to anything
Edit
Iran tightens its grip on Hormuz despite cease fire - WSJ
Yup, it's shut due to Israeli / Hezbollah conflict in Lebanon.
This post was edited on 4/9/26 at 11:57 am
Posted on 4/9/26 at 10:50 am to cyarrr
quote:It's fairly clear that this is presented as being leaked by those who were present at the meeting or by those who had conversations with people who were present. No one is claiming that a reporter was cleverly hidden behind a curtain.
The Times didn’t name a source, anonymous or otherwise and actually presented it as if they witnessed firsthand.
The accounts are in line with what we know about the views of the people mentioned, particularly J.D. Vance pushing back against a war in the Middle East without clear objectives.
It's worth noting that the administration is on a warpath this morning trying to find the people who leaked these supposedly fictional conversations.
Genuine question: Has the White House directly stated "None of those conversations ever happened" or not?
Popular
Back to top


0







