Started By
Message

re: Why are “Scientists” ruining dinosaurs?

Posted on 11/20/25 at 11:01 pm to
Posted by Sasquatch Smash
Member since Nov 2007
25840 posts
Posted on 11/20/25 at 11:01 pm to
quote:

What they portray is closer to a Utahraptor. The name just isn’t as cool as velociraptor


It’s not even that. Utahraptor wasn’t officially named in science until the same month the movie came out, which was well after the book was written.

If anything, the “Velociraptors” in the Park films are scaled up Deinonychus. I’m pretty sure one of the paleontologists used as a consultant for the novel (Horne?) had tried lumping the Deinonychus genus under Velociraptor in the 80s, and Crichton thought the word sounded cooler (subjective) and, in my opinion, is easier to say.

Posted by Sasquatch Smash
Member since Nov 2007
25840 posts
Posted on 11/20/25 at 11:05 pm to
quote:

What does the word "raptor" mean?


Something like “pillager” or “thief.”
Posted by Hester Carries
Member since Sep 2012
24943 posts
Posted on 11/20/25 at 11:23 pm to
quote:

Michael Chricton probably should’ve Googled that.


He was a scientist by education and a meticulous researcher. Just didn’t let it get in the way of a good story
Posted by northshorebamaman
Cochise County AZ
Member since Jul 2009
37365 posts
Posted on 11/20/25 at 11:31 pm to
quote:

So, I can believe a 30 pound anything has great capability potential
A honey badger is between 11 to 35 pounds according to Google.
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
71112 posts
Posted on 11/20/25 at 11:35 pm to
Wait until you find out that the folks who made Twister used a camel's growl/moan as the tornado sound.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram