- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

UW-Madison to remove 70-ton boulder some view as reminder of campus' racist past
Posted on 8/6/21 at 1:26 pm
Posted on 8/6/21 at 1:26 pm
quote:
UW-Madison will remove a 70-ton boulder from the heart of campus Friday morning following calls over the past year from students of color who view the rock as a symbol of the university’s racist past.
Chamberlin Rock, located on top of Observatory Hill, is named in honor of Thomas Crowder Chamberlin, a geologist and former university president. But for some students of color on campus, the rock represents a painful history of discrimination.
The boulder was referred to as a “n——-head” — a commonly used expression in the 1920s to describe any large dark rock — at least once in a 1925 Wisconsin State Journal story.
quote:
The university estimated this winter that removal would cost between $30,000 and $75,000 — an amount that officials said at the time would be covered with private or gift funds. McGlone said a more recent cost estimate will be available Friday.
The Black Student Union led the call to remove the rock last summer. Nalah McWhorter, the group’s president and a UW-Madison senior, said in an interview this summer that the demands to remove the boulder had been around even before she arrived on campus three years ago.
“I’m grateful that we have had the opportunity to do this and that the rock will be removed,” she said. “It was our demand, and it was something that we put all the work in for.”
LINK
This post was edited on 8/6/21 at 1:35 pm
Posted on 8/6/21 at 1:27 pm to Tigerbait357
Mean old racist rock!
Posted on 8/6/21 at 1:28 pm to Tigerbait357
quote:
The boulder was referred to as a “n——-head” — a commonly used expression in the 1920s to describe any large dark rock — at least once in a 1925 Wisconsin State Journal story. University historians have not found any other time that the term was used but said the Ku Klux Klan was active on campus at that time.
Wait what
Posted on 8/6/21 at 1:28 pm to Tigerbait357
About damn time, that Boulder assaulted my uncle and was never held accountable
Posted on 8/6/21 at 1:28 pm to Tigerbait357
I can't stand either person in that photo.
This post was edited on 8/6/21 at 1:29 pm
Posted on 8/6/21 at 1:30 pm to Ed Osteen
quote:
The boulder was referred to as a “n——-head” — a commonly used expression in the 1920s to describe any large dark rock — at least once in a 1925 Wisconsin State Journal story.
Growing up in Wisconsin, I never heard this term and I have some pretty racist family members
Posted on 8/6/21 at 1:31 pm to Tigerbait357
quote:
But for some students of color on campus, the rock represents a painful history of discrimination.
Any reason given for why they feel this way?
Posted on 8/6/21 at 1:31 pm to Tigerbait357
Damn, there are rocks in my yard. Could have been me.
Posted on 8/6/21 at 1:31 pm to TDTOM
quote:All rocks are potential statues.
So now rocks are racist?
Posted on 8/6/21 at 1:31 pm to TDTOM
quote:Welcome to progressivism.
So now rocks are racist?
Everything is racist.
Posted on 8/6/21 at 1:32 pm to Tigerbait357
Libturd demands for waycism exceed supply.
Eta, I see a "noose", lol!
Eta, I see a "noose", lol!
This post was edited on 8/6/21 at 1:36 pm
Posted on 8/6/21 at 1:34 pm to Tigerbait357
quote:
The boulder was referred to as a “n——-head” — a commonly used expression in the 1920s to describe any large dark rock — at least once in a 1925 Wisconsin State Journal story.
Why did you leave this part out of the OP? Seems like the reason they think its racist is an important part of the story.
Regardless I think its pretty stupid to remove a rock based on this reason, it was a commonly used phrase to describe large dark rocks back then, what are you gonna do remove every large dark rock in america?
This post was edited on 8/6/21 at 1:36 pm
Posted on 8/6/21 at 1:36 pm to Tigerbait357
quote:
Black Student Union
racist
Posted on 8/6/21 at 1:36 pm to Tigerbait357
Doing God's work, one rock at a timie.
Posted on 8/6/21 at 1:36 pm to CrimsonFever
quote:
Why did you leave this part out of the OP? Seems like the reason they think its racist is an important part of the story.
Story also noted that historians could find no other records of the terms usage.
So it was called something in one article 94 years ago and now must be moved. That’s where we are at
Posted on 8/6/21 at 1:43 pm to Bruco
Racism existed at some point in the past at UW, therefore the entire UW must be removed.
Im sure at some point a racist has walked through each of the academic halls of that university and therefore the university should be leveled.
Nice knowing ya Badgers.
Im sure at some point a racist has walked through each of the academic halls of that university and therefore the university should be leveled.
Nice knowing ya Badgers.
Posted on 8/6/21 at 1:45 pm to Tigerbait357
God, SJWs even hate nature.
By this logic, anything ever called ****** should be removed from the US, right?
RIGHT!?
By this logic, anything ever called ****** should be removed from the US, right?
RIGHT!?
Posted on 8/6/21 at 1:47 pm to Bruco
quote:
So it was called something in one article 94 years ago and now must be moved. That’s where we are at
In a similar vein, someone made an off-color postcard about gator bait a hundred years ago, and as a result, the Florida Gators have banned using the phrase “Gator bait” at rival teams during football games because it has racial overtones.
Popular
Back to top

66











