1
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Video simulation of WTC tower collapse removes the smoke and debris
Posted on 9/11/26 at 9:51 pm to Towelie
Posted on 9/11/26 at 9:51 pm to Towelie
quote:
Steel Beams can't melt Jet Fuel
No one ever said they did. The trusses sagged from damage and cause the outer tube to buckle. People need to learn how the building was actually structured.
Posted on 9/11/26 at 10:04 pm to DownshiftAndFloorIt
[quote]Most people saying that wouldnt be able to design a kids swing set that was safe to use[/quote
I’m a structural engineer and have been since 1984. There is no way a building can collapse in its footprint without a controlled demolition that Ive performed many of times.
A building of that magnitude would not just gracefully fall in its footprint from 1300 feet high.
I’m a structural engineer and have been since 1984. There is no way a building can collapse in its footprint without a controlled demolition that Ive performed many of times.
A building of that magnitude would not just gracefully fall in its footprint from 1300 feet high.
This post was edited on 9/11/26 at 10:07 pm
Posted on 9/11/26 at 10:07 pm to RobbBobb
If I remember correctly, WTC 7 was also completely engulfed in flames for a really long time.
Posted on 9/11/26 at 10:13 pm to saintsfan1977
quote:Accept deez nuts yo
We were lied to. Accept it.
Posted on 9/11/26 at 10:43 pm to backbone
quote:
A building of that magnitude would not just gracefully fall in its footprint from 1300 feet high.
Good thing that’s not what happened then
Posted on 9/11/26 at 10:53 pm to backbone
quote:
I’m a structural engineer and have been since 1984[/[quote]
[quote]Member since 7/16/2026
Reeks of “Im 18 and an edgy boi”
Posted on 9/12/26 at 8:50 am to GoldenGuy
It was a synchronized controlled demolition is the correct term. Buildings don’t fall perfectly in place.
“Pull it” is the term that was used by the Jew before the demolition of tower 7, that’s a technical term used in explosives. Yall are dumb.
“Pull it” is the term that was used by the Jew before the demolition of tower 7, that’s a technical term used in explosives. Yall are dumb.
Posted on 9/12/26 at 9:03 am to backbone
quote:
I’m a structural engineer and have been since 1984
Either this is a blatant lie or you havent seen or read a single thing about the collapse of either tower.
Posted on 9/12/26 at 9:06 am to DownshiftAndFloorIt
quote:
Either this is a blatant lie or you havent seen or read a single thing about the collapse of either tower.
It’s a lie. Like 2 days ago he said he was 44.
Posted on 9/12/26 at 9:08 am to DownshiftAndFloorIt
I’ve done major research as controlled demolition is how I make a living.
Nothing is what it seems and it’s impossible for the events to happen as described.
What you’re witnessing would have years of planning with explosives for a demolition that successful
Nothing is what it seems and it’s impossible for the events to happen as described.
What you’re witnessing would have years of planning with explosives for a demolition that successful
Posted on 9/12/26 at 9:10 am to backbone
quote:
it’s impossible for the events to happen as described.
Im an engineer (in real life) and what has been described in the official report is exactly what happened.
Posted on 9/12/26 at 9:12 am to backbone
quote:
it’s impossible for the events to happen as described.
The events as you described didn’t happen, so sit down.
Posted on 9/12/26 at 9:13 am to DownshiftAndFloorIt
You and you ilk is what’s wrong with the world today.
Let me guess, you think we’re in Iran because of a nuclear threat? Idiot believes everything he reads.
Let me guess, you think we’re in Iran because of a nuclear threat? Idiot believes everything he reads.
Posted on 9/12/26 at 10:05 am to backbone
quote:
Idiot believes everything he reads
And you go along with whatever Internet theory you read by who the frick knows. Just because “muh government”
Posted on 9/12/26 at 10:57 am to Deadmanshand
quote:
quote:Steel Beams can't melt Jet Fuel
No one ever said they did. The trusses sagged from damage and cause the outer tube to buckle. People need to learn how the building was actually structured.
You should reread that but slower
Posted on 9/12/26 at 3:45 pm to upgrade
Not everything has to be a conspiracy theory. It’s possible that so much chaos and damage was going on, that there might not ever be a clear explanation of how the towers went down. None of the internet people who are “engineers” have no fricking clue what was going on in this buildings or what it felt like. It’s just a race to be the “smartest” person who can try to explain the unexplainable.
Posted on 9/12/26 at 6:58 pm to SOBmustpay
Conspiracy theories are fun for the ignorant
Posted on 9/12/26 at 8:14 pm to OweO
quote:
But were any of the buildings near it damaged beyond repair?
Several.
The three smaller buildings directly adjacent were all crushed. Famously WTC7 across the street collapsed as well.
Several buildings in the WFC, the Deutche Bank bldg, and others were closed for many months due to structural damage.
Posted on 9/12/26 at 8:41 pm to Indefatigable
WTC7 is possibly the only big arse steel building to ever collapse due to fire damage.
Posted on 9/12/26 at 8:55 pm to stout
Stout brah you show up all the time in my X feed, apparently you see the same shite I do
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News