Started By
Message

re: Teen Tased By Trooper On Girlfriend's Porch

Posted on 6/23/21 at 10:18 am to
Posted by TDTOM
Member since Jan 2021
25893 posts
Posted on 6/23/21 at 10:18 am to
quote:

immediately ‘darted’ and hid in thick shubbery.


I must have missed this part.
Posted by chryso
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
13761 posts
Posted on 6/23/21 at 10:19 am to
Unless the cop gave him an order to continue typing on his phone he did not comply.
Posted by UGATiger26
Jacksonville, FL
Member since Dec 2009
9128 posts
Posted on 6/23/21 at 10:22 am to
Yikes...so much to unpack here.

Classic example of everyone being an idiot, but in the end, I can't say I blame the cop.

From what I can piece together from reading the story and watching the video, it sounds like the kid basically did everything he could to draw suspicion.

He's dressed in all black for starters, but whatever, that's not a crime; he can wear whatever he wants.

But if your girlfriend is inviting you over and you have reason to believe the cops are tailing you, why the frick are you going around to the back of the house? Knock on the front door like a normal person for goodness sake.

The trooper stated in his report that the kid "ducked into thick bushes" when he saw him. And if you watch the video, you can see why the trooper would've thought that...the pathway to the backyard is lined with thick shrubbery.

I would've been highly suspicious too if I were that cop.

This post was edited on 6/23/21 at 10:24 am
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
87372 posts
Posted on 6/23/21 at 10:24 am to
quote:

He was entering a home from the backyard and refused to cooperate with an officer.

Sure he may have had no ill intent, but just because he knows that doesn't mean the officer does, he just sees some kid dressed in all black entering a home from the backdoor. Very strange behavior.



He was no threat to anyone and made no threatening gestures. Nor was he "entering" the home. The cop could have stood there and continued to point a taser at a practically motionless teen who almost certainly had told him his girlfriend was coming to let him in.

If he'd rounded the corner and tased him, ok, maybe. But standing there with no action on either of their part and just tasing him because he wouldn't let you cuff him, when the teen was idle - is stupid.

Posted by Bigfishchoupique
Member since Jul 2017
9607 posts
Posted on 6/23/21 at 10:25 am to
“ the mother said he should have listened,but....”. Quote from news report.

He should have listened instead of ignoreingbthe cop and going with the “I dindu nuffin”.
This post was edited on 6/23/21 at 10:26 am
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
91527 posts
Posted on 6/23/21 at 10:25 am to
quote:

It's also the police officers right to arrest your arse by whatever method he deems necessary.
What was this guy getting arrested for?
Posted by kengel2
Team Gun
Member since Mar 2004
33735 posts
Posted on 6/23/21 at 10:25 am to
"frick You"

Bold move man, bold move.

Yall really need to turn the sound on the video.
This post was edited on 6/23/21 at 10:28 am
Posted by chryso
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
13761 posts
Posted on 6/23/21 at 10:26 am to
quote:

But standing there with no action on either of their part and just tasing him because he wouldn't let you cuff him, when the teen was idle - is stupid.


It is cool if people just refuse to comply as long as they are not acting aggressive? So as long as I don't appear threatening I can ignore anything cops say to me?
Posted by MMauler
Primary This RINO Traitor
Member since Jun 2013
24487 posts
Posted on 6/23/21 at 10:27 am to
So, he sees a cop and then runs to the back of the house. He gets on his phone and is texting someone. The cop has no idea what he's doing in someone's back yard, who he's texting, is there any of his friends around, and he refuses to comply with a lawful order given by the cop.

The scumbag mom is simply looking for her own payday. How about telling your scumbag kid to not act suspiciously around cops, do not run into the backyard of a home while you know a cop is looking at your OBVIOUSLY SUSPICIOUS behavior (who goes into someone's backyard to enter their house -- or even their own), and then completely disregarded the cop's REASONABLE demands while continuing to text on his phone. Could he have been alerting his friends to come and "help" him get away from this cop? The cop had no idea and acted MORE THAN APPROPRIATELY.

