Started By
Message

re: Apparently CNN is calling it for Iran.

Posted on 4/9/26 at 12:04 am to
Posted by windmill
Prairieville, La
Member since Dec 2005
7835 posts
Posted on 4/9/26 at 12:04 am to
Don’t minimize the damage done to/ in Iran from the bombings by the US military. The damage is widespread and severe.
Posted by BamaGradinTn
Murfreesboro
Member since Dec 2008
29332 posts
Posted on 4/9/26 at 2:26 am to
quote:

We have achieved military victory without a doubt.

Whether we win politically or economically remains to be seen, imo.
Well, the definition of victory depends on what your goals were to begin with.


My definition of victory is very simple.

Did the other side surrender?

If there is debate over whether or not you won a war...you didn't.

I'm not interested in a cease fire. I want to see some Iranian's signature on an unconditional surrender.
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
38232 posts
Posted on 4/9/26 at 6:40 am to
The transition to writing in Farsi is going to be a bitch. Right to left.
Posted by Chuck Barris
Member since Apr 2013
3378 posts
Posted on 4/9/26 at 7:08 am to
quote:

I'm not interested in a cease fire. I want to see some Iranian's signature on an unconditional surrender.
The vast majority of wars don't end in "unconditional surrender," even when it is very clear who won.

If you want this to end with American troops holding a parade in Tehran and American companies rebuilding the bridges, then I think you want to achieve something that would be not only extremely difficult and costly, but also beyond what even our own government hopes to achieve.
Posted by Tigerdad2001
Watson
Member since Sep 2013
1007 posts
Posted on 4/9/26 at 7:33 am to
Some people are so stupid! It's really about what didn't happen. I guarantee Iran was up to no good and if we continued to ignore it, it would be way worse than anything you're going through now!
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
38249 posts
Posted on 4/9/26 at 7:56 am to
quote:

He specifically warned that a major campaign would drastically deplete American munitions stockpiles, such as missile interceptors, which were already strained due to ongoing support for other regional allies.

This whole operation was and remains a terrible idea, BUT if we can’t bomb Iran for a month without depleting stockpiles—then our military isn’t ready for shite.
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
28691 posts
Posted on 4/9/26 at 7:58 am to
quote:

This whole operation was and remains a terrible idea, BUT if we can’t bomb Iran for a month without depleting stockpiles—then our military isn’t ready for shite.


I bet they're ready to write a big fat check to Raytheon.
Posted by Chuck Barris
Member since Apr 2013
3378 posts
Posted on 4/9/26 at 8:05 am to
quote:

Some people are so stupid! It's really about what didn't happen. I guarantee Iran was up to no good and if we continued to ignore it, it would be way worse than anything you're going through now!


1. I heard this exact same rhetoric about Iraq in 2003, back when I was naive enough to believe it. I learned my lesson about taking "We have to act now to stop their nefarious plots!" propaganda at face value, but I suppose not everyone did.

2. Iran was absolutely a threat... to Israel. This war is about the security of Israel, not the United States. Of course the Israelis want the Iranian government neutralized or overthrown because Iran is the main supporter of Hezbollah.

Vance, Caine, and Ratcliffe all realized that this conflict was a bad idea to begin with, but Trump bought Netanyahu’s sales pitch of a quick, easy, dominant victory for some reason.
This post was edited on 4/9/26 at 8:07 am
Posted by Bham4Tide
In a Van down by the River
Member since Feb 2011
24684 posts
Posted on 4/9/26 at 8:06 am to
No one gives anything any time to work. It is such a pussy society we live in today.

Kinks happen at work when you make plans. Things happen in sports (you make adjustments), etc.

People are just so eager to make the first thread, the first post, the first headline . . .

Insanity reigns in the world of social media and right-now news.

And of course the kooks on social media, as well as this site (that I’m about to give up on) lets them in.



This post was edited on 4/9/26 at 8:08 am
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
175513 posts
Posted on 4/9/26 at 8:10 am to
quote:


Vance, Caine, and Ratcliffe all realized that this conflict was a bad idea to begin with, but Trump bought Netanyahu’s sales pitch of a quick, easy, dominant victory for some reason

What's disturbing is Lindsey said he "coached" Netanyahu on how to persuade Trump.

Absolutely shameful
Posted by soonerinlOUisiana
South of I-10
Member since Aug 2012
2645 posts
Posted on 4/9/26 at 8:15 am to
quote:

The New York Times report


(sigh)
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
175513 posts
Posted on 4/9/26 at 8:16 am to
quote:


No one gives anything any time to work. It is such a pussy society we live in today.

Netanyahu baited Trump into this by claiming victory would be swift

If we want to walk away from this with a win it has to be done quickly

We don't have the luxury of this being a prolonged conflict if the Iranians can continue to keep the strait closed and continue attacks on the gulf state infrastructure.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
99371 posts
Posted on 4/9/26 at 8:21 am to
Can you stop acting like you anything

All your links are according to sources. You dont know shite

Stop being a hamas bro as well
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
175513 posts
Posted on 4/9/26 at 8:25 am to
You think we can have a prolonged shut down of the strait without consequences?

We're already reaching about the limit of what we're willing to tolerate, hence Trump making threats if they don't reopen it.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
99371 posts
Posted on 4/9/26 at 9:15 am to
quote:

You think we can have a prolonged shut down of the strait without consequences?



Nothing is shut down

Like i said stop acting like you are privy to anything
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
46635 posts
Posted on 4/9/26 at 9:18 am to
quote:

Like i said stop acting like you are privy to anything


He's privy to them.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
99371 posts
Posted on 4/9/26 at 9:19 am to
quote:

He's privy to them


Yeah left wing articles
Posted by cyarrr
Prairieville
Member since Jun 2017
4323 posts
Posted on 4/9/26 at 9:24 am to
quote:

Either that, or there are people high up in the military, diplomatic, and and intelligence circles who are really ticked off about their advice being ignored and willing to air dirty laundry to the press as a form of pushback.

I'll let you decide which of the two you think is more likely.


Or in the alternative, misinformation.

The Times didn’t name a source, anonymous or otherwise and actually presented it as if they witnessed firsthand.

Considering this has not been corroborated and how the Times has pushed narratives that were unfounded and later disproven, which is more likely to be true?

Posted by Chuck Barris
Member since Apr 2013
3378 posts
Posted on 4/9/26 at 10:28 am to
quote:

Nothing is shut down

Like i said stop acting like you are privy to anything
You don't need inside information to know that there isn't unrestricted travel through the strait.

Edit

Iran tightens its grip on Hormuz despite cease fire - WSJ
Yup, it's shut due to Israeli / Hezbollah conflict in Lebanon.
This post was edited on 4/9/26 at 11:57 am
Posted by Chuck Barris
Member since Apr 2013
3378 posts
Posted on 4/9/26 at 10:50 am to
quote:

The Times didn’t name a source, anonymous or otherwise and actually presented it as if they witnessed firsthand.
It's fairly clear that this is presented as being leaked by those who were present at the meeting or by those who had conversations with people who were present. No one is claiming that a reporter was cleverly hidden behind a curtain.

The accounts are in line with what we know about the views of the people mentioned, particularly J.D. Vance pushing back against a war in the Middle East without clear objectives.

It's worth noting that the administration is on a warpath this morning trying to find the people who leaked these supposedly fictional conversations.

Genuine question: Has the White House directly stated "None of those conversations ever happened" or not?
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram