- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why do we care about JonBenet Ramsey?
Posted on 2/17/19 at 9:23 pm to Deplorable Duke
Posted on 2/17/19 at 9:23 pm to Deplorable Duke
This case is a real mystery rapped inside a riddle. One minute it points toward the parents, next toward an intruder. Had Lou Schmitt lived, he might have solved it. Maybe.
Posted on 2/17/19 at 9:25 pm to Caplewood
Yes the police in Boulder, particularly then , were completely inept. There had been like five murders in a decade in The city of Boulder. These were guys who basically investigated underage drinking. The DA ( Alex Jones initially and that incompetent lady later ) May have been worse.
Posted on 2/17/19 at 9:27 pm to Lsupimp
quote:
Also because Boulder was the perfect boutique town. There was a note. She was cute. The dad had a successful company. They were respected in the community. The weirdness of the beauty pageants. There were many factors that made that story pop.
Plus tons of video of JonBenet in those pageants.
Posted on 2/17/19 at 9:28 pm to tiger81
Yeah, I agree. If parent's did it, they just get rid of body. No way they write that note and mangle their child. Pasty went thru hours of police interrogation and never waivered.
Posted on 2/17/19 at 9:29 pm to Lsupimp
There was always a risk of a neighbor seeing their car driving somewhere inexplicably late at night. You're implying that they lived in a remote area. Their home is in the middle of a suburban neighborhood.
Further, their vehicle would have left tracks in the snow had they driven that night.
Further, their vehicle would have left tracks in the snow had they driven that night.
Posted on 2/17/19 at 9:31 pm to East Coast Band
There is no need to condescend. To answer your question you must realize that the vast majority of people given instructions of one kind or another like this, call the police anyhow. They realize they need law enforcement and the core competencies Of law enforcement. That’s not very compelling to me.
Posted on 2/17/19 at 9:36 pm to Lsupimp
It wasn’t really a garrote though right?
This post was edited on 2/17/19 at 9:37 pm
Posted on 2/17/19 at 9:45 pm to East Coast Band
I agree the risk of a neighbor witnessing a car leaving was possible but highly improbable. That back alley is private as heck and I would think you would have had to be up in the middle of the night and standing at an upstairs window to see it. Plus cars came and went down that alley all day and night.
And let’s be real, it’s in a neighborhood, but it is literally two minutes and one turn up a single road to basically wilderness. And their entrance point is very private in terms of visibility.They had already left tracks in the snow at their home all day and in the alley and baseline road was clear of snow.
And let’s be real, it’s in a neighborhood, but it is literally two minutes and one turn up a single road to basically wilderness. And their entrance point is very private in terms of visibility.They had already left tracks in the snow at their home all day and in the alley and baseline road was clear of snow.
Posted on 2/17/19 at 11:11 pm to Lsupimp
If it was that easy to whisk her away then why didn’t the intruder/murderer do just that?
Why did no one in the house hear her scream?
How did the intruder know his way around the house to hide her in the “wine cellar?”
Why was Patsy wearing the same dress as the night before?
Why did Jombenet have pineapple in her stomach?
This is just off the top of my head, not going into the bizarre, location of the note and timing of the call, the weirdo behavior of the parents the morning of, the staged break in, etc...
And look - each one of those questions might have plausible explanation. But to believe there’s a plausible explanation for all of them stretches the imagination.
Someone in the family did it and both parents covered it up. Period. Every other explanation is a far fetched conspiracy theory.
Why did no one in the house hear her scream?
How did the intruder know his way around the house to hide her in the “wine cellar?”
Why was Patsy wearing the same dress as the night before?
Why did Jombenet have pineapple in her stomach?
This is just off the top of my head, not going into the bizarre, location of the note and timing of the call, the weirdo behavior of the parents the morning of, the staged break in, etc...
And look - each one of those questions might have plausible explanation. But to believe there’s a plausible explanation for all of them stretches the imagination.
Someone in the family did it and both parents covered it up. Period. Every other explanation is a far fetched conspiracy theory.
Posted on 2/17/19 at 11:26 pm to Cold Drink
Oh I see. Everything but your explanation is conspiracy theory . Very logical , lol.
Ask yourself this - WHY would both parents agree to be part of a coverup? ( If Burke did it , they rush her to the hospital and he walks away from it completely anyhow because he’s a little kid and it would be framed as a childhood rough housing tragedy or something). So I would guess you would have to believe BOTH parents were involved in some kind of sexual abuse of the child and that they would intentionally kill their child to cover it up . So what’s your motive ? Why did one of them kill her and why would the other parent cover for the other ?
Ask yourself this - WHY would both parents agree to be part of a coverup? ( If Burke did it , they rush her to the hospital and he walks away from it completely anyhow because he’s a little kid and it would be framed as a childhood rough housing tragedy or something). So I would guess you would have to believe BOTH parents were involved in some kind of sexual abuse of the child and that they would intentionally kill their child to cover it up . So what’s your motive ? Why did one of them kill her and why would the other parent cover for the other ?
Posted on 2/18/19 at 12:01 am to Lsupimp
We know the following FACTS:
* autopsy evidence suggests a history of sexual abuse
* her brother beat her with a gold club
* her brother would smear feces all over her room
* the letter was in Patsy’s handwriting
* patsy was wearing the same dress the following day (wtf?!)
* the note told the family to “rest up” even though they were already sleeping (?)
* neighbors heard screaming but apparently no one in the house woke up from their peaceful slumber while their daughter was beaten and garrotted
* family wouldn’t cooperate with the investigation
* grand jury wanted to charge the family but was torpedoed
* there were no footprints or any evidence of a break in
* the FBI knows of no other case where an intruder breaks in, kills the person, and then remains at the location for maybe an hour to scribble a weird random note. Oh and the note referenced John’s Xmas bonus money.
I could go on and on. I truly don’t understand how you orvanyone else could believe some intruder did it. You don’t have to believe the parents did it beyond a reasonable doubt, but to think that someone other than them did it is delusional IMO
* autopsy evidence suggests a history of sexual abuse
* her brother beat her with a gold club
* her brother would smear feces all over her room
* the letter was in Patsy’s handwriting
* patsy was wearing the same dress the following day (wtf?!)
* the note told the family to “rest up” even though they were already sleeping (?)
* neighbors heard screaming but apparently no one in the house woke up from their peaceful slumber while their daughter was beaten and garrotted
* family wouldn’t cooperate with the investigation
* grand jury wanted to charge the family but was torpedoed
* there were no footprints or any evidence of a break in
* the FBI knows of no other case where an intruder breaks in, kills the person, and then remains at the location for maybe an hour to scribble a weird random note. Oh and the note referenced John’s Xmas bonus money.
I could go on and on. I truly don’t understand how you orvanyone else could believe some intruder did it. You don’t have to believe the parents did it beyond a reasonable doubt, but to think that someone other than them did it is delusional IMO
This post was edited on 2/18/19 at 12:03 am
Posted on 2/18/19 at 12:40 am to Pecker
Because her family was framed and some pathetic punk walked away free.
Posted on 2/18/19 at 12:45 am to Pecker
She was born less than two months after me. A shame I never got the chance to match with her on bumble and bang her.
Posted on 2/18/19 at 1:19 am to Cold Drink
Where are your links in support of each of those facts?
Posted on 2/18/19 at 4:34 am to Lsupimp
quote:
I would guess that the main one was the grotesque nature of child beauty pageants which sexualize 6 year old girls. And because people reacted emotionally to that and formed immediate opinions.
I was more interested that a rich family was able to cover up killing their kid all the while thinking they could direct the police away from them due to power and money.
Posted on 2/18/19 at 5:36 am to LSUintheNW
Well did they ever solve this case or not?
Posted on 2/18/19 at 5:39 am to Lsupimp
quote:
know all the principles involved personally.
The principles?
Posted on 2/18/19 at 5:52 am to tigerinthebueche
quote:
Well did they ever solve this case or not?
Nope. Either the killer died from guilt ridden amped up cancer or just settled with CBS.
Posted on 2/18/19 at 6:05 am to Gris Gris
You don't have to search long to find any of the links. Everything listed is fairly common knowledge.
There is plenty more. Lsupimp is defending the Ramseys solely on the fact he's been near the nice home and area and is going off the assumption that no one living in that nice of a house in that nice of a neighborhood could possibly have committed the kidnapping and murder of Jonbenet.
There is plenty more. Lsupimp is defending the Ramseys solely on the fact he's been near the nice home and area and is going off the assumption that no one living in that nice of a house in that nice of a neighborhood could possibly have committed the kidnapping and murder of Jonbenet.
Popular
Back to top


1








