- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: A Fatal Flaw in the claim that the ("Obama") FBI was working against Trump being elected
Posted on 5/19/18 at 3:06 pm to texridder
Posted on 5/19/18 at 3:06 pm to texridder
quote:
So the FBI broke all these other laws that they are being accused of, but in the end, they weren't willing to make a simple triple-back-door leak of the mere fact that there was an investigation??? Not even remotely likely.
Have you read the Stroyk and Page emails?
Revealing that there was an investigation,would destroy their "insurance policy" in the very unlikely event that Trump got elected.
Ya see, in the very unlikely event that Trump was elected, they needed a way to make sure he either was never inaugurated or was impeached as the result of an investigation by another Deep State operative.....ya know, an "insurance policy".
Posted on 5/19/18 at 3:06 pm to IceTiger
quote:
They weren't investigating Russia...they were spying on Trump...Russia was the plant, there is no Russia
Ding, ding, ding, we have a winner!!!!!!!!!!
/Thread
Posted on 5/19/18 at 3:07 pm to McChowder
quote:
Obama and Clinton bought into the polling.
Nope. The polls were within the margin of error the last week.
And even so, instead of just making a back-door leak, which would have assured a victory, they saved it in the off-chance hope that could impeach Trump??? No way.
Posted on 5/19/18 at 3:08 pm to texridder
quote:
I should have known that you would have posted a factual response that was right on point that refuted my OP.
I bet a hundred bucks that you cannot diagram that sentence.
Posted on 5/19/18 at 3:09 pm to CptBengal
quote:
You think this is an actual argument
It must be, since you can't even attempt to refute it.
Posted on 5/19/18 at 3:10 pm to texridder
quote:
And even so, instead of just making a back-door leak, which would have assured a victory, they saved it in the off-chance hope that could impeach Trump??? No way
It was an insurance policy JUST IN CASE Trump won...after he won they shite bricks knowing they would (will) be exposed
Posted on 5/19/18 at 3:10 pm to texridder
I see the nyt "get ahead of the story with our spin" is working just as intended on the useful idiots.
Posted on 5/19/18 at 3:11 pm to texridder
quote:
e Obama administration did not disclose the fact that the Trump campaign was under investigation. In fact, the FBI floated a misleading story in the New York Times in October 2016 conveying the false impression that there was no investigation of the Trump campaign.
The evidence regarding "crossfire hurricane" indicates the feds were trying to avoid releasing info that would adversely affect the Trump campaign. Ironic, considering this board's wacked misinterpretation of the facts.
Posted on 5/19/18 at 3:12 pm to texridder
What a sad thread. It's an incredible spin to how awful this is.
If this was Trump the internet would crash and there would be riots in the street
If this was Trump the internet would crash and there would be riots in the street
Posted on 5/19/18 at 3:12 pm to texridder
What you claim is a fatal flaw is the absolute clandestine conspiracy of Clapper, Brennan, Comey,McCabe, Strozk,Paige and two other FBI moles to first prevent Trump’s election and then post election formed the conspiracy “insurance plan to sabotage Trump’s administration ‘ to try to get some crime pinned on Trump...
You and Clapper who falsely now states that the ‘FBI mspies were just trying to protect Trump’ are connected via the rectum spruing a BS volcano of smoke and hot gas...........

You and Clapper who falsely now states that the ‘FBI mspies were just trying to protect Trump’ are connected via the rectum spruing a BS volcano of smoke and hot gas...........
Posted on 5/19/18 at 3:16 pm to texridder
quote:
And even so, instead of just making a back-door leak, which would have assured a victory, they saved it in the off-chance hope that could impeach Trump??? No way
I’m just going to humor you.
What is more believable; “trump is trying to win by colluding with Russians” or “trump won by colluding with Russians.
This investigation doesn’t make any sense. Breaking it out before the election would have just been out of place. They haven’t been able to explain what he did, so what exactly would have been the story during the election?
This was the ammo for after the election. They fired plenty shots before it.
Posted on 5/19/18 at 3:19 pm to AUTiger1978
quote:
What if Glenn Greenwald or some other reporter was able to dig this info up before the election? Use a little common sense.
Yea, right. If they leaked it a week or two before the election, someone could have put this all together in that short a period of time.
You are the one who needs to use some common sense.
Posted on 5/19/18 at 3:20 pm to texridder
At this point, it isn’t a “claim”.
There is just mental gymnastics over if the plant was an “informant” put in place to “protect” Trump or a “spy” put in place to dig up dirt on Trump.
Do you seriously think Obama was trying to “help” Trump?
Remember the difference between Obama and Trump? At least Obama will go down as a President.
There is just mental gymnastics over if the plant was an “informant” put in place to “protect” Trump or a “spy” put in place to dig up dirt on Trump.
Do you seriously think Obama was trying to “help” Trump?
Remember the difference between Obama and Trump? At least Obama will go down as a President.
Posted on 5/19/18 at 3:23 pm to Strannix
quote:
A gave you a full well reasoned response, why don’t you reply to it
You stole that response from another poster, and I have already responded to his post.
Posted on 5/19/18 at 3:26 pm to Bunyan
quote:
Now he's downvoting everyone lol
Dude is triggered
If you are saying that I am downvoting, your just plain out lying.
Posted on 5/19/18 at 3:26 pm to texridder
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/10/21 at 5:32 am
Posted on 5/19/18 at 3:28 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
By law it is illegal to disclose counter- intel (Trump) investigation
You poor pitiful snowflake.......
It’s illegal to create false FISA warrants, drop two moles into a campaign and then do clandestine intel taps on an opposing political campaign before and after an US election of the people.......
After an election such political conduct is termed a ‘coup’......and it has been driven by the Deep State... think Clintonites, the Bush Crime Family , Soros and the globalists namely the Starbucks, the Googles, the Facebooks etc......
Posted on 5/19/18 at 3:32 pm to OceanMan
This is another good observation with regard to timing. It would have been too obvious what they were attempting. Releasing this so close to the election, right after publicly clearing HRC, would send up red flags in the electorate. Keep in mind, we already learned that the establishment had fixed the DNC primary against the other anti-establishment candidate. If they went out and appeared to put their thumb on the scale for HRC for a third time even more people sick of this establishment b.s. would have come out for Trump.
Posted on 5/19/18 at 3:36 pm to DallasTiger11
quote:
I think there’s less than 20 leftists in the country who honestly thought Trump might win. The polls are irrelevant.
We're not talking about voters.
The FBI had (according to Trump supporters) done all this highly illegal stuff, and all they had to do was make a tiny leak, and all of their transgressions would have been buried forever. But, they decided instead to risk it all.
Popular
Back to top



0








