Started By
Message

re: Why has architecture, design, and fashion changed so drastically from say pre WW2 to now?

Posted on 6/4/26 at 4:51 pm to
Posted by StansberryRules
Member since Aug 2024
5520 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 4:51 pm to
Another factor:

Architecture and building used to be a major initiative.

The people who did it were highly skilled and took great pride in their work.

Technology has advanced and made it possible to build things quicker, easier, and cheaper. But that sort of mass production leads inevitable to homogenization.
Posted by UtahCajun
Member since Jul 2021
6825 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 5:09 pm to
quote:

Go on.

I am not a believer of the CT. Have listened to it on podcasts. Rogan has one I believe.

I myself find it too unbelieveable to think that an advanced culture would spring from the steppe peoples culture.
This post was edited on 6/4/26 at 5:11 pm
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
57109 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 7:34 pm to
My theory is that when photography was invented painting had to change. There was no point in realism when photography could do so much better. So Impressionism took stage, then weirder stuff as it became voguish to deconstruct everything. This spilled over into other art forms like archeology.

In short, technology caused philosophers to deconstruct every tradition. This led to experimentation and the avante garde - the need to always be pushing the envelope. Eventually they ended up out of ideas and began sticking crucifixes in urine and building the Obama library.

ETA: If you want to see a wonderful movie that touches on this try Colours of Time. It’s a French movie with subtitles, brilliantly shot and directed.
This post was edited on 6/4/26 at 7:36 pm
Posted by Tall Tiger
Golden Rectangle
Member since Sep 2007
4306 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 11:44 pm to
They had to tear down the old cotton exchange building because it was structurally unsound and in danger of collapse. My ancestors worked in that building.
Posted by WinnPtiger
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2011
25112 posts
Posted on 6/5/26 at 12:36 am to
quote:

My theory is that when photography was invented painting had to change. There was no point in realism when photography could do so much better. So Impressionism took stage, then weirder stuff as it became voguish to deconstruct everything. This spilled over into other art forms like archeology. In short, technology caused philosophers to deconstruct every tradition. This led to experimentation and the avante garde - the need to always be pushing the envelope. Eventually they ended up out of ideas and began sticking crucifixes in urine and building the Obama library. ETA: If you want to see a wonderful movie that touches on this try Colours of Time. It’s a French movie with subtitles, brilliantly shot and directed.



or, and hear me out, you could just read the words of communists. they don’t hide the ball
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
38189 posts
Posted on 6/5/26 at 6:36 am to
But why did newer Catholic Churches in particular become so damned ugly? Almost brutality especially those built from 1960 to 1990? Very boxy and uninspiring.
Posted by kengel2
Team Gun
Member since Mar 2004
33850 posts
Posted on 6/5/26 at 6:52 am to
quote:

well they obviously did not back then, so what changed?


Labor was cheap as shite back then. OSHA wasnt even a thing back then, let alone the massive insurance requirements.
Posted by bluedragon
Birmingham
Member since May 2020
9893 posts
Posted on 6/5/26 at 7:06 am to
The automobile changes are driven primarily due to the elimination of weight in the name of reduction of fuel consumption. Toss in fantasies of reduction of greenhouse gases in the name of carbon reduction.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
57109 posts
Posted on 6/5/26 at 8:31 am to
quote:

or, and hear me out, you could just read the words of communists. they don’t hide the ball

When all of this started there were hardly any communists. Certainly not enough to affect the culture that way. Their efforts to undermine the arts are grafted onto this trend; they didn’t create it.
Posted by TejasHorn
High Plains Driftin'
Member since Mar 2007
11757 posts
Posted on 6/5/26 at 8:39 am to
Brutalist architecture is cheap to build.

Put up a 4 story rectangle with 600 apartments and go cheap on everything possible. Slap some limestone on the corners and call it a day.

Also the rise of the internet and attention stealing devices stunted the progress of everything else. Go back in time to 2006 and it’s not much different than now. Go back from 2006 to 1986 and it was a different world in terms of music, fashion, lifestyle and hobbies, etc.
This post was edited on 6/5/26 at 8:47 am
Posted by Woolfpack
Member since Jun 2021
1869 posts
Posted on 6/5/26 at 8:57 am to
Metal siding with few windows is the cheapest way to build.

We’re lucky to see some brick or stone around the entrance.

Bring back the gargoyles and ward off evil spirits.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
59953 posts
Posted on 6/5/26 at 9:35 am to
quote:

But why did newer Catholic Churches in particular become so damned ugly? Almost brutality especially those built from 1960 to 1990? Very boxy and uninspiring.


The influence on the architecture field. There's also this belief that "new" and/or "unique" always equates to "better". This is why you get crap like the tomb/titty known as St. Jean Vianney.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram