Who’s dumber: “lose” or “loose” people or $ after the amount people

Ozempic has made everybody thin so Mingo has to find someone else to vent his wrath on.

Also those who put the apostrophe at the end when abbreviating a year, such as the championship team of 19'

There’s a practically endless supply of similar errors on TD every day. You surely don’t have to limit it to these two.

quote:

---

There’s a practically endless supply of similar errors on TD every day. You surely don’t have to limit it to these two.

---

These two are particularly retarded. I can see how a there/their happens, but “lose” and “loose” are completely different words

Can someone give me an example of "$ after the amount of people"? While it seems obvious what these words mean, that would make no sense to me and I don't recall ever seeing it, so I feel like I'm missing something

ETA: Ignore the above. Just realized I added the "of". So we're talking 100$ people. Meh, I don't like it, but whatever. Some currencies do it that way, so it's just convention

I'll add brakes vs breaks, absolutely grinds my gears.

Putting something up for “sell” easily beats both of those.

I'm about to loose my mind, I can't believe that _____ was 400$!

quote:

---

but “lose” and “loose” are completely different words

---

dominate vs dominant is the one that I never understand

quote:

---

Can someone give me an example of "$ after the amount of people"?

---

5$ as opposed to $5 is what I am taking it as. It makes sense and honestly doesn't bother me in certain situations, especially if you deal with foreign entities and currencies often. Most of Europe and Asia do this and it can quickly become the norm if you live in that world.