
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Video simulation of WTC tower collapse removes the smoke and debris
Posted on 9/12/26 at 9:36 pm to DownshiftAndFloorIt
Posted on 9/12/26 at 9:36 pm to DownshiftAndFloorIt
quote:
WTC7 is possibly the only big arse steel building to ever collapse due to fire damage.
It also had massive structural damage from WTC1’s collapse.
Posted on 9/12/26 at 9:40 pm to stout
That’s weird.
It’s almost like it was demolished
It’s almost like it was demolished
Posted on 9/12/26 at 9:41 pm to backbone
quote:
A building of that magnitude would not just gracefully fall in its footprint from 1300 feet high.
They didn’t fall in their footprints
Posted on 9/12/26 at 9:43 pm to Indefatigable
In engineering terms falling within 200’ is within footprint
Posted on 9/12/26 at 9:46 pm to backbone
quote:
In engineering terms falling within 200’ is within footprint
Ok well then that’s definitely not what happened. The towers did not collapse in the own footprint then.
Posted on 9/12/26 at 9:48 pm to backbone
If you really are a structural engineer, you’re a retarded structural engineer.
Posted on 9/12/26 at 9:49 pm to Indefatigable
Correct, although the fire is what got it
quote:On September 11, 2001, the structure was substantially damaged by debris when the nearby North Tower (1 World Trade Center) collapsed. The debris ignited fires on multiple lower floors of the building, which continued to burn uncontrolled throughout the afternoon. The building's internal fire suppression system lacked water pressure to fight the fires. 7 WTC began to collapse when a critical internal column buckled and triggered cascading failure of nearby columns throughout. This initiated the progressive collapse of the entire building just after 5:20 pm, according to FEMA and NIST.[1][2] The collapse made 7 WTC the first steel skyscraper known to have collapsed primarily due to uncontrolled fires.[3][4] A new building on the site opened in 2006.
On September 11, 2001, the structure was substantially damaged by debris when the nearby North Tower (1 World Trade Center) collapsed. The debris ignited fires on multiple lower floors of the building, which continued to burn uncontrolled throughout the afternoon. The building's internal fire suppression system lacked water pressure to fight the fires. 7 WTC began to collapse when a critical internal column buckled and triggered cascading failure of nearby columns throughout. This initiated the progressive collapse of the entire building just after 5:20 pm, according to FEMA and NIST.[1][2] The collapse made 7 WTC the first steel skyscraper known to have collapsed primarily due to uncontrolled fires.[3][4] A new building on the site opened in 2006.
Posted on 9/12/26 at 9:52 pm to thermal9221
That type of demolition with that kind of accuracy would be a lifetime achievement for a buildings of that size for any engineer much less some Jews in a plane
Posted on 9/12/26 at 9:56 pm to Indefatigable
As a famous demolition expert that has worked on multiple projects in China that have rivaled those demos, I could not agree less.
Posted on 9/12/26 at 10:16 pm to danilo
quote:
Controlled demolition. Confirmed.
*retard alert*
Posted on 9/12/26 at 10:40 pm to backbone
quote:
As a famous demolition expert that has worked on multiple projects in China that have rivaled those demos, I could not agree less.
But the metric you gave confirmed that they didn’t fall in their own footprint.
I know you’re a bot or a troll/alter but still.
Posted on 9/12/26 at 10:45 pm to Indefatigable
That’s not true a footprint is defined as a ratio of height and diameter and it clearly falls within that diameter
Posted on 9/12/26 at 11:34 pm to backbone
quote:
That’s not true a footprint is defined as a ratio of height and diameter and it clearly falls within that diameter
Put numbers to that. Should be easy for you.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 12:00 am to Indefatigable
Let’s keep arguing about structural engineering instead of going blow up everyone that fundamentally hates us. Because we exist. Ya’ll lost sight of the ball. When the frick did America ever attack anyone because they exist?
Posted on 9/13/26 at 12:01 am to BamaCoaster
quote:
BamaCoaster
There are some stupid mfr’s in this thread, but I believe you are the champion of them all.
Congratulations
Posted on 9/13/26 at 2:58 am to danilo
quote:
Controlled demolition. Confirmed.
Stupidity confirmed
Posted on 9/13/26 at 3:05 am to backbone
You're a fricking idiot. There is a reason you need help putting your shoes on in the morning. We truly have stupid people in this world.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 10:58 am to backbone
Oh you trolling.
Good job.
Good job.

Popular
Back to top


1







