Started By
Message

re: The Deadly Rise of Giant Trucks and SUV's

Posted on 6/23/26 at 10:35 am to
Posted by jclem11
Chief Nihilist
Member since Nov 2011
9877 posts
Posted on 6/23/26 at 10:35 am to
quote:

Found the problem. Liberal shill shilling for warped liberal progressive perspective.


Or it is just data and common sense.

Never go full ostrich mode.

Posted by SparkyWilson
Member since May 2026
63 posts
Posted on 6/23/26 at 10:52 am to
Are you advocating for getting rid of trucks and SUVs completely?
Posted by jclem11
Chief Nihilist
Member since Nov 2011
9877 posts
Posted on 6/23/26 at 11:07 am to
quote:

Are you advocating for getting rid of trucks and SUVs completely?


Not a full ban. The height of the hoods and size of them should be strictly regulated and reduced especially for urban environments.

The size of trucks and SUVs is comically large now and we have empirical data showing they are unsafe, especially in urban environments with pedestrians and cyclists are more likely to be encountered.

Frankly, there is no reason to be driving a large F-250 in the urban core when you are an office bro that lives in a suburb mcmansion that maybe hauls stuff a few times a year.

Posted by SparkyWilson
Member since May 2026
63 posts
Posted on 6/23/26 at 11:27 am to
No, F-250s and similar vehicles have no business in urban environments. And, no, I don't "need" my 2014 F-150, but it's been a great vehicle. I don't need it to do truck things until I need it to do truck things and it's far more convenient to not have to pivot to a 3rd party to do those things. I like to think I'm conscientious about driving it. I don't park to block views or back in over sidewalks (I mean when the bed hangs 3' over the sidewalk). I don't leave my ball hitch installed. I watch for crosswalks and pedestrians/cyclists in general (even when they are doing wrong). Like all things, the bad actors are going to ruin the perception for everyone.

I hope you also advocate for better adherence to pedestrian/cycling laws as well.

There also needs to be broad crackdown on distraction while traveling regardless of method of locomotion.
This post was edited on 6/23/26 at 11:29 am
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
19715 posts
Posted on 6/23/26 at 11:29 am to
quote:

The height of the hoods and size of them should be strictly regulated and reduced especially for urban environments.


Such an ignorant, uneducated opinion. Let's just focus purely on simple dimensions and not the fact that today's trucks and SUV's already incorporate front profiles and energy absorbing materials and designs for the sake of safety, both for those inside as well as those impacted. My 2000 F-150 has a relatively small front profile for a truck yet there is nothing but solidly mounted steel at the leg and waist levels, would basically shear an individual at their midpoint. New trucks have front ends that are more blunt and full plastic with bumpers mounted to crumple zones that are much more effective in absorbing and distributing impact forces.
Posted by jclem11
Chief Nihilist
Member since Nov 2011
9877 posts
Posted on 6/23/26 at 11:45 am to
quote:

Clames


quote:

Such an ignorant, uneducated opinion


You are so confidently wrong but we will continue.

quote:

Let's just focus purely on simple dimensions and not the fact that today's trucks and SUV's already incorporate front profiles and energy absorbing materials and designs for the sake of safety, both for those inside as well as those impacted.


We are talking about impacts with a pedestrian ITT. Modern trucks have hoods almost 5 feet tall in some cases. The pedestrian is run over and shoved under the truck and killed immediately.

quote:

New trucks have front ends that are more blunt and full plastic with bumpers mounted to crumple zones that are much more effective in absorbing and distributing impact forces.


None of this shite matters when you hit a pedestrian dude. The truck is too talk and will kill more people. Stop arguing with the data.

You are just wrong on this topic. Take a lap.
Posted by Crowknowsbest
Member since May 2012
26988 posts
Posted on 6/23/26 at 11:48 am to
quote:

You'll get a lot of downvotes, but probably the biggest offenders of highway tailgating are from jacked up trucks

Oversized trucks or Nissan altimas almost exclusively.
Posted by madmaxvol
Infinity + 1 Posts
Member since Oct 2011
22309 posts
Posted on 6/23/26 at 11:50 am to
quote:

By the 2010s, larger vehicles like compact S.U.V.s had eclipsed cars.

Today, S.U.V.s and pickup trucks dominate the roads. Many are bigger than ever.




