Started By
Message

re: The SS United States had departed Mobile,AL and will sink 11/12/2026

Posted on 11/11/26 at 9:39 pm to
Posted by Btrtigerfan
Disgruntled employee
Member since Dec 2007
24398 posts
Posted on 11/11/26 at 9:39 pm to
Just added the finale to the OP. With sound and all.
Posted by weagle1999
Member since May 2025
4493 posts
Posted on 11/11/26 at 9:41 pm to
If she is on her side only advanced open water divers can access based on what I read.
Posted by ConnectTheDots
Member since May 2026
345 posts
Posted on 11/11/26 at 9:50 pm to
This is what happens when smart people go so far down the rabbit hole trying to engineer the perfect solution that they overcomplicate the entire process. Meanwhile, a couple of baws and a few drums of Tannerite would’ve had her on the bottom hours ago.
Posted by notiger1997
Metairie
Member since May 2009
62296 posts
Posted on 11/11/26 at 10:08 pm to
quote:

would’ve had her on the bottom hours ago.


Hitting the bottom wasn't the goal. Hitting the bottom while still being upright was what they were trying to do.
Posted by ConnectTheDots
Member since May 2026
345 posts
Posted on 11/11/26 at 10:11 pm to
And probably failed anyway. Meanwhile the average viewer just wanted to see her go down in daylight.
Posted by Chicken
Jackassistan
Member since Aug 2003
28308 posts
Posted on 11/11/26 at 10:16 pm to
Did the music make the event sad?
Posted by weagle1999
Member since May 2025
4493 posts
Posted on 11/11/26 at 10:24 pm to
Yes, but my heart will go on.
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
24771 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 4:29 am to
quote:

divers can't really get to much if she's on her side


Her beam is 101 ft. I have no clue what the height was. But being so wide I wouldn’t think there would be a major issue here for divers. Needless to say, I don’t understand why they put it in 220 ft anyway. It’s like they over think these damn things.
Posted by PJinAtl
Atlanta
Member since Nov 2007
15001 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 6:01 am to
quote:

Don’t understand why they wouldn’t have gone shallower. If it settled on its port side, it will be awfully deep and hard for divers to get to without a lot of experience


My understanding is/was that if she settled as planned, her top deck would only by at about 55 feet. Go much shallower and she becomes a potential hazard.
Posted by soccerfüt
Location: A Series of Tubes
Member since May 2013
77283 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 7:02 am to
quote:

My understanding is/was that if she settled as planned, her top deck would only by at about 55 feet. Go much shallower and she becomes a potential hazard.
If they’d had let the MARTA/ Weather Channel folks handle this event like the Georgia Dome demolition, the United States would be sitting bow straight up in the air, stern buried in the sand.

28-3
Posted by nuwaydawg
Member since Nov 2007
2537 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 7:42 am to
quote:

Looks like the back is starting to sink some


What a stupid aft comment.
Posted by Btrtigerfan
Disgruntled employee
Member since Dec 2007
24398 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 7:49 am to
You drop your bait 75 pulls.
Posted by tilco
Spanish Fort, AL
Member since Nov 2013
14761 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 7:49 am to
If it turns out it’s laying on its side that’s a colossal frickup.
Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
79630 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 7:50 am to
I wonder if they’ll have divers out there today to check
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
119039 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 7:51 am to
The last dying breaths of a fantastic vessel.
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
24771 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 8:09 am to
quote:

My understanding is/was that if she settled as planned, her top deck would only by at about 55 feet. Go much shallower and she becomes a potential hazard.


That’s what I was trying to figure out. Online looks like she is about 180 ft tall to the top of her stacks and the stacks are 65 ft tall. Stacks were removed but there’s other structures now, so let’s say she is 130 ft tall? I believe it was 220 ft so it’s about 90 ft down.

Her beam is 110 ft. So she is somewhere between 110 ft and 90 ft down? Doesn’t seem like a major difference to me
Posted by Santiago_Dunbar
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2021
319 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 8:10 am to
They might’ve lucked out:

Posted by Clyde Tipton
Planet Earth
Member since Dec 2007
40987 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 8:23 am to
quote:

I wonder if they’ll have divers out there today to check


I’m sure they’re already on it.

That sonar scan below is crap compared to today’s technology. Somebody get a good ol Baw out there with his livescope.
This post was edited on 11/12/26 at 8:40 am
Posted by tilco
Spanish Fort, AL
Member since Nov 2013
14761 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 8:23 am to
That’s awesome if it’s correct
Posted by Clyde Tipton
Planet Earth
Member since Dec 2007
40987 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 8:26 am to
You can see the depth scale down the right side of the scan. That’s something hard at 55’.

ETA: Each subsequent hard mark going down are the floors.
This post was edited on 11/12/26 at 8:28 am
Jump to page
Page First 9 10 11 12 13
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 11 of 13Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram