- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Why do we have to "have a dialogue" on race?
Posted on 10/11/16 at 6:56 pm
Posted on 10/11/16 at 6:56 pm
You hear it all the time. We have to talk about race. We have to have an open dialogue about race... why? First off, there's no such thing as an open dialogue on this subject unless you are defending one side and alienating the other. That is the only dialogue that is accepted. Secondly, it seems like we should concentrate on treating everyone the same. Somehow, I don't think that equality is the point.
Posted on 10/11/16 at 6:59 pm to Landmass
quote:
Somehow, I don't think that equality is the point.
It should be the point, but it never turns into that.
The aggrieved party always wants a retaliatory advantage in response to past grievances whether they be perceived or real.
Posted on 10/11/16 at 6:59 pm to Landmass
Dialogue on race simply means "you better listen to me because you are wrong."
Posted on 10/11/16 at 6:59 pm to Landmass
"dialogue" is a code word for "We want everyone to be labeled a racist"
Posted on 10/11/16 at 7:00 pm to Landmass
quote:they want the complete opposite of that
open dialogue about race.
Posted on 10/11/16 at 7:05 pm to Landmass
they know they'll win a dialogue bc they can call you a racist if you don't give in to their demands
This post was edited on 10/11/16 at 7:06 pm
Posted on 10/11/16 at 7:07 pm to Landmass
quote:
Why do we have to "have a dialogue" on race?
Because problems don't often get solved by ignoring them.
quote:
First off, there's no such thing as an open dialogue on this subject unless you are defending one side and alienating the other.
This is true, but it's like that with any sort of political topic from both sides of just about every issue. At least that's how the loudest voices seem to present it.
Posted on 10/11/16 at 7:09 pm to Landmass
You don't have to.
Feel free to ignore whatever you want.
Just don't put up the self-persecution flag when you come back about it.
Feel free to ignore whatever you want.
Just don't put up the self-persecution flag when you come back about it.
Posted on 10/11/16 at 7:10 pm to Peazey
quote:
This is true, but it's like that with any sort of political topic from both sides of just about every issue. At least that's how the loudest voices seem to present it.
I find the race topic is guided almost completely by emotion. Every time it is discussed, it ends with "but you don't know what it's like to be (insert race), so you can't tell me anything".
Posted on 10/11/16 at 7:13 pm to Landmass
A dialogue that moves our country towards true equality is what we need.
However, on one side, you have people who believe the other isn't really equal, and on the other side, you have people who don't want equality, but rather, their turn at the top.
We desperately need someone like MLK in these times.
However, on one side, you have people who believe the other isn't really equal, and on the other side, you have people who don't want equality, but rather, their turn at the top.
We desperately need someone like MLK in these times.
Posted on 10/11/16 at 7:15 pm to Landmass
Rap and crap all you want in the street. Shoot each other. Could care less. Just stay out MY damn yard 
Posted on 10/11/16 at 7:16 pm to Landmass
Their idea of having a "dialogue" is for us to sit there, shut up, and let them yell in our faces about how we are white devils.
This post was edited on 10/11/16 at 7:17 pm
Posted on 10/11/16 at 7:16 pm to LSUFanHouston
What is inequitable in 2016? Racially speaking.
This post was edited on 10/11/16 at 7:18 pm
Posted on 10/11/16 at 7:18 pm to Landmass
If you ever manage to engage in a civil discourse with a BLM supporter, you can ultimately logic dead-end them into the corner where they will admit it's not about equality, it's about getting ahead.
Of course, 99% of the time you'll never even get close to civil discourse.
Of course, 99% of the time you'll never even get close to civil discourse.
Posted on 10/11/16 at 7:19 pm to Landmass
Generally, the people wanting to have a dialogue are completely insulated from poor black people
Posted on 10/11/16 at 7:19 pm to PrivatePublic
quote:
Of course, 99% of the time you'll never even get close to civil discourse.
Don't bring up crime stats. They hate that shite.
Posted on 10/11/16 at 7:20 pm to Landmass
Yes, but the ones who claim that want a dialogue on race don't want the dialog.
Posted on 10/11/16 at 7:23 pm to Landmass
If you have different "groups" they will never treat each other the same until they act the same way.
In other words... You can't expect anything better than what we have now until there is no longer a difference between them.
I'm not talking about equality, I'm talking about how each group acts and the way we think.
In other words... You can't expect anything better than what we have now until there is no longer a difference between them.
I'm not talking about equality, I'm talking about how each group acts and the way we think.
This post was edited on 10/11/16 at 7:26 pm
Popular
Back to top


36









