- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
$355 million what is the justification?
Posted on 2/17/24 at 5:43 pm
Posted on 2/17/24 at 5:43 pm
Is this a number the judge pulled out of his arse or did he provide a reasoned accounting for how he determined this to be the correct amount of "damages"?
13
Posted on 2/17/24 at 5:45 pm to Geaux-2-L-O-Miss
Gotta get those funds for Ukraine somehow. The judges are in on it too!
Posted on 2/17/24 at 5:45 pm to Geaux-2-L-O-Miss
quote:In our system, there no longer need be justification, only a (D)etermination
$355 million what is the justification?
Posted on 2/17/24 at 5:46 pm to Geaux-2-L-O-Miss
quote:
Is this a number the judge pulled out of his arse or did he provide a reasoned accounting for how he determined this to be the correct amount of "damages"?
im actually curious about this too. I watched a video reviewing the judgements and it is like 30 judgements totaling the 355 mil.
Posted on 2/17/24 at 5:46 pm to Geaux-2-L-O-Miss
quote:
$355 million what is the justification?
Hate
Posted on 2/17/24 at 5:48 pm to Geaux-2-L-O-Miss
Supposedly interest and fees he would have paid under market terms, whatever the court seems that to be.
It’s a joke.
It’s a joke.
Posted on 2/17/24 at 5:48 pm to Geaux-2-L-O-Miss
ORANGE MAN BAD!
THAT IS WHY!
THAT IS WHY!
Posted on 2/17/24 at 5:52 pm to Geaux-2-L-O-Miss
quote:
what is the justification?
Posted on 2/17/24 at 5:53 pm to TerryDawg03
quote:
Supposedly interest and fees he would have paid under market terms, whatever the court seems that to be.
It’s a joke.
Especially since the loans were paid off on time and the lenders want to deal with him again.
This is the state of New York deciding that it wants to interfere in business because it knows better than businessmen and banks.
Posted on 2/17/24 at 5:53 pm to Geaux-2-L-O-Miss
It was her turn
Posted on 2/17/24 at 5:54 pm to TerryDawg03
quote:
Supposedly interest and fees he would have paid under market terms, whatever the court seems that to be.
It’s a joke.
But... if they banks did their due diligence, and I can assure you that they did, aren't they free to loan money under whatever reasonable terms they choose to?
Or do banks now have to run all of their loans by a prosecutor and judge who have zero financial knowledge and experience to make sure that, in their opinion, the banks are having a fast one pulled on them?
Posted on 2/17/24 at 6:03 pm to Geaux-2-L-O-Miss
I’m still not clear who he owes the money to. Is it NY state or the lenders he supposedly defrauded? The lenders don’t feel duped by him and weren’t the ones that brought the charges. If I had a substantial amount of money and a R by my name, I’d be cashing out of NY.
Posted on 2/17/24 at 6:11 pm to Geaux-2-L-O-Miss
Go down the list of who gets a cut.
That shite ads up.
That shite ads up.
Posted on 2/17/24 at 6:12 pm to teke184
quote:
This is the state of New York deciding that it wants to interfere in business because it knows better than businessmen and banks.
That’s all this is. It’s government interference in private transactions.
This post was edited on 2/17/24 at 6:13 pm
Posted on 2/17/24 at 6:13 pm to Geaux-2-L-O-Miss
100% tyranny
Anyone who doesn't see this or pretends not to see it is the problem.
Anyone who doesn't see this or pretends not to see it is the problem.
Posted on 2/17/24 at 6:19 pm to auggie
quote:
Go down the list of who gets a cut.
Do you have a link to said "list"?
Posted on 2/17/24 at 6:23 pm to teke184
quote:
This is the state of New York deciding that it wants to interfere in business because it knows better than businessmen and banks.
The banks have to pissed about this right?
This seems like it's going to backfire spectacularly.
Posted on 2/17/24 at 6:28 pm to Geaux-2-L-O-Miss
Judge used some expert guys opinion that the interest rates charge on some of the loans would have been higher had Trump not been able to get the personal guarantee with his “fraudulent” financial statements. And the difference is quite staggering. And the rationale is complete BS. That amounted to about $165 million.
Then another $128 million or so came from the profit made on selling the Old Post office building. Again because the loan used to purchase and Renovate was made with fraud records. All BS.
Private transactions and no victims. Basic banking activity that happens every day
Then another $128 million or so came from the profit made on selling the Old Post office building. Again because the loan used to purchase and Renovate was made with fraud records. All BS.
Private transactions and no victims. Basic banking activity that happens every day
Posted on 2/17/24 at 8:06 pm to BlueDogTiger
Poor Trump, Everyone is picking on him, why can't he just run his businesses as illegally and fraudulently as he wants to with out having to abide all those laws 
Posted on 2/17/24 at 8:29 pm to Geaux-2-L-O-Miss
quote:
Do you have a link to said "list"?
That would never be allowed on the interweb.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News