Started By
Message

re: UPDATE 4/26 -Just In Case the OT Didn't Know - The UK is murdering a little baby right now

Posted on 4/25/18 at 11:19 am to
Posted by DirtyMikeandtheBoys
Member since May 2011
19467 posts
Posted on 4/25/18 at 11:19 am to
quote:

It's much different if the patient is a vegetable.

There comes a point in these cases where it's less about the care of the sick person and more about the family not wanting to let go.

I think that should be left up to the family and the doctors, not the government. Government shouldn't force doctors to treat and shouldn't tell families they can't seek other treatment.


very well put
Posted by Ross
Member since Oct 2007
47827 posts
Posted on 4/25/18 at 11:19 am to
quote:

I think that the govt is making a tough decision but one that they came to very carefully and not without very careful consideration of the well being of the child. It's just an unfortunate situation



it should not be the government's decision to make
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89137 posts
Posted on 4/25/18 at 11:19 am to
quote:

That's ridiculous and not what I said.


You said it's prolonging the inevitable. Inevitably, all humans die. Choose your words better when you want to be the contrarian.
quote:

You're arguing my point with my point.


That wasn't an argument for or against any point you're trying to make.
Posted by theOG
Member since Feb 2010
10834 posts
Posted on 4/25/18 at 11:20 am to
quote:


There's no one to condemn


Except for the individuals preventing the person dying from receiving further treatment.

The judge is making this decision in the "best interest of Alfie." The issue here is that the judge is making this decision and not Alfie's parents.

This is EXACTLY what can happen when the government is in charge of health care.
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
172004 posts
Posted on 4/25/18 at 11:22 am to
quote:

You said it's prolonging the inevitable. Inevitably, all humans die. Choose your words better when you want to be the contrarian.


I'm talking about a child with almost complete brain degredation with no known cure or plan of action. It's absurd to liken that to the fact that everyone dies one day.
Posted by Pilot Tiger
North Carolina
Member since Nov 2005
74021 posts
Posted on 4/25/18 at 11:22 am to
I feel like we're having a decent back and forth in this thread and then once we reach a climax and some common ground, more people come out of the woodwork and parrot the same points that have already been discussed
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
37536 posts
Posted on 4/25/18 at 11:22 am to
quote:

It just prolongs the inevitable


We can prolong death of cancer for a year or more that eventually will be terminal. What's the threshold on how long treatment has to keep the patient alive? Is it cost or length that determines the threshold?

Again, we can argue the ethics of what the family should do, bit the government shouldn't be making the decision.
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
53509 posts
Posted on 4/25/18 at 11:23 am to
quote:

The judge is making this decision in the "best interest of Alfie." The issue here is that the judge is making this decision and not Alfie's parents.


The judge isn't making the decision willy-nilly, the judge is making the decision in consultation with multiple experts.

Are the parents doing more harm than good to Alfie by pursuing further treatment that has been deemed futile by doctors in both the UK and Italy? Is it inhumane?
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89137 posts
Posted on 4/25/18 at 11:23 am to
quote:

I'm talking about a child with almost complete brain degredation with no known cure or plan of action. It's absurd to liken that to the fact that everyone dies one day.




It's absurd that we even have to discuss this. If the parents can pay, they should be able to seek whatever treatment, regardless of its probability success. You're post that the Italian docs think it was delaying the inevitable is irrelevant.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
111522 posts
Posted on 4/25/18 at 11:23 am to
quote:

The Parents want to try other avenues and have the means to pay for it.
This actually isnt true

The Italian doctors said they have no other avenues to try and save the child, they are just willing to keep him on life support longer
Posted by crimsonsaint
Member since Nov 2009
37834 posts
Posted on 4/25/18 at 11:23 am to
quote:

And my only request was that I'd like to read the facts and determine that for myself instead of reading the tears in the OP.


Then google it yourself dumbass.
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
53509 posts
Posted on 4/25/18 at 11:24 am to
quote:

If the parents can pay


Are they paying anything?
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
37536 posts
Posted on 4/25/18 at 11:24 am to
quote:

The judge isn't making the decision willy-nilly, the judge is making the decision in consultation with multiple experts.



This is a fundamental political philosophy debate where no one is going to change their mind.

quote:

Are the parents doing more harm than good to Alfie by pursuing further treatment that has been deemed futile by doctors in both the UK and Italy? Is it inhumane?



No
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
53509 posts
Posted on 4/25/18 at 11:25 am to
quote:

quote:
Are the parents doing more harm than good to Alfie by pursuing further treatment that has been deemed futile by doctors in both the UK and Italy? Is it inhumane?


quote:

No



I disagree.

It isn't even treatment that he would be receiving. It is more a form of life-support.
Posted by Ross
Member since Oct 2007
47827 posts
Posted on 4/25/18 at 11:25 am to
quote:

I'm talking about a child with almost complete brain degredation with no known cure or plan of action. It's absurd to liken that to the fact that everyone dies one day.



also no diagnosis unless I'm mistaken

look, I'm not saying there is any likelihood whatsoever that this kid can be saved. But if it was my child, I want the right to take my child to people willing to service him and potentially gain a diagnosis and keep the really faint hope alive for a cure or plan of action.

I think it's unreal to me that 30 armed guards are preventing that from happening. Way too much overreach by governmental authorities into the right of the parent to search for care for the child.

I think you agree with that sentiment. It's where I get really upset about this whole deal.
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
172004 posts
Posted on 4/25/18 at 11:25 am to
quote:


It's absurd that we even have to discuss this. If the parents can pay, they should be able to seek whatever treatment, regardless of its probability success. You're post that the Italian docs think it was delaying the inevitable is irrelevant


Dude read my posts again. I said this several times.

I said it's delaying the inevitable but that decision should be left to the parents and doctors.

And you call me a contrarian when you're literally arguing what I just said.
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
87383 posts
Posted on 4/25/18 at 11:26 am to
quote:

The judge isn't making the decision willy-nilly, the judge is making the decision in consultation with multiple experts.

Are the parents doing more harm than good to Alfie by pursuing further treatment that has been deemed futile by doctors in both the UK and Italy? Is it inhumane?


These are valid questions, and unless the latter can be very clearly and accurately answered in the affirmative, I think the consensus on this board is that the state should not be the one making that decision.

Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
53509 posts
Posted on 4/25/18 at 11:27 am to
quote:

quote:
The judge isn't making the decision willy-nilly, the judge is making the decision in consultation with multiple experts.

Are the parents doing more harm than good to Alfie by pursuing further treatment that has been deemed futile by doctors in both the UK and Italy? Is it inhumane?


quote:

These are valid questions, and unless the latter can be very clearly and accurately answered in the affirmative, I think the consensus on this board is that the state should not be the one making that decision.



The state makes decisions on child-abuse all the time.
Posted by DirtyMikeandtheBoys
Member since May 2011
19467 posts
Posted on 4/25/18 at 11:28 am to
quote:

I disagree.

It isn't even treatment that he would be receiving. It is more a form of life-support.


well, if he is a vegetable, then it really does no harm other than financially to keep him on life support indefinitely, as he cannot feel anything. so the argument for letting him die to ease his "suffering" (how can a vegetative person suffer) is pointless
This post was edited on 4/25/18 at 11:29 am
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89137 posts
Posted on 4/25/18 at 11:29 am to
quote:

The state makes decisions on child-abuse all the time.



Pretty sure killing your child is a form of abuse.
Jump to page
Page First 11 12 13 14 15 ... 33
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 13 of 33Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram