Started By
Message

re: Trump just announced ordering DOJ to look at banning bump stocks

Posted on 2/20/18 at 6:06 pm to
Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 2/20/18 at 6:06 pm to
quote:

am curious to the wording of a ban that would allow that to happen. It does not meet the definition of a machine gun, it is one pull of the trigger, one bullet.




I don’t think legally they can be banned without a massive rewrite of existing law.
Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 2/20/18 at 6:10 pm to
quote:

What can i do? N


Contact your elected officials. Join a pro-gun rights organization. Vote.

And perhaps more importantly: Take a new, non-gun person shooting.

I’m not picking on you, just answering the question for others who might be wondering the same thing.
This post was edited on 2/20/18 at 6:17 pm
Posted by The Rodfather
I'm not really sure?
Member since Nov 2008
3941 posts
Posted on 2/20/18 at 7:04 pm to
Most young people aren’t introduced to the firearm world by buying their first gun at 18. It starts much younger with responsible hunter / shooter parents.

I’m starting to get on board with upping the purchasing age for guns to 21 or maybe shotguns, non- semi auto center fire, and rim fire to 18 with all others to 21. But in return the voting age gets moved to 21. If we can’t responsibly buy a firearm at 21, how can we be mature enough to be responsible for the direction of the entire US?
Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 2/20/18 at 7:15 pm to
quote:

I’m starting to get on board with upping the purchasing age for guns to 21 or maybe shotguns, non- semi auto center fire, and rim fire to 18 with all others to 21.


Just a couple of points to consider:

- Most gun deaths in the US happen with a .22LR, which is surprising but true
- Could I gift my 18 year old son an AR15 for graduation?
- Teens without parents around, of which there are increasingly many, could be frozen out of the firearms hobby. The antis definitely want kids to be increasingly isolated from fireams altogether so that they won’t oppose gun control legislation.

And to that last point, I think this is an interesting hypothetical: Say all teens for the last 30 years or so had been taken out to shoot an AR15 recreationally, or any gun, and been tought about the function and safe operation of those guns. How many today would believe the AR or other guns should be banned? I am guessing a low percentage.
This post was edited on 2/20/18 at 7:16 pm
Posted by oleyeller
Vols, Bitch
Member since Oct 2012
32604 posts
Posted on 2/20/18 at 7:20 pm to
quote:

I’m starting to get on board with upping the purchasing age for guns to 21 or maybe shotguns, non- semi auto center fire, and rim fire to 18 with all others to 21. But in return the voting age gets moved to 21. If we can’t responsibly buy a firearm at 21, how can we be mature enough to be responsible for the direction of the entire US?

only if up age to join militart to 21
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
138925 posts
Posted on 2/20/18 at 7:30 pm to
quote:

It didn't take Jake Tapper on CNN 10 minutes after Trump made the renouncement to say this was a political stunt. You're correct in he will get 0 credit from the left for enacting any type of restrictions.

Well, if that's the case then keep them legal. frick em.
Posted by The Rodfather
I'm not really sure?
Member since Nov 2008
3941 posts
Posted on 2/20/18 at 7:54 pm to
I thought of that too, but some people need the military out of high School to provide a living and possibly go to college. Doing this may actually effect their life in a pretty large way.
Posted by The Rodfather
I'm not really sure?
Member since Nov 2008
3941 posts
Posted on 2/20/18 at 7:56 pm to
Yes you could give your child a firearm. Just like I could give my son a pistol at 15 (or whenever I deem he is mature enough) currently. It is a purchase (from store) age. Not an own age.

Don’t fool yourself. A lot of those parentless (fatherless) kids have access and have used guns way before legal purchase age.
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
28580 posts
Posted on 2/20/18 at 8:01 pm to
Good. Don’t serve any good purpose.
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
48992 posts
Posted on 2/20/18 at 8:28 pm to
the AR15 is going to be the hill that both sides commit to dying on.
this rifle/carbine is designed to kill armed combatants as efficiently as possible and unfortunately has been recently the weapon of choice for those committed to killing even more efficiently unarmed non combatants

yes it's awesome and fun to shoot.
yes it's accurate and lends itself well to sport shooting
Yes it's affordable and endlessly adaptable

it's going to be the event horizon for 2nd amendment rights. Yes you can yell "what about the mini 14" or similar but it's the AR being used to commit mass murder and perception is what counts. I personally don't own one and if tomorrow it was banned my life and pursuit of happiness would be unchanged.

this bump stock BS is just window dressing. Nobody wants schools being riddled with bullets. This is going to change whether we like it or not
Posted by SportTiger1
Stonewall, LA
Member since Feb 2007
29860 posts
Posted on 2/20/18 at 8:49 pm to
I think the bump stock stuff is a compromise. And believe it or not, trump was voted in to 'make good deals'...ie compromise.

Don't get me wrong, it won't change a thing...but if it shuts them up for 5 years, oh well.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
95648 posts
Posted on 2/20/18 at 8:54 pm to
quote:

Don't get me wrong, it won't change a thing...but if it shuts them up for 5 years, oh well.




It won't though - once they win on demonizing the "device" (in this case, not even a weapon, but an accessory), then they'll push to ban the weapon next time.

Then all weapons. Then, they'll revoke the grandfathered ones. At some point, you'll be a lawbreaker or a revolutionary simply by doing what you've always done - what our great-great-great grandfathers have done. That is what is at stake - us remaining America or becoming another failing European socialist state.
Posted by SportTiger1
Stonewall, LA
Member since Feb 2007
29860 posts
Posted on 2/20/18 at 9:03 pm to
quote:

then they'll push to ban the weapon next time.

Well IF that happens, draw your line in the sand. I'll be right there with you.

The issue won't go away though. There will be a dem in the WH, probably after trump sadly...and eventually they will have a majority in both chambers. Your best prayer at that point is that the issue isn't a big deal at that point.

Not sure there is a true fix on either side
Posted by bapple
Capital City
Member since Oct 2010
12232 posts
Posted on 2/20/18 at 9:08 pm to
quote:

yes it's awesome and fun to shoot.
yes it's accurate and lends itself well to sport shooting
Yes it's affordable and endlessly adaptable



Yes it's one of the most effective self defense weapons for almost anyone
Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 2/20/18 at 9:10 pm to
Just another point: This latest shooter was the only teenager out of all the shooters in recent memory.

Dylan Roof was 21 and didn’t use an AR
Lanza was 20
LV guy was old
Cho was 23 and didn’t use an AR

I guess I am wondering why the age limit is so important given these latest examples? 3 out of 5 were over 21, Lanza was almost 21.
This post was edited on 2/20/18 at 9:11 pm
Posted by The Rodfather
I'm not really sure?
Member since Nov 2008
3941 posts
Posted on 2/20/18 at 9:40 pm to
I’m not it necessarily for the age thing. If there is or has to be a “compromise” I currently would just prefer moving age to 21 then changing what falls into what NFA regulations or banning anything in particular. I personally believe that moving the age to 21 for purchase would open less of a Pandora’s box (ie, I couldn’t see the narrative switching to “25!” because nothing else is pushed to that age) than if we add something else to a “ban” list (ie, “stocks aren’t enough, national magazine capacity, no “assault rifles”, all black guns should be regulated”...)

ETA: I guess what I’m saying is some compromises are compromises, and some compromises are simply stepping stones to one sides greater agenda.
This post was edited on 2/20/18 at 9:42 pm
Posted by ChatRabbit77
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2013
5905 posts
Posted on 2/20/18 at 10:34 pm to
I'm curious, why are so many of you ok with compromise? You think this will get the leftists to shut up for a moment? When the next shooting happens then they will say that these bans did nothing so now they want all guns banned. I'm barely 21 and it's sad that even I understand that there is no compromise with the leftists more than some of you who have been around much longer. Compromise got us so many stupid pieces of legislation thinking the leftists would stop and shut up. Obviously it hasnt gotten us anywhere.
Posted by SportTiger1
Stonewall, LA
Member since Feb 2007
29860 posts
Posted on 2/20/18 at 10:57 pm to
You are probably right. But what's the play from the right? Just keep saying nope nope nope?

What happens when they don't control anything? I'm much more in favor of addressing mental health issues, but even that can be a very slippery slope when it comes to purchasing firearms.

Fact is, conservatives(myself) see shootings like this as a price we have to pay for freedom, as horrible as they are.

The left will never comprehend something like that.

People had access to weapons since the beginning but, society, media, crazy people have changed.
Posted by Kino74
Denham springs
Member since Nov 2013
5360 posts
Posted on 2/20/18 at 11:01 pm to
quote:

You are probably right. But what's the play from the right? Just keep saying nope nope nope? 


I can see improvement to background checks and reevaluation of how law enforcement handle situations like this. Too many times we have seen federal law enforcement fall on their face and the people pay a high price.
Posted by ChatRabbit77
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2013
5905 posts
Posted on 2/20/18 at 11:03 pm to
quote:

You are probably right. But what's the play from the right? Just keep saying nope nope nope?

Yes. And elect people who are more pro 2A so we can repeal things like the NFA.
quote:

Fact is, conservatives(myself) see shootings like this as a price we have to pay for freedom, as horrible as they are.

Absolutely. You just have to fight back against shooters. There is no banning anything. It's a reality of living in this country.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram