- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why do we have to "have a dialogue" on race?
Posted on 10/12/16 at 5:55 am to Landmass
Posted on 10/12/16 at 5:55 am to Landmass
quote:
Why do we have to "have a dialogue" on race?
We don't, the dialog and blame needs to happen in the inner cities and on a much larger scale. If your race occupies the majority of the population in a prison system, with the exception that a few are likely wrongfully Incarcerated, then the problem comes from within.
BLM is a prime example of the ignorance and desire to point through finger at anyone, but themselves.
It's a shame you can't just openly say this without being called a racist, but that's what we've come too.
0
Posted on 10/12/16 at 8:00 am to Landmass
This dialog would be something like:
Whites = evil devils
Everyone else = held down by white evil devils
Whites = evil devils
Everyone else = held down by white evil devils
Posted on 10/12/16 at 8:12 am to Landmass
My personal favorite is kids hat went to a private high school with me and others who are at a 4 year university say, "You don't know what it's like to be black in a America"
Posted on 10/12/16 at 8:19 am to Landmass
Since the summer, this word has become overused. Now everyone wants to have a dialogue about everything and I don't think anything constructive has come from these so called... dialogues.
For example, the "dialogue" that was held in Baton Rouge after the police shooting here, the one that was televised. It pretty much turned into the people giving their POV and then being given an answer they want to hear.. then it was back to business as usual.
The Sterling case for example, people in the media and others have become too sensitive to the situation and for whatever reason the results of the case are being protected because, I assume it contains the truth some people don't want to hear.. When you see a list of "black people who have been killed by cops" his name pops up and it makes it seem as if the main reason he was killed was because of his race.
Then there is even more of a division created among "the people" and the police and then when things get "too heated"... Then everyone wants to have a "dialogue". A "sensitive" society has been created and all a dialogue is now, is a BS gathering to tell people what they want to hear.
For example, the "dialogue" that was held in Baton Rouge after the police shooting here, the one that was televised. It pretty much turned into the people giving their POV and then being given an answer they want to hear.. then it was back to business as usual.
The Sterling case for example, people in the media and others have become too sensitive to the situation and for whatever reason the results of the case are being protected because, I assume it contains the truth some people don't want to hear.. When you see a list of "black people who have been killed by cops" his name pops up and it makes it seem as if the main reason he was killed was because of his race.
Then there is even more of a division created among "the people" and the police and then when things get "too heated"... Then everyone wants to have a "dialogue". A "sensitive" society has been created and all a dialogue is now, is a BS gathering to tell people what they want to hear.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News