Started By
Message

re: Video simulation of WTC tower collapse removes the smoke and debris

Posted on 9/12/26 at 9:36 pm to
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
38594 posts
Posted on 9/12/26 at 9:36 pm to
quote:

WTC7 is possibly the only big arse steel building to ever collapse due to fire damage.

It also had massive structural damage from WTC1’s collapse.
Posted by Fat and Happy
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2013
20293 posts
Posted on 9/12/26 at 9:40 pm to
That’s weird.

It’s almost like it was demolished
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
38594 posts
Posted on 9/12/26 at 9:41 pm to
quote:

A building of that magnitude would not just gracefully fall in its footprint from 1300 feet high.

They didn’t fall in their footprints
Posted by backbone
Colorado
Member since Jul 2026
368 posts
Posted on 9/12/26 at 9:43 pm to
In engineering terms falling within 200’ is within footprint
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
38594 posts
Posted on 9/12/26 at 9:46 pm to
quote:

In engineering terms falling within 200’ is within footprint

Ok well then that’s definitely not what happened. The towers did not collapse in the own footprint then.
Posted by thermal9221
Youngsville
Member since Feb 2005
15442 posts
Posted on 9/12/26 at 9:48 pm to
If you really are a structural engineer, you’re a retarded structural engineer.
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
73054 posts
Posted on 9/12/26 at 9:49 pm to
Correct, although the fire is what got it

quote:

On September 11, 2001, the structure was substantially damaged by debris when the nearby North Tower (1 World Trade Center) collapsed. The debris ignited fires on multiple lower floors of the building, which continued to burn uncontrolled throughout the afternoon. The building's internal fire suppression system lacked water pressure to fight the fires. 7 WTC began to collapse when a critical internal column buckled and triggered cascading failure of nearby columns throughout. This initiated the progressive collapse of the entire building just after 5:20 pm, according to FEMA and NIST.[1][2] The collapse made 7 WTC the first steel skyscraper known to have collapsed primarily due to uncontrolled fires.[3][4] A new building on the site opened in 2006.
On September 11, 2001, the structure was substantially damaged by debris when the nearby North Tower (1 World Trade Center) collapsed. The debris ignited fires on multiple lower floors of the building, which continued to burn uncontrolled throughout the afternoon. The building's internal fire suppression system lacked water pressure to fight the fires. 7 WTC began to collapse when a critical internal column buckled and triggered cascading failure of nearby columns throughout. This initiated the progressive collapse of the entire building just after 5:20 pm, according to FEMA and NIST.[1][2] The collapse made 7 WTC the first steel skyscraper known to have collapsed primarily due to uncontrolled fires.[3][4] A new building on the site opened in 2006.
Posted by backbone
Colorado
Member since Jul 2026
368 posts
Posted on 9/12/26 at 9:52 pm to
That type of demolition with that kind of accuracy would be a lifetime achievement for a buildings of that size for any engineer much less some Jews in a plane
Posted by backbone
Colorado
Member since Jul 2026
368 posts
Posted on 9/12/26 at 9:56 pm to
As a famous demolition expert that has worked on multiple projects in China that have rivaled those demos, I could not agree less.
Posted by Roberteaux
mandeville
Member since Sep 2009
6276 posts
Posted on 9/12/26 at 10:16 pm to
quote:

Controlled demolition. Confirmed.


*retard alert*
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
38594 posts
Posted on 9/12/26 at 10:40 pm to
quote:

As a famous demolition expert that has worked on multiple projects in China that have rivaled those demos, I could not agree less.

But the metric you gave confirmed that they didn’t fall in their own footprint.

I know you’re a bot or a troll/alter but still.
Posted by backbone
Colorado
Member since Jul 2026
368 posts
Posted on 9/12/26 at 10:45 pm to
That’s not true a footprint is defined as a ratio of height and diameter and it clearly falls within that diameter
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
38594 posts
Posted on 9/12/26 at 11:34 pm to
quote:

That’s not true a footprint is defined as a ratio of height and diameter and it clearly falls within that diameter

Put numbers to that. Should be easy for you.
Posted by ScottAndrew
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Aug 2009
1475 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 12:00 am to
Let’s keep arguing about structural engineering instead of going blow up everyone that fundamentally hates us. Because we exist. Ya’ll lost sight of the ball. When the frick did America ever attack anyone because they exist?
Posted by Rekrul
Member since Feb 2007
9749 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 12:01 am to
quote:

BamaCoaster


There are some stupid mfr’s in this thread, but I believe you are the champion of them all.

Congratulations
Posted by supatigah
CEO of the Keith Hernandez Fan Club
Member since Mar 2004
90398 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 1:14 am to


Posted by TigerBait2008
Boulder,CO
Member since Jun 2008
40882 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 2:58 am to
quote:

Controlled demolition. Confirmed.




Stupidity confirmed
Posted by TigerBait2008
Boulder,CO
Member since Jun 2008
40882 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 3:05 am to
You're a fricking idiot. There is a reason you need help putting your shoes on in the morning. We truly have stupid people in this world.
Posted by BabyTac
Austin, TX
Member since Jun 2008
17321 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 7:25 am to
Believe in the science!!!!
Posted by thermal9221
Youngsville
Member since Feb 2005
15442 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 10:58 am to
Oh you trolling.

Good job.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram