Started By
Message

re: Alan Dershowitz Says Jack Smith May Be Indicted If Trump Wins Case

Posted on 8/3/23 at 3:39 pm to
Posted by SOSFAN
Blythewood
Member since Jun 2018
12248 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 3:39 pm to
Dershowitz has lost more knowledge on constitutional law than you and I together will ever have.
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
46245 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 3:39 pm to
quote:

That’s Q level wishcasting



So you have faith in the corrupt two tier justice system or you're speaking as a never Trumper?
Posted by POTUS2024
Member since Nov 2022
11363 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 3:42 pm to
quote:

Dershowitz keeps claiming this is a First Amendment case. It is not. The indictment specifically states Trump has a right to voice his opinion about the election, and even lie about the election if he wants to. Trump is not being indicted for statements made in his Jan. 6 speech.

The First Amendment does not protect your right to commit a crime. If your speech is part of a fraudulent conspiracy, you aren't protected.

I think the indictment might be a stretch on fraud against the US, but you can expect to hear more evidence as co conspirators get charged in superceding indictments.


If you were correct about this, Smith would not have manipulated Trump's comments when he quoted him in the indictment.
Posted by ManBearSharkReb
Member since Dec 2018
3785 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 4:26 pm to
quote:

The First Amendment does not protect your right to commit a crime. If your speech is part of a fraudulent conspiracy, you aren't protected.


Good to know. With that logic every person who spread Russian collusion lies will now be charged for trying to overthrow a democratically elected president.
Posted by AndyJ
Member since Jul 2008
2761 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 4:30 pm to
They are not going to prosecute him over things he did in his government capacity. And I know that’s rich considering what they are doing to Trump
Posted by Dday63
Member since Sep 2014
2299 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 5:56 pm to
quote:

If you were correct about this, Smith would not have manipulated Trump's comments when he quoted him in the indictment.


Please. It's an indictment. It isn't evidence. There is plenty of time for the DOJ to present evidence and the Defense to rebut.

But also, Trump is not being indicted for inciting the Capitol Building demonstration. The groups and individuals who participated in the demonstration are not part of the alleged conspiracy.
Posted by Category5
Member since Mar 2019
292 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 6:27 pm to
quote:

If your speech is part of a fraudulent conspiracy


Wouldn't the DOJ's jock strap lawyer have to prove Trump didn't believe he lost the election in order to prove a crime?
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
42727 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 7:14 pm to
INVALID PREMISE!!

Because AggieHank has not appeared to set the subject straight - that's how I know
Posted by gobnugget
If you
Member since Dec 2020
842 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 7:28 pm to
Patriots are in control. Trust Dershowitz.
Posted by Dday63
Member since Sep 2014
2299 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 7:31 pm to
quote:

Wouldn't the DOJ's jock strap lawyer have to prove Trump didn't believe he lost the election in order to prove a crime?


That's a little unclear, because the law is so vague.

For something like his phone call to the Georgia SOS, it probably wasn't fraudulent if Trump truly believed his facts were correct (even though he had already been told they were not correct). If he honestly thought there was a legal way to reverse the GA results, then that phone call may not have been fraud.

But the scheme to submit votes from fake electors and have Pence throw out the legit votes is fraudulent even if Trump believed he won. You can't accomplish something illegally just because you believe you were cheated.

Say you thought you had $10,000 in the bank, but the bank says you only have $2,000. You're mortgage is due and you are about to be in serious trouble. You can't just go rob the bank and try to justify it due to the bank's error. You need to recover your money (plus any damages) through legal means.
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
19637 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 7:39 pm to
quote:

Please. It's an indictment. It isn't evidence.


It's just another "get Trump" fabrication by another TDS demprog who is undermining the shreds of credibility the judicial system has left.

Meanwhile, Biden and son have been caught extorting a 10 million dollar bribe from Burisma among other things.
Posted by ItNeverRains
37069
Member since Oct 2007
25548 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 7:49 pm to
We just need smaller nation states. This experiment has failed. Humans like smaller homogenous like minded territories.
Posted by AUbused
Member since Dec 2013
7771 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 7:51 pm to
Next you guys are going to SWEAR the fricking kraken is gonna be released any day now!!!!!
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
68129 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 7:53 pm to

If Trump wins Jack better gather his family and get the frick out of the U.S.A.
Posted by Category5
Member since Mar 2019
292 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 10:34 pm to
quote:

the scheme to submit votes from fake electors and have Pence throw out the legit votes is fraudulent


I don't think Trump asked or ordered Pence to throw out elector votes. Trump and many others asked Pence to pause and have an audit, which he could have done.
Posted by LSUvet72
Member since Sep 2013
12091 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 10:38 pm to
Any Judge true to the Constition and right to free speech would sanction Jack and suggest he lose his law license.
Posted by Tigahs24Seven
Communist USA
Member since Nov 2007
12157 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 10:52 pm to
quote:

Next you guys are going to SWEAR the fricking kraken is gonna be released any day now!!!!!


Maybe it will be.
You nervous? Ha! This is gonna be fun.
Posted by cmayes56
Alabama
Member since Oct 2015
2844 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 10:53 pm to
Not according to Pence
Posted by B2BWWchamps
Jasper, FL
Member since Aug 2023
649 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 10:56 pm to


They opened the Trump Can of wormsss
Posted by 3nOut
Central Texas, TX
Member since Jan 2013
28985 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 11:00 pm to
quote:

. If your speech is part of a fraudulent conspiracy, you aren't protected.


I’d like to air some legal grievances against some government officials then.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram