Started By
Message

re: Would the South have voluntarily end Slavery

Posted on 1/13/17 at 1:39 pm to
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
56769 posts
Posted on 1/13/17 at 1:39 pm to
We are the spawn of Yakub, after all.
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
60078 posts
Posted on 1/13/17 at 1:43 pm to
I'm actually 1/32 Native American
Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
64011 posts
Posted on 1/13/17 at 1:59 pm to
quote:

Technology would have ended the need for mass human labor.


Which is why burger flippers wanting 15 bucks an hour had better keep their collective mouths shut.
Posted by Masterag
'Round Dallas
Member since Sep 2014
20260 posts
Posted on 1/13/17 at 2:00 pm to
quote:

The largest myth about the Civil War is that it was fought to end slavery.





Why was it fought, then?

You do know that literally every Southern state declared in its declaration of secession that the main reason for doing it is so they could continue slavery, right?

That's a fact, not an opinion. You can look it up.
Posted by rd280z
Richmond
Member since Jan 2007
2519 posts
Posted on 1/13/17 at 2:12 pm to
I think so in time but the rich would still have house keepers, etc. but pay them a wage.
Posted by Tiger Prawn
Member since Dec 2016
26317 posts
Posted on 1/13/17 at 2:16 pm to
quote:

Would it have ever ended if the South won.


Yes, once they realized it was cheaper to hire illegal Mexicans than to buy slaves
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
64539 posts
Posted on 1/13/17 at 2:19 pm to
quote:

You do know that literally every Southern state declared in its declaration of secession that the main reason for doing it is so they could continue slavery, right?


Literally?

quote:

That's a fact


Is it?
Posted by sugar71
NOLA
Member since Jun 2012
9967 posts
Posted on 1/13/17 at 2:20 pm to
quote:

Every other nation on earth ended slavery without having a war that killed over half a million people. This includes nations like Brazil, where slavery was as entrenched as it was in the South. Brazil ended slavery only two decades after the Civil War.




Haiti was close with over 300,000 killed at least.


Brazil was by Royal decree by a Queen & would have continued without it.



So what the Neo Confederates are saying is ..." just take a few more generations of the most brutal exploitation & we will probably end it someday"....?




MLK always spoke of the " fierce urgency of NOW".

" The time is always right to do what's right"-MLK


The end of slavery was decades overdue.

Posted by WHS
walker LA.
Member since Feb 2006
3525 posts
Posted on 1/13/17 at 2:23 pm to
quote:

quote: The largest myth about the Civil War is that it was fought to end slavery. Why was it fought, then? You do know that literally every Southern state declared in its declaration of secession that the main reason for doing it is so they could continue slavery, right? That's a fact, not an opinion. You can look it up.


Sorry, but the civil War was fought over states rights. Lincoln made it about slavery.

States rights

I have a degree in Social studies education.

Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57015 posts
Posted on 1/13/17 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

Sorry, but the civil War was fought over states rights. Lincoln made it about slavery.


The civil war was fought because of succession, succession was because of slavery.

quote:

I have a degree in Social studies education.


sad
This post was edited on 1/13/17 at 2:29 pm
Posted by Tiger Prawn
Member since Dec 2016
26317 posts
Posted on 1/13/17 at 2:31 pm to
quote:

quote:
On another note I feel that the war could have been avoided if there would have been a Compensated emancipation. This was done in other countries when they were ending slavery. Though it was wrong, slavery was part of the era, and slave owners had a lot of money invested in the slaves they owned. I think that could have been a better use of government's money than trying to set up a colony in Africa(Liberia) to send the freed slaves.


quote:

That's a pretty racist sentiment. You favor giving money to the white people instead of letting the victims go free? Africa would be a major industrialized world power if we had not taken their best and brightest and scattered them to the wind!


No, what he's trying to say is that had the federal government said they were abolishing slavery while compensating the former slave owners, it may have helped avoid the Civil War. Think about it...most of the wealthy and powerful people in the Confederate states were slave owners. And they were pissed off that the northerners were trying to free all their slaves, which would've resulted in huge financial losses for those slave owners who had invested big money in buying slaves. By offering compensation for the freed slaves, it would soften the financial blow to the former slave owners, which gives them less reason to take up arms and go to war with the north.

I see what he was trying to say, but don't think it would've worked because the Emancipation Proclamation didn't happen until nearly 2 years into the Civil War...and was likely more of a strategic move by Lincoln to attempt to disrupt the southern slave-based economy than a humanitarian move.
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
30719 posts
Posted on 1/13/17 at 2:32 pm to
Slavery didnt' end. I got a buddy that has about 10 slaves right now that have been working in the cane fields the last few months. they live in a house on their property and they feed them everyday, 3 meals, and pay them very little, most of which they send back to their families to Mexico.
Posted by WHS
walker LA.
Member since Feb 2006
3525 posts
Posted on 1/13/17 at 2:37 pm to
NYCAuburn

I guess my professor who taught at West Point for 13 years and wrote most of the books used nation wide as reading material for american military history and the American civil war is wrong.
This post was edited on 1/13/17 at 2:39 pm
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57015 posts
Posted on 1/13/17 at 2:38 pm to
quote:

Slavery didnt' end. I got a buddy that has about 10 slaves right now that have been working in the cane fields the last few months. they live in a house on their property and they feed them everyday, 3 meals, and pay them very little, most of which they send back to their families to Mexico.


I have a friend whose parents have roughly "40-50" slaves in Ethiopia. The slaves are Somalians. She doesnt call them slaves , but they are essentially slaves
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57015 posts
Posted on 1/13/17 at 2:40 pm to
quote:

I guess my professor who taught at West Point for 13 years and wrote most of the books used nation wide as reading material for american military history and the American civil war is wrong.




Well considering the State right they were particularly fighting for was slavery, your statement was wrong.

Posted by WHS
walker LA.
Member since Feb 2006
3525 posts
Posted on 1/13/17 at 2:42 pm to
NYCAuburn

I see what you are saying I could have reworded it.
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
71132 posts
Posted on 1/13/17 at 3:39 pm to
The tractors and mechanical harvesters are largely forgotten for their role in the great diaspora of African Americans from the Mississippi delta because of The 1927 Flood. While that flood was at least partially responsible for the massive wave of Delta Blacks moving to industrial cities in the north, it was really the last straw. The advent of the fossil fuel-powered tractor and mechanical harvesters had rendered large scale agricultural largely obsolete.
Those technologies had finally begun supplanting black laborers in the 1920s. The Great Flood was what convinced many to leave because their livelihoods were already gone.
Posted by Bench McElroy
Member since Nov 2009
34684 posts
Posted on 1/13/17 at 3:41 pm to
quote:

voluntarily end Slavery


Has it ever really ended?
Posted by McLemore
Member since Dec 2003
35515 posts
Posted on 1/13/17 at 3:57 pm to
quote:

. I just decided to condense it into one thread on the actual holiday.


I prefer it in multiple parts. E.g., Part I: Plagiarism. Part II: Unearned Doctorate. Part III: Spousal Abuse. Part IV: Whore Mongering Pastor.

Sort of like you'd do with Jimmy Sawaggart, who was rightfully disgraced instead of honored with a national holiday.
Posted by McLemore
Member since Dec 2003
35515 posts
Posted on 1/13/17 at 4:01 pm to
quote:

The civil war was fought because of succession, succession was because of slavery. 


Really dude? All I know about successions is that Yiannopoulos (A.N., not the gay) told me once that Max Nathan ruined it.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram