- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why are “Scientists” ruining dinosaurs?
Posted on 11/20/25 at 11:01 pm to white perch
Posted on 11/20/25 at 11:01 pm to white perch
quote:
What they portray is closer to a Utahraptor. The name just isn’t as cool as velociraptor
It’s not even that. Utahraptor wasn’t officially named in science until the same month the movie came out, which was well after the book was written.
If anything, the “Velociraptors” in the Park films are scaled up Deinonychus. I’m pretty sure one of the paleontologists used as a consultant for the novel (Horne?) had tried lumping the Deinonychus genus under Velociraptor in the 80s, and Crichton thought the word sounded cooler (subjective) and, in my opinion, is easier to say.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 11:05 pm to forkedintheroad
quote:
What does the word "raptor" mean?
Something like “pillager” or “thief.”
Posted on 11/20/25 at 11:23 pm to Celery
quote:
Michael Chricton probably should’ve Googled that.
He was a scientist by education and a meticulous researcher. Just didn’t let it get in the way of a good story
Posted on 11/20/25 at 11:31 pm to East Coast Band
quote:A honey badger is between 11 to 35 pounds according to Google.
So, I can believe a 30 pound anything has great capability potential
Posted on 11/20/25 at 11:35 pm to StickyFingers
Wait until you find out that the folks who made Twister used a camel's growl/moan as the tornado sound.
Popular
Back to top


0