ETA: These were my exact thoughts and exactly what I would have posted if the kid was white. In fact, looking at the video, I thought that the kid was white. He looked white and his girlfriend looked white. His name is "Jack Rodeman" and not some black-sounding name. It wasn't until the very end when they showed a picture of him and his mom that I realized that he was mixed.
This post was edited on 6/23/21 at 10:32 am
Posted by Poule Deau Gravy
US of A
Member since Aug 2019
134 posts
Posted on 6/23/21 at 10:27 am to
It’d be hilarious and depressing to know how many bootlickers have a Gadsden sticker right next to their blue lives matter sticker
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
87372 posts
Posted on 6/23/21 at 10:29 am to
quote:

It is cool if people just refuse to comply as long as they are not acting aggressive? So as long as I don't appear threatening I can ignore anything cops say to me?



I don't advocate for ignoring the cops

I also don't advocate for dropping harmless teens presenting no threat onto pavement with a taser when the situation was under control and you could have waited 3 minutes to see if the girlfriend showed up as the kid claimed.
Posted by MoarKilometers
Member since Apr 2015
21128 posts
Posted on 6/23/21 at 10:30 am to
quote:

It’s against the law not to comply with a police officer’s instructions.

I believe there is a requirement of them being legally legal instructions not arguing these weren't, but there's definitely a line.
Posted by PotatoChip
Member since May 2014
5173 posts
Posted on 6/23/21 at 10:30 am to
Everyone knows you can’t text and drive.
Posted by chryso
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
13761 posts
Posted on 6/23/21 at 10:31 am to
quote:

you could have waited 3 minutes to see if the girlfriend showed up as the kid claimed.


Or his accomplices show up to shoot the cop. The cop doesn't know.
Posted by soccerfüt
Location: A Series of Tubes
Member since May 2013
74878 posts
Posted on 6/23/21 at 10:31 am to
quote:

The Trooper George Smyrnios was caught on surveillance video tasing 16-year-old Jack Rodeman more than once on the back deck of the teen’s girlfriend’s home, where he had permission to be.
This passes for 20121 "journalism".

"caught"? inflammatory & judgmental term

how about "displays"?

"where he had permission to be"

Again, judgmental with intent to influence the reader against the LEO.

The LEO did not know if the kid had permission.

Had this happened to one of my kids, I'd have told them something along the lines of "play stupid tricks, win stupid prizes".
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54853 posts
Posted on 6/23/21 at 10:32 am to
quote:

It’s against the law not to comply with a police officer’s instructions.


quote:

It's also the police officers right to arrest your arse by whatever method he deems necessary.


WTF is wrong with you people?
Posted by UGATiger26
Jacksonville, FL
Member since Dec 2009
9128 posts
Posted on 6/23/21 at 10:33 am to
quote:

I also don't advocate for dropping harmless teens presenting no threat onto pavement with a taser when the situation was under control and you could have waited 3 minutes to see if the girlfriend showed up as the kid claimed.


The problem with this is that it's all hindsight.

Yes, of course in hindsight the kid presented no threat (maybe), but there was no way that cop could've known that. shite, for all he knew the kid was texting a nearby armed accomplice.
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
87372 posts
Posted on 6/23/21 at 10:34 am to
quote:

Or his accomplices show up to shoot the cop. The cop doesn't know.



LOL

I'm sorry. I'm pro-police, but wild speculation is not justification for use of force. In a practical, street-wise sense, the kid probably had it coming for darting around.

But my position isn't premised on the poor kid, it's premised on my belief that cops should have to perceive a serious threat to use a taser. That wasn't present here.
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
91527 posts
Posted on 6/23/21 at 10:34 am to
Anyone who thinks this cop should have taxed this kid is a fricking moron
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
87372 posts
Posted on 6/23/21 at 10:35 am to
quote:

Yes, of course in hindsight the kid presented no threat (maybe), but there was no way that cop could've known that. shite, for all he knew the kid was texting a nearby armed accomplice.



This isn't a jihadi, using a cell phone is not, last I checked, a basis for perceiving imminent bodily harm.
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 29
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 29Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram