- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Alan Dershowitz Says Jack Smith May Be Indicted If Trump Wins Case
Posted on 8/3/23 at 1:52 pm
Posted on 8/3/23 at 1:52 pm
Good discussion of the law, the absurdity and why the judge will have to recuse her commie self.
‘That’s How Serious This Is’: Alan Dershowitz Says Jack Smith May Be Indicted If Trump Wins Case
https://dailycaller.com/2023/08/02/thats-how-serious-this-is-alan-dershowitz-says-jack-smith-may-be-indicted-if-trump-wins-case/
‘That’s How Serious This Is’: Alan Dershowitz Says Jack Smith May Be Indicted If Trump Wins Case
https://dailycaller.com/2023/08/02/thats-how-serious-this-is-alan-dershowitz-says-jack-smith-may-be-indicted-if-trump-wins-case/
16
Posted on 8/3/23 at 1:53 pm to Auburn1968
That’s Q level wishcasting
Posted on 8/3/23 at 2:02 pm to jamboybarry
Dershowitz will say anything these days for attention.
Posted on 8/3/23 at 2:05 pm to jamboybarry
I don't expect such a thing to happen, but as Dershowitz pointed out Jack O. Smith is violating the same law he is trying to charge Trump with.
The commie judge will have to recuse herself.
The commie judge will have to recuse herself.
Posted on 8/3/23 at 2:05 pm to Auburn1968
quote:
why the judge will have to recuse her commie self.
Will not happen. You should know this by now.
quote:
Jack Smith May Be Indicted If Trump Wins Case
Posted on 8/3/23 at 2:09 pm to mwade91383
Seems like you didn't watch the video.
Posted on 8/3/23 at 2:13 pm to Auburn1968
It is telling that no one is refuting what he said. They just come here throwing mud at Dershowitz.
Posted on 8/3/23 at 2:14 pm to Auburn1968
I'm not sure I care what Epstein's attorney says
Posted on 8/3/23 at 2:36 pm to Auburn1968
Dershowitz keeps claiming this is a First Amendment case. It is not. The indictment specifically states Trump has a right to voice his opinion about the election, and even lie about the election if he wants to. Trump is not being indicted for statements made in his Jan. 6 speech.
The First Amendment does not protect your right to commit a crime. If your speech is part of a fraudulent conspiracy, you aren't protected.
I think the indictment might be a stretch on fraud against the US, but you can expect to hear more evidence as co conspirators get charged in superceding indictments.
The First Amendment does not protect your right to commit a crime. If your speech is part of a fraudulent conspiracy, you aren't protected.
I think the indictment might be a stretch on fraud against the US, but you can expect to hear more evidence as co conspirators get charged in superceding indictments.
Posted on 8/3/23 at 2:41 pm to Dday63
quote:
The First Amendment does not protect your right to commit a crime. If your speech is part of a fraudulent conspiracy, you aren't protected.
The only fraudulent conspiracy to deny rights is the one Jack O. Smith has created. There has been a long line of those fraudulent conspiracies against Trump starting with Hillary's pee pee dossier and the Russia hoax.
Posted on 8/3/23 at 2:43 pm to Auburn1968
quote:
Jack Smith May Be Indicted
By who?
Posted on 8/3/23 at 2:44 pm to Auburn1968
quote:
That’s How Serious This Is’: Alan Dershowitz Says Jack Smith May Be Indicted If Trump Wins Case
Dershowitz is getting senile. Jack Smith could shite on the floor in front of the judge and the judge would have an officer of the court scoop it up and put it in a glass display case.
Then the democrats on Capitol Hill can take turns displaying it in their offices.
Posted on 8/3/23 at 2:53 pm to Auburn1968
quote:
The only fraudulent conspiracy to deny rights is the one Jack O. Smith has created
Good luck finding the "fraudulent" part.
Posted on 8/3/23 at 3:04 pm to Dday63
All jackass Dems are ignorant dumbshits and simply cannot help themselves.
Posted on 8/3/23 at 3:22 pm to jamboybarry
quote:
That’s Q level wishcasting
If this is what you believe than you have been conditioned to accept a two tier justice system and are a weak minded dem-lite or a fed.
Posted on 8/3/23 at 3:24 pm to Auburn1968
It’s legally consistent to do so if you follow the absurd indictment of Jack Smith.
But…that would require a Republican AG with balls.
Therefore, this is pure fantasy.
But…that would require a Republican AG with balls.
Therefore, this is pure fantasy.
Posted on 8/3/23 at 3:28 pm to Auburn1968
Jack Smith is the Apparatus designated hit man. Their Andrei Vyshinsky. Nothing’s gonna happen to him, except maybe being elevated to deputyAG.
Posted on 8/3/23 at 3:34 pm to Dday63
quote:
Dershowitz keeps claiming this is a First Amendment case. It is not. The indictment specifically
So a unknown poster knows more than a Harvard law professor who just happens to be an expert on constitutional law. Read that slowly and you will see how stupid your post is.
Posted on 8/3/23 at 3:36 pm to SOSFAN
Dersh is the new Giuliani. Old age - it can frick with you.
Posted on 8/3/23 at 3:36 pm to Dday63
quote:
Good luck finding the "fraudulent" part.
You can start with him leaving out parts where Trump said to assemble peacefully. That is fraud.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News