Started By
Message

re: Why has architecture, design, and fashion changed so drastically from say pre WW2 to now?

Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:18 am to
Posted by saltybulldog
MS Gulf Coast
Member since Aug 2007
1159 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:18 am to
Capitalism optimizes for profit not aesthetic and cultural value.

A lot of the early leaders of various societies had vision and an interest in architecture.
Posted by DesScorp
Alabama
Member since Sep 2017
10381 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:28 am to
quote:

The destruction of art is a tenet of International Bolshevism.


As far as the ugliness of architecture goes, you’re absolutely correct about this stuff having roots in Marxism. Most-post WWII architecture traces its roots to the Bauhaus movement in post Great War Germany. Those men were a “collective” and heavily influenced by Marxist concepts. It was basically an architecture cult with Bolshevik ideas and they even required members to eat a “non-bourgeois diet” for a time. Mies van der Rohe, who saddled us with so many of our ugly soulless glass and steel boxes, was a student of the movement. The Bauhaus bunch considered beauty and ornament to be a kind of secular sin, and “starting from zero” was the only acceptable ethos in building. Read Tom Wolfe’s From Bauhaus to Our House. It’s the best indictment of postwar architecture ever put to paper.
Posted by RoyalAir
Detroit
Member since Dec 2012
7563 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:38 am to
quote:

While the easy answer is "muh Boomers," the more accurate answer how varying catalysts came together to influence them along with how they appealed to Boomers.


I don't think anyone is blaming Boomers. This stuff started before they had any level of institutional control. They were also raised all around the cold war brutalism of things, and as such, didn't really pay attention to it. It's the fish in water scenario.

Younger generations are going through something of a Renaissance, where they see what their people once were, and are starting to gravitate towards it. It'll be interesting to see what Zoomer and Alpha architects start building when they're fully of age.
Posted by LSUFreek
Greater New Orleans
Member since Jan 2007
16318 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:38 am to
The Suit was always a status symbol for power, particularly at work. But then casual Friday made it optional. Silicone Valley billionaires & sheep made it embarrassing. The Pandemic made it unnecessary. And soft/casual wear slowly became the new work uniform. Unfortunately, the suit is currently just for rituals (funerals, weddings, judge verdicts, etc...)

So, it's not dead & it may make a comeback. A suit now speaks loudly as a rebel/non-conformist. Some tycoon/celebrity/influencer will standout & probably revive the trend.
Posted by Mike da Tigah
Bravo Romeo Lima Alpha
Member since Feb 2005
61840 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:41 am to
quote:

architecture, design, and fashion
—Change constantly


Clearly, but not usually for the worst. If anything, I think it is a reflection of society changing, or perhaps being changed. It’s not organic as if it’s the people’s choice.

Go back to the renaissance and you will see a people with grandiose visions and wonder reflected in their architecture. Go back even further in time and you see impressive structures we still have today, because they’re made of materials that stand the test of time. Go back to 13th century Europe and you can see what people were saying in the architecture they designed and built that still stand today.

Now, FF to today and only a few decades after they were built you can see whole swaths of vacant strip malls that litter America with homeless people defecating outside their abandoned shells. What were those who built those things saying except make as much money as you can, consume to make more money, and then move along like a locust colony, leaving a trail of destruction in their wake. Pure unadulterated selfishness if you ask me, with no pause or concern for the future of the place they built. It may be the world in which we find ourselves living, but I certainly do not think people necessarily consciously selected this for themselves.

In 200 to 300 years, if humanity survives, what will future generations have to go on that we were actually here in 2026? What buildings we have built today do you suppose will still be standing to tell our tale?





Posted by greenbean
USAF Retired - 31 years
Member since Feb 2019
6435 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:43 am to
Just more of evidence of our decline as a society. There are beautiful courthouses all over the south, built after the CW when the south was dirt poor, that are still standing and functional today and many haven't had much renovation.

There's plenty of houses still standing and still lived in that are over 100 years old. I doubt many homes built today will fare that well.

Our ancestors were smarter than we are today.
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
78605 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:44 am to
quote:

It’s as if they planned on the building saying something about them and they wanted to stick around a while


In the instance of the cotton exchange the original building was deemed unsafe after 30 years because the structure was not built to last.
Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
84849 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:45 am to
That new Cadillac looks great
Posted by Mike da Tigah
Bravo Romeo Lima Alpha
Member since Feb 2005
61840 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:47 am to
quote:

That new Cadillac looks great


Wait 60 years and see if anyone cares though.
Posted by chinhoyang
Member since Jun 2011
26103 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 10:14 am to
quote:

Civil Rights era in the 60s and then the Vietnam war with the hippies


We dropped a lot of standards during that time period. Decorum, courtesy and propriety are greatly diminished. We are an entitled and selfish society, with way too many people with substance abuse and untreated mental health issues.

Posted by IAmNERD
Member since May 2017
24300 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 10:19 am to
quote:

I call it maximizing profits.

Nailed it.

The almighty dollar is king. If these corporations can save some money by building a bland box instead of a building with a little character by removing anything not crucial to the function of the building, they will do it every time.
Posted by TheHarahanian
Actually not Harahan as of 6/2023
Member since May 2017
23983 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 10:22 am to


$$$
Posted by Crowknowsbest
Member since May 2012
26971 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 10:26 am to
quote:

The almighty dollar is king. If these corporations can save some money by building a bland box instead of a building with a little character by removing anything not crucial to the function of the building, they will do it every time.

This cuts both ways though. If consumers/renters valued the architectural details and were willing to pay the higher rents required to finance the higher costs, more beautiful structures would be built.
Posted by Sam Quint
Member since Sep 2022
8964 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 10:28 am to
quote:

Nailed it.

The almighty dollar is king. If these corporations can save some money by building a bland box instead of a building with a little character by removing anything not crucial to the function of the building, they will do it every time.

well they obviously did not back then, so what changed?
Posted by Mike da Tigah
Bravo Romeo Lima Alpha
Member since Feb 2005
61840 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 10:35 am to
quote:

This cuts both ways though. If consumers/renters valued the architectural details and were willing to pay the higher rents required to finance the higher costs, more beautiful structures would be built.


And yet the rent still drastically increases regardless, in spite of a lack of redeeming design and shoddy materials and workmanship. Don’t get me started on substrates.

As said previously, the almighty dollar fuels every bit of this, and we’ve all been conditioned to just accept it as progress, but is it really progress for our society or future generations?
Posted by SquatchDawg
Cohutta Wilderness
Member since Sep 2012
20197 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 10:37 am to
We as a society have dropped all standards of appearance, behavior, morality and ethics.

And this isn’t a good thing.
Posted by Sofaking2
Member since Apr 2023
21451 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 10:39 am to

This is actually better than most leave the house these days. This guy at least look presentable, clean and neat. You are correct you are being very generous.
This post was edited on 6/4/26 at 10:41 am
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram