- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Supreme Blocks Biden Vaccine Mandate - updated with link
Posted on 1/13/22 at 1:55 pm to OMLandshark
Posted on 1/13/22 at 1:55 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
Good. We are winning, which is why while I’ve reached my breaking point, I think this country can still be salvaged and saved without violence. 2022 we take back Congress, 2024 we take back the Presidency, and between 2023 and 2025 we put Fauci, Daszak, Blinken, Miley, Garland, Weingarten, and Cuomo on trial and give them the appropriate sentence once convicted for ruining this country and world and the mass child abuse. They have to pay for what they’ve done to this country.
You know none of that will happen right
November will be a bloodbath, then we'll do very little, and then the cycle will repeat.
And the problem isn't politicians, the problem is the 100m+ Americans who will fluctuate between liberty and authoritarianism depending on how a pitch makes them feel. Times suck, which is why nobody has patience for lectures about imaginary voting suppression. Yet when the pendulum swings and times are good, suddenly the idiots who live among us will go "hey my 401k is doing good, you know what, we really should start stifling the productive classes and talking about BLM again."
1
Posted on 1/13/22 at 1:55 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
The libs were ALWAYS going to vote that way. Any politically charged case they never change and never waiver and always vote lockstep.
Kagen will occasionally dissent. i actually like reading her opinions when she dissents. she's similar to RBG, i rarely agree with her, but has a sharp mind.
Breyer is just a gaping vag and Sotomayor is a high functioning special person.
Posted on 1/13/22 at 1:56 pm to 3nOut
Does the mandate still apply to hospitals like ochsner?
Posted on 1/13/22 at 1:56 pm to bbvdd
frick yeah!
Melt COVIDIANS, melt
Melt COVIDIANS, melt
Posted on 1/13/22 at 1:57 pm to bbvdd
quote:
Posted on politics board as well
Is that the one where people go to talk politics and shite?
Awesome, great idea!
Posted on 1/13/22 at 1:57 pm to BeeFense5
quote:
Does the mandate still apply to hospitals like ochsner?
i believe if you receive federal funding, yes.
Posted on 1/13/22 at 1:57 pm to notiger1997
quote:
Damn I hope you are correct
Hope I'm not too optimistic, but when the CDC and media are suddenly going "you know what, we really need to get the truth out about COVID hospitalizations" and hitting the Sunday morning circuit to downplay the numbers, the tide is turning.
Granted, it's no mea culpa. Rather, it's turning because they're terrified that JB has a 33% approval rating, but turning nonetheless.
Posted on 1/13/22 at 1:59 pm to bbvdd
I agree Democrats are awful animals and belong in concentration camps, but this isn't the thread for name calling and threats. Happy for the ruling.
Posted on 1/13/22 at 1:59 pm to bbvdd
There was no way for them to achieve this. There aren’t enough tests available for people sick with covid, much less people who are fine and healthy who have to just take one to go to work.
Posted on 1/13/22 at 1:59 pm to bbvdd
Regardless of this particular case, the idea of setting precedent that OSHA can be used in such a way is horrifying. Glad court came to the right outcome- this was an absurd overreach, idgaf if this is about vax or not
Posted on 1/13/22 at 2:00 pm to Bayou_Tiger_225
quote:
I wonder if all of these work large companies will reverse their rules now?
They have the freedom to do what they want. Which was the point.
Your employer may or may not decide to issue a mandate for the vaccine. It’s their job to know how that will impact staffing. They are free to make a right or wrong choice either way now.
Posted on 1/13/22 at 2:01 pm to bbvdd
Roberts and Kavanaugh are both Bush guys who were on the DC Circuit before the Supreme Court. That is the resume of a consummate statist.
Posted on 1/13/22 at 2:02 pm to BeeFense5
quote:Wouldn