re: Any takers for a discussion about “Marxian economics”?

quote:

---

This boomer did none of that

---

Sorry you missed out on the opportunity to enrich yourself at the expense of your fellow Americans while lining the pockets of Communist China.

quote:

---

but I do hope the likes of you and other whiners rots.

---

Pointing out reality is not whining.

quote:

---

Did the central planning align with the decline of real wages and de industrialization though? That started in the 50s or 60s.

---

Central Planning was introduced in 1928 by Joseph Stalin through a series of centralized Five-Year Plans. Long story short, estimated 10 million people starved to death, the economy and the plan was a disaster. The Soviet Union was a failure. China is still a third world country with limited freedom unless you are a party official, oh and don't forget the purge, The Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution. How many people died?

You want to talk about North Korea?

Hey there is Cuba? Can't keep the lights on and the people suffer but hey, according to Bernie and you they have free health care.

You are not smart and not nearly as smart as you think you are, actually you are a moron. I suggest you stop and reevaluate your education and start over from scratch.

Karl Marx argues that capitalism generates wealth by exploiting workers' labor, concentrating profits among capital owners, and creating economic inequality and recurring crises.

Which isn't untrue. But If labor is fairly paid is it exploited? Like others pointed out. Our poor are rich in the world stage. Our system has flaws but I can't realtor name a better one. More countries want to adopt our system or adapt parts of it.

quote:

---

Are Marxists ready to have the conversation about pushing women into the labor market was quite literally an op to stagnate wages?

---

Not only stagnate wages but also kill off the nuclear family. Feminism is one of the most damaging movements in history

Well in a free market those workers choose to work for those wages.

One would think the producer would produce a much as they could that could be distributed without lowering demand or profits. But that is more economics.
If a car company made 3x the amount of cars demand calls for they would have to cut prices and lose profits. So there is a cap to producing.

quote:

---

Are Marxists ready to have the conversation about pushing women into the labor market was quite literally an op to stagnate wages?

---

You’re going to upset the boss bitch OP.

(She’s unemployed with delinquent children)

quote:

---

Our system has flaws but I can't realtor name a better one. More countries want to adopt our system or adapt parts of it.

---

IMO, everyone legally in this country has an opportunity to better themselves if they simply apply themselves, show some strong work ethic, and sacrifice a little. The problem we have now is that the younger generations don't want to work hard, in general, and definitely aren't willing to sacrifice....they want what they want, and they want it now, and still, they aren't willing to work hard. They don't want to live within their means, or build wealth. They want get rich quick. The American Dream is still alive and well, for those that are actually willing to commit and sacrifice.

That is true and more successful companies can pay more and have greater benefits as a result of their success. In Marxism. Every one makes the same regardless of job (on paper not practice)
Our system you want to advance to get a raise or increase productivity for bonuses.

Yeah when I was a kid everyone wanted to be an astronaut or a doctor. Now every kid wants to be an influencer or a streamer.