My son bought a used truck about a month ago. Fortunately, it was before these things got larger like they are today. His little 2001 Ford F-250 Super Duty 4wd Powerstroke Crew Cab has a dry weight of only 7,000 pounds and a Gross Vehicle Weight Rating of just under 9,000. Fortunately, it's also a short bed, so it's only 20 feet long.



I'm so glad he didn't buy one of these bigger trucks they make today like you are talking about.
Posted by jclem11
Chief Nihilist
Member since Nov 2011
9877 posts
Posted on 6/23/26 at 11:51 am to
quote:

And, no, I don't "need" my 2014 F-150, but it's been a great vehicle. I don't need it to do truck things until I need it to do truck things and it's far more convenient to not have to pivot to a 3rd party to do those things. I like to think I'm conscientious about driving it. I don't park to block views or back in over sidewalks (I mean when the bed hangs 3' over the sidewalk). I don't leave my ball hitch installed. I watch for crosswalks and pedestrians/cyclists in general (even when they are doing wrong).


I appreciate that you may not be a bad actor. However when it comes to public policy you have to remember that your average fellow citizen is a fricking retard and you have to craft public policy accordingly.

Most people have no business in these giant trucks and thus public policy needs to address the issue as they are harming the rest of us.

quote:

I hope you also advocate for better adherence to pedestrian/cycling laws as well.


For sure. However most American cities are down right hostile in regards to pedestrians and cyclists and thus people that need to use walking or cycling to get to work or travel are forced to take unnecessary risks and interact with vehicles.

I'll use my own city of Houston as an example. Many parts of town have no or inconsistent sidewalks and the bus service is arse. So many folks end up walking / biking if they cannot afford a vehicle.

Posted by N2cars
Member since Feb 2008
39992 posts
Posted on 6/23/26 at 12:10 pm to
Yes, and it is full of misinformation.

Of course, any larger vehicle is going to cause more damage when it hits anything. That's basic common sense, backed up by physics.

There is absolutely no question that, overall, vehicles are safer now than they were 10 or 20 years ago.
Just compare traffic death statistics for the past 20 years.

As far as large trucks (pickups and SUVs) having more "blind spots", that is just false. You can see every corner of the vehicle, assuming you adjust seats and mirrors correctly

Nothing has more blind spots than a 2-door coupe

Anyone that's driven both will agree.


As a practical matter, you generally dont see as many 1/2 tons in a urban environments, usually because of space and parking constraints.
Even the smaller trucks sit up higher than a sedan and are designed similarly to a full-size truck.
Posted by jclem11
Chief Nihilist
Member since Nov 2011
9877 posts
Posted on 6/23/26 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

As far as large trucks (pickups and SUVs) having more "blind spots", that is just false. You can see every corner of the vehicle, assuming you adjust seats and mirrors correctly


The article you didn't read addresses this lmao.

quote:

To analyze how these blind zones have changed, we used a three-dimensional scanner to compare sightlines in four of the most common pickups today — the Chevrolet Silverado, Ford F-150, GMC Sierra and Toyota Tacoma — with their counterparts from the 1990s or early 2000s.

The Silverado’s blind zones have nearly doubled.

The Sierra’s and the Tacoma’s grew by about 60 percent.

The smallest increase was the F-150’s. Its blind zones grew by about 25 percent.

Our overall findings match what we found in court records and heard from dozens of experts who reconstruct crashes for police and lawyers.


quote:

There is absolutely no question that, overall, vehicles are safer now than they were 10 or 20 years ago.
Just compare traffic death statistics for the past 20 years.


Again, we are talking about pedestrian deaths which have INCREASED.

quote:

For decades, American roads were steadily getting safer for pedestrians. But around 2009, the trend reversed. Since then, the number of pedestrians killed each year has risen by about 75 percent.


Again read the article before raging all over because your truck feels got hurt.
Posted by Tempratt
Member since Oct 2013
15240 posts
Posted on 6/23/26 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

Today, S.U.V.s and pickup trucks dominate the roads. Many are bigger than ever.

And far deadlier, a New York Times investigation found.


New York Times. They're run by a group of people don't want private ownership of ANY automobiles let alone large SUV's.

Can't imagine why anyone would care what NYT says.
Posted by N2cars
Member since Feb 2008
39992 posts
Posted on 6/23/26 at 1:14 pm to
I call into question their conclusions, and how they arrived at them, with their own scanners and "engineers ".

And as far as "reconstruction" experts, I can hire any expert to agree or disagree with whatever conclusion I desire.

Im not sure how sightlines can decrease in a vehicle that has four large windows and a windshield and usually, a unobstructed back glass. You may actually have to adjust seats, mirrors, or pedals.
I will say some SUVs do a have larger C-Pillar, which when combined with a sloping hatch area, can have a significant blind spot, so the driver should be aware of that.

In addition, most modern vehicles have backup cameras as well as BSIs, as standard equipment.


Cite some info from IIHS or other unbiased sources.

No one is taking the NYT seriously, especially as a source for vehicle information.

FWIW, I always check a vehicle's safety rating when recommending cars or trucks for friends or family.
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
41329 posts
Posted on 6/23/26 at 1:18 pm to
They need more giant SUVs at Delaney Hall
Posted by N2cars
Member since Feb 2008
39992 posts
Posted on 6/23/26 at 1:20 pm to
Let me ask you a question:


When was the last time you saw someone walking down the street and they weren't staring at their phone?
Posted by SparkyWilson
Member since May 2026
63 posts
Posted on 6/23/26 at 1:22 pm to
quote:

I appreciate that you may not be a bad actor. However when it comes to public policy you have to remember that your average fellow citizen is a fricking retard and you have to craft public policy accordingly.



That doesn't say much for the average pedestrian or cyclist considering they are part of that same citizenry.

quote:

For sure. However most American cities are down right hostile in regards to pedestrians and cyclists and thus people that need to use walking or cycling to get to work or travel are forced to take unnecessary risks and interact with vehicles.

I'll use my own city of Houston as an example. Many parts of town have no or inconsistent sidewalks and the bus service is arse. So many folks end up walking / biking if they cannot afford a vehicle.


That's a real issue, and I'm on board with cyclists and pedestrians being able to safely get to work. Recreational cycling on roads is a whole other issue.
Posted by jclem11
Chief Nihilist
Member since Nov 2011
9877 posts
Posted on 6/23/26 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

I call into question their conclusions, and how they arrived at them, with their own scanners and "engineers ".


With whataoutism and feels lmao.

quote:

And as far as "reconstruction" experts, I can hire any expert to agree or disagree with whatever conclusion I desire.


This is your best refuation? Hope you don't practice defense law because your client is for sure going to prison.

quote:

Im not sure how sightlines can decrease in a vehicle that has four large windows and a windshield and usually, a unobstructed back glass. You may actually have to adjust seats, mirrors, or pedals.
I will say some SUVs do a have larger C-Pillar, which when combined with a sloping hatch area, can have a significant blind spot, so the driver should be aware of that.


It's almost like the new cars are frickin huge and way taller than the average adult in the US and thus are more deadly to pedestrians....which is the *checks notes* entire fricking topic of discussion in the article and thread.

quote:

In addition, most modern vehicles have backup cameras as well as BSIs, as standard equipment.


This means frick all if the vehicle is too big and runs over a pedestrian in a crosswalk or other road way.

Also, I linked an article that discusses an experiment was done with 18 children and a Yukon and none of the drivers could see them.

quote:

Cite some info from IIHS or other unbiased sources.


frick off. You have cited nothing and are just made at the conclusion. Do your own research.

Posted by jclem11
Chief Nihilist
Member since Nov 2011
9877 posts
Posted on 6/23/26 at 1:24 pm to
quote:

When was the last time you saw someone walking down the street and they weren't staring at their phone?


I see it on a weekly basis when I walk to get lunch. I work on a very busy 6 lane stroad with restaurants across the street from the office.

Many of us cross the street daily and pay attention to our surroundings. I see many drivers with their heads down and not checking to their right before turning right through a cross walk.

Posted by N2cars
Member since Feb 2008
39992 posts
Posted on 6/23/26 at 1:26 pm to
Sorry you have hurt feelings...





Maybe you'll get a good tip on your shift this afternoon.
Posted by jclem11
Chief Nihilist
Member since Nov 2011
9877 posts
Posted on 6/23/26 at 1:28 pm to
quote:

That doesn't say much for the average pedestrian or cyclist considering they are part of that same citizenry.


Agreed. However, automobile drivers are operating a deadly weapon and have a greater duty of care in this scenario.

You can only control what you can control and driving a comically large vehicle that you cannot safely operate is a bad choice to make as the maximum damage is much greater.

Limiting the size of vehicles is the best approach from an overall public policy perspective especially in urban envrionments.
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram