- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why do hunters and just about anyone who owns a gun think they could repel a invasion..
Posted on 3/1/23 at 7:27 am to carhartt
Posted on 3/1/23 at 7:27 am to carhartt
quote:
It’s called pride in the country and defending our neighbor.
But that’s considered an extremist point of view now.
The backwood tards and sissies of America lost pride in their country a long time ago.
Posted on 3/1/23 at 7:28 am to FilingCabinetBill
The military’s new tranny force is gonna crush all yalls little militias and take yalls guns away. How does it feel to lose to a girl?
Posted on 3/1/23 at 7:28 am to Purple Spoon
quote:
ground invasion of this country and its 300 million privately owned firearms would be a bloodbath.
Yes I was around in 9/11
I ground invasion involves combined arms. And when you have seen the effects of A-10 gun runs combined with apaches and cobras I'm 100% sure your local militia will break and run.
Posted on 3/1/23 at 7:28 am to FilingCabinetBill
quote:
Of continental USA?
What gives people these outlandish ideas? I hunt and I also hear these discussions at my hunting camp.
Most hunters hate other club members and all neighbors for the most part. But somehow they're all going to work together and employ guerilla tactics together?
i don't think a bunch of farmers/hunters are going to stop china from invading, but the idea of an armed populace that can revolt and is armed to the teeth makes the idea of sustaining an invasion much more untenable.
quote:
And assuming anyone invades it will be a full scale combined arm invasion. If we don't own the air then ground troops will be torn to shreds by air to ground and by artillery.
that's more of the question. sure artillery is going to level larger cities, but a ground force is going to have a harder time covering and controlling middle america.
i think that was the point of the original red dawn. they may be able to get a few larger vitories, but there are 400 million guns in america. it's too large of a country with too many people and too much land WITH an armed populace. i'm not saying the Houma shooting club is going to take out the red army but there's enough guns and ammo to deplete an army from controlling sea to shining sea.
just first coffee thoughts.
Posted on 3/1/23 at 7:29 am to FilingCabinetBill
you know we h/ave the best navy and air force in the world - right?
Posted on 3/1/23 at 7:29 am to FilingCabinetBill
The Vietnamese and Afghans did it.
Posted on 3/1/23 at 7:30 am to SlimTigerSlap
quote:
The backwood tards and sissies of America lost pride in their country a long time ago.
I don’t know what “Backwoods Tards”you’ve met, but most country folk love the United States.
I will agree with you on the sissies though. They’re afraid of their own shadow and think guns walk around by themselves and randomly shoot people.
Posted on 3/1/23 at 7:30 am to FilingCabinetBill
quote:
Of continental USA?
What gives people these outlandish ideas? I hunt and I also hear these discussions at my hunting camp.
Most hunters hate other club members and all neighbors for the most part. But somehow they're all going to work together and employ guerilla tactics together?
And assuming anyone invades it will be a full scale combined arm invasion. If we don't own the air then ground troops will be torn to shreds by air to ground and by artillery.
I try to inform all the tards that no overweight army armed with small arms with no organization will be destroyed within days.
Because they have watched Red Dawn one too many times. Even funnier is their insistence that they are the only thing standing between the rest of us and a tyrannical government. I own a house full of guns and have hunted all my life. Enjoy shooting sports like sporting clays and skeet. I can not begin to count the number of people I have met in my 57 years who seriously contend that the government wants to take their guns because they are a threat to the government LOL. When you point out that the government can take them out at any moment and that the last thing they will hear is a low droning buzz and the last words they speak will be something along the line of "what the heck is that thing???" as the drone flies in, blasts them out of existence, and goes on its merry way. Gun folks tend to be nuts...
Posted on 3/1/23 at 7:30 am to FilingCabinetBill
You need to ask Ukraine about that in the early days when 20,000 citizens showed up with guns and with the help of a small artillery unit and a small group of soldiers stopped Russia's march on Kyiv.
Posted on 3/1/23 at 7:31 am to Purple Spoon
quote:
It was the most unified pissed off country in the world for about 6 months. That’s how long it took for the government to divide us again
I thought the halfling messiah would have united everyone, but he was immediately seen as black only; thus, loved by one side, reviled by the other.
Posted on 3/1/23 at 7:32 am to AwgustaDawg
Oh ok. That's one missile on one guy. Now just a few million more. Gonna have to blow up the whole country. And btw the gov guy pushing the button, he has a livelihood, a family and a home address
This post was edited on 3/1/23 at 7:33 am
Posted on 3/1/23 at 7:33 am to carhartt
quote:
I don’t know what “Backwoods Tards”you’ve met, but most country folk love the United States.
Are you sure they love the "united" states or just their neck of the woods?
Posted on 3/1/23 at 7:33 am to FilingCabinetBill
You do realize the reason the South absolutely Dominated the first half of the Civil War was because the Southern solders were hunters, very proficient with weapons, avid horseback riders, and knew the landscape.
Posted on 3/1/23 at 7:34 am to FilingCabinetBill
quote:
an invasion..
FTFY, not as smart as you want us to think you are
Posted on 3/1/23 at 7:35 am to fareplay
quote:
Back of woods folks are dumb that’s why. They never understand that they hunting for stuff that don’t shoot back
Are you trolling by calling people dumb when you can't even use proper grammar?
Posted on 3/1/23 at 7:35 am to FilingCabinetBill
quote:
I ground invasion involves combined arms. And when you have seen the effects of A-10 gun runs combined with apaches and cobras I'm 100% sure your local militia will break and run
This is one of my favorite responses when an armed rebellion discussion comes up. Not only is it not realistic or effective, but do you realize the propaganda effects that would come from a military indiscriminately bombing populated areas?
Posted on 3/1/23 at 7:35 am to Dragula
quote:
You do realize the reason the South absolutely Dominated the first half of the Civil War was because the Southern solders were hunters, very proficient with weapons, avid horseback riders, and knew the landscape.
Lies! It's because they were fighting a defensive battle on their territory.
Posted on 3/1/23 at 7:35 am to FilingCabinetBill
quote:
FilingCabinetBill
You are a newbie, so I guess you going to plant you flag here as a total tard

You probably should start with first finding a military on this planet that could sniff invading the USA.
Once you find that military, then figure out and tell us how that military is going to defeat the largest and strongest military in the history of the world.
Now if that miracle happened and they have some forces remaining, next explain how they will seize a continental landmass, that still has 300 million people and 400 million guns.
Do you even understand the concept of logistics or are you just a trolling idiot.

Popular
Back to top
