Started By
Message

re: Why haven’t we gotten rid of DEF yet?

Posted on 1/3/26 at 9:47 pm to
Posted by BoogaBear
Member since Jul 2013
7338 posts
Posted on 1/3/26 at 9:47 pm to
quote:

Who’s bashing diesels? I own 2 knowing full and well only one of them is needed. I also own 4 other cars I don’t even need. But I can be honest with myself without getting offended like the baws that where their smoke rolling program on their sleeve.


Not directed at you, the same folks come jumping out every time there is a thread on diesels or 3/4 ton trucks.

Lots of opinions, few with factual basis.
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
30337 posts
Posted on 1/3/26 at 9:51 pm to
quote:

what exactly does DEF do?


Makes ding dongs feel good about diesel trucks not billowing black smoke out the exhaust.

My Ram 1/2 ton ecodiesel is deleted. I get 24 mpg in the city, and 28 mpg going 85 on the interstate.
Posted by PhilipMarlowe
Member since Mar 2013
21922 posts
Posted on 1/3/26 at 9:53 pm to
Washrooms smell
They could be cleaner
Stench of cigarettes
And stale urea
I love you all


Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
72087 posts
Posted on 1/3/26 at 9:59 pm to
quote:

Makes ding dongs feel good about diesel trucks not billowing black smoke out the exhaust.


Nope, that's what the DPF and high pressure common rail fuel system does.

For on-highway vehicles selective catalytic reduction makes the most sense out of everything. You get drastic NOx reduction just for skeeting urea over a catalyst bed. No more shitload of EGR. No more horrible timing maps. No more dumb shite.

Like I said earlier, yall are hating on the wrong shite. DEF injection as a form of NOx reduction is excellent. Its all the other ceap that sucks
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
18032 posts
Posted on 1/3/26 at 10:10 pm to
quote:

Nope, that's what the DPF and high pressure common rail fuel system does.

DPF agreed. Especially the stupid cat version with that stupid ard head. I don’t hate common rail because I like making mad power. I would add EGR after owning a 6.0 even though I know the egr wasn’t actually the root cause. I still find it irritating and unnecessarily complex like many things in modern cars.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
95632 posts
Posted on 1/4/26 at 5:01 am to
quote:

They're in their late 60's.


Pump the brakes, my guy. Phil is 68 and Joe is 66, but Sav is 65, Viv is 63 and Rick is 62.

The average age of the band is under 65 (until later this year, at least).

So, why don't you pour some sugar on that?
Posted by jnethe1
Pearland
Member since Dec 2012
17814 posts
Posted on 1/4/26 at 5:10 am to
quote:

Roughly the same % for 4wd trucks


I have a 4wd. No I don’t use it everyday. Why? Because we live a country with highways and relatively good infrastructure compared to the rest of the world. With that said, I have used the 4wd feature about 12 times total. And I am so thankful for having it for those particular occasions. I’d rather have it and not need it, than need it and not have it.
Posted by subMOA
Komatipoort
Member since Jan 2010
2040 posts
Posted on 1/4/26 at 6:19 am to
It’s actually a Bush era policy.

Please tell me how DEF screws up engines when the SCR system is an aftertreatment process?

Now, it you wanna talk about EGR, VGTs, and all the other stuff that works in conjunction with the SCR system, I’ll grant you that. But your post makes you sound like a dumbass.

Also, Tier 4 final regs reduced the amount of emissions 90% vs. where we were in 1998 when this was all launched. So, to say it does nothing is patently false.

Do we need it at this level? Not sure. I disagree with it on off road vehicles. But semi trucks idling in Baton Rouge rush hour traffic- absolutely 100%
Posted by The Torch
DFW The Dub
Member since Aug 2014
29579 posts
Posted on 1/4/26 at 6:25 am to
Rolling Coal ON Liberals Is Awesome

[/img]
Posted by King
Deep in the backwoods
Member since Sep 2008
18681 posts
Posted on 1/4/26 at 7:46 am to
If DEF helps with that God awful diesel exhaust smell, im all for it. That smell makes me nauseous. I hate getting behind a diesel vehicle with that smell.
Posted by Meauxjeaux
102836 posts including my alters
Member since Jun 2005
46889 posts
Posted on 1/4/26 at 7:54 am to
quote:

90% of people driving vehicles that require DEF do not have a need for that vehicle. I don’t feel sorry for them.


You one of those “according to his needs” guys?

FTR I don’t own a vehicle that needs DEF, my skin in this game is principle.
Posted by jeffsdad
Member since Mar 2007
24869 posts
Posted on 1/4/26 at 8:11 am to
Soccerfit with the correct answer. It would be tough without DEF, maybe just adapt the Hawaian alphabet.
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
41085 posts
Posted on 1/4/26 at 8:16 am to
quote:

I hate freedom of choice and love when government dictates to me what I can do or buy.


This is actually a very popular opinion on TD
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
18032 posts
Posted on 1/4/26 at 8:26 am to
quote:

I have a 4wd. No I don’t use it everyday. Why? Because we live a country with highways and relatively good infrastructure compared to the rest of the world. With that said, I have used the 4wd feature about 12 times total. And I am so thankful for having it for those particular occasions. I’d rather have it and not need it, than need it and not have it.

I really enjoy every time I’ve posted this data because it immediately makes people justify something that isn’t even being asked for.
Posted by Twenty 49
Shreveport
Member since Jun 2014
21345 posts
Posted on 1/4/26 at 8:36 am to
From McPherson Oil Products:

quote:

When Commercial Fuel Services Started Including DEF

For years, truck drivers and fleet managers didn’t have to worry about smog-proof equipment on their vehicles. Come 2008, the EPA mandated that all three-quarter-ton and larger trucks had diesel particulate filters installed.

Then, the EPA tightened the restrictions even more in 2010. The agency required medium- and heavy-duty vehicles to step it up a notch by reducing engine emissions, especially for NOx and particular matter (PM) by incorporating DEF.

Why the EPA Changed Regulations for Commercial Trucks

The purpose of these new regulations was to ultimately improve air quality. NOx and PM are linked to respiratory and cardiovascular diseases, as well as asthma, acute respiratory symptoms, chronic bronchitis, and decreased lung function.

The agency predicts that these changes will prevent 8,300 premature deaths, greater than 9,500 hospitalizations, and 1.5 million lost work days due to sickness. This comes to a total savings of $70.3 billion by 2030.
Posted by dalefla
Central FL
Member since Jul 2024
4119 posts
Posted on 1/4/26 at 8:37 am to
Same reason we haven't killed ethanol. Lobbyist.
Posted by N2cars
Member since Feb 2008
39623 posts
Posted on 1/4/26 at 8:43 am to
Idiots like that are one of the primary reasons why the EPA tightened the emmissons standards.
Posted by jnethe1
Pearland
Member since Dec 2012
17814 posts
Posted on 1/4/26 at 8:49 am to
quote:

I really enjoy every time I’ve posted this data because it immediately makes people justify something that isn’t even being asked for.


You offered criticism of people’s decisions. Simply trying to provide the rationale behind it. Why this made you upset I have no idea.
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
18032 posts
Posted on 1/4/26 at 8:55 am to
quote:

You offered criticism of people’s decisions.

Which part is criticism?
Posted by jnethe1
Pearland
Member since Dec 2012
17814 posts
Posted on 1/4/26 at 9:06 am to
quote:

70ish percent of personally owned trucks never or rarely tow anything. Roughly the same % for 4wd trucks that never go off-road and about 35% for never or rarely hauling anything. Rarely is typically defined as once or less per year in the data I’ve seen.


What would this be defined as in your opinion?
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram