- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: warrant issued for St louis gun couple. weapons seized
Posted on 7/10/20 at 10:06 pm to Clockwatcher68
Posted on 7/10/20 at 10:06 pm to Clockwatcher68
quote:
Third Leg thinks you’re talking about a twitter war.
Well if they stand by their principle (which we know they don't) they won't have any guns so a Twitter war is their only option.
0
Posted on 7/10/20 at 10:10 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
This is what tyranny looks like.
Posted on 7/10/20 at 10:12 pm to johnnydrama
quote:
I am pretty confident I would not have that problem in Jefferson Parish.
I am pretty confident it would be a similar result in your neighboring Orleans Parish.
Posted on 7/10/20 at 10:12 pm to PrimeTime Money
A few more stunts like this from rabid batshit leftist DAs and things are going to make a scary turn in this country.
Posted on 7/10/20 at 10:13 pm to BRgetthenet
Posted on 7/10/20 at 10:15 pm to The Third Leg
quote:
Of course you weird fricks care about this nonsense. Lol. This board is a litmus test for modern idiocy.
frick off
Posted on 7/10/20 at 10:16 pm to Ross
quote:
think this nation is doomed to enter a civil war
Please please please. I am sooo ready. Gonna be some hurt feelings and shocked faces when that day comes.
Posted on 7/10/20 at 10:16 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Here’s who is responsible for this. Her name is Kim Gardner:
She’s a far-lefty who has been embroiled in controversy.
She’s a far-lefty who has been embroiled in controversy.
This post was edited on 7/10/20 at 10:17 pm
Posted on 7/10/20 at 10:16 pm to Pettifogger
Lots of retards on this board still think the modern Democrats are “moderate” in approach
Posted on 7/10/20 at 10:16 pm to BRgetthenet
quote:
You stupid fricking piece of shite....
Third leg is a raving SJW commie. He was probably one of the protesters.
This post was edited on 7/10/20 at 10:21 pm
Posted on 7/10/20 at 10:16 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
When majority of your city is culcha everything is off the table.
Posted on 7/10/20 at 10:17 pm to Ross
quote:
The woke crowd thinks the mob will spare them, but once their usefulness is outlived they will definitely be on the chopping block
I would venture that once you pull guns on Republicans they won’t like you much either.
Posted on 7/10/20 at 10:17 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
This is scary. It's become obvious these rogue DA's are a big problem. I would be doing everything i could to get the hell out of these cities that have them if i lived in one.
Posted on 7/10/20 at 10:17 pm to reedus23
quote:
Having said that, I don't know that the dude deserves to be charged with anything.
Uh, ya think? There is an all out smear campaign of irrelevant information against this couple and it is freaking disgusting.
All that matters is a couple defending their property against an angry mob is having their weapons taken away for that act. That is tyranny and the kind of shite that will lead to insurrection. The pro 2A crowd is not a hornets nest people want to have get stirred up.
Posted on 7/10/20 at 10:17 pm to V Bainbridge
Leave them to rot
Posted on 7/10/20 at 10:18 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
“Hate crime” inbound.
Posted on 7/10/20 at 10:20 pm to Pettifogger
Idaho sounds awfully nice right now
Posted on 7/10/20 at 10:23 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
Under Missouri law, the elements of a malicious prosecution claim are (1) commencement of an earlier suit against the plaintiff; (2) instigation of that suit by the defendant; (3) termination of the suit in the plaintiff’s favor; (4) lack of probable cause for filing the suit; (5) malice by the defendant in initiating the suit; and (6) damage sustained by the plaintiff as a result of the suit. Copeland v. Wicks, --- S.W.3d ---, 2015 WL 4463776, at *2 (Mo. July 21, 2015) (en banc)
He’s going to take this bitch DA to the woodshed.
Posted on 7/10/20 at 10:23 pm to The Third Leg
quote:
Of course you weird fricks care about this nonsense. Lol. This board is a litmus test for modern idiocy.
Any patriot should be worried and outraged over blatant government overreach of their 2nd amendment rights..
Posted on 7/10/20 at 10:25 pm to johnnydrama
quote:
confident I would not have that problem in Jefferson Parish.
You’re probably right. I’m CERTAIN I wouldn’t have that issue in Livingston Parish.
Page 3 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News