Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Why has architecture, design, and fashion changed so drastically from say pre WW2 to now?

Posted on 6/4/26 at 7:47 am
Posted by Mike da Tigah
Bravo Romeo Lima Alpha
Member since Feb 2005
61837 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 7:47 am
I don’t think one has to be anything more than simply observant to recognize the shift that has taken place over time from valuing form to simply function alone in so much of our architecture, the vehicles we purchase, and even the clothes we wear to generations pre WW2 or thereabouts.

There are obviously major advancements that have taken place in technology and materials especially which have played a role, but it’s not as if people prefer the looks of some brutalist building to a building with character and interest, or a vehicle that serves a purpose but lacks an interesting design that moves you, or fashion that serves a purpose but without much in the lines of class to draw from. Does this say something about our society on a whole in what we value, or has what we valued been driven by someone or something else?

Some stark examples to compare/contrast are say

BRHS built in 1926


Liberty High School (Lee for the older folks like myself) Built in 2016




1958 Cadillac Seville


2026 Cadillac CT5



Average way men used to dress leaving the house


The way in which most American men leave the house today, and I feel as if I’m being more than generous.
Posted by UptownJoeBrown
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2024
10203 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 7:51 am to
Civil Rights era in the 60s and then the Vietnam war with the hippies.
This post was edited on 6/4/26 at 7:53 am
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
59314 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 7:51 am to
There are people that control the media, academia, and a big portion of finance that have a vested interest in seeing America fail and it all trickles down from there



Not naming any names of course
Posted by Hangover Haven
Metry
Member since Oct 2013
33831 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 7:51 am to
It's called "minimalizing"

Look at the original Cotton Exchange building in New Orleans built in 1883 with all the ornate statues on the building...



Look at it today...



This post was edited on 6/4/26 at 7:56 am
Posted by Mike da Tigah
Bravo Romeo Lima Alpha
Member since Feb 2005
61837 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 7:58 am to
It’s as if they planned on the building saying something about them and they wanted to stick around a while.
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
46331 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 7:59 am to
Rampant fagg0try.
Posted by jefforize
Member since Feb 2008
45944 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 8:01 am to
building things that look like shite make the local populace feel less connection to the area, thus they are easier to control
Posted by Strannix
C.S.A.
Member since Dec 2012
53794 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 8:01 am to
The destruction of art is a tenet of International Bolshevism.
Posted by kengel2
Team Gun
Member since Mar 2004
33759 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 8:05 am to
quote:

It's called "minimalizing"


I call it maximizing profits.
Posted by LSU4ever2002
Member since Sep 2009
730 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 8:05 am to
Costs

It would cost a fortune to build something new like the St. Louis cathedral.

Posted by Mike da Tigah
Bravo Romeo Lima Alpha
Member since Feb 2005
61837 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 8:07 am to
quote:

building things that look like shite make the local populace feel less connection to the area, thus they are easier to control


Schools look like soulless robot factories and factories are obviously the byproduct of the training in the schools. It’s all quite dystopian if you ask me.

Posted by thegreatboudini
Member since Oct 2008
7209 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 8:07 am to
quote:

The way in which most American men leave the house today, and I feel as if I’m being more than generous.


Have you been to an airport recently?

You're being unrealisticly generous.
This post was edited on 6/4/26 at 8:08 am
Posted by thegambler
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2012
2162 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 8:10 am to
lazy people.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
59473 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 8:21 am to
There are different drivers for each.

For cars, the drive (heh!) became for more aerodynamics, especially once CAFE Standards came into play (cars in 1978, light trucks in 1982).

For clothing style it started with the Baby Boomers and their counter-culture movement in the 1960s and 1970s. That dovetailed into the adoption of newer textiles from the 1970s-1990s (stretch fabrics and synthetic blends were generally easier to care for while also looking more casual). This bled into the 1990s-through today where the push has been for more casual dress in the workplace (especially in the tech culture).

For architecture, in the wake of WW2 building materials (especially in Europe) were at a bit of a premium, especially for housing. This rippled out to impact buildings of all sorts. Architects of the time like Le Corbusier, Banham, etc. were able to capitalize on this with their "truth to materials" mindset, which meant the building’s structural elements, plumbing, and mechanical workings were often left visible rather than hidden behind drywall or plaster. This also meant focusing on function far more than form (resulting in more blockiness and straight lines) which also appealed to the counter-culture movement (which helped speed up adoption).

While the easy answer is "muh Boomers," the more accurate answer how varying catalysts came together to influence them along with how they appealed to Boomers.
Posted by DonJuanDaMiles
San Diego, CA
Member since Feb 2014
1524 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 8:23 am to
I think most of our “plain” building were built under the philosophy of some Russian-American guy who believed productivity would be highest in plain looking buildings in spaces that wouldn’t distract people from their work. I think time has taught us the opposite to be true, but the guy’s name escapes me. Let me do a mid post Google search…Albert Kahn is perhaps who I’m thinking of
Posted by Shexter
Prairieville
Member since Feb 2014
20937 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 8:45 am to

It's somewhat of shrinkflation in the construction world. Cheaper costs turns to greater profit margin.
Posted by Tree_Fall
Member since Mar 2021
1270 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:14 am to
Appearances can deceive.
Many of those ornate old buildings had bolt on cast iron facades that corroded so badly they started falling into the street. Elegant interiors were painted plaster. Few were built to last.

Preformed/stressed concrete beams and panels along with hanging sheet walls did a lot to make minimalism the accepted price point.

That big old Caddie was falling apart after 2 years, long before today's common 100k miles cars.
Posted by cypresstiger
The South
Member since Aug 2008
14138 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:15 am to
architecture, design, and fashion
—Change constantly
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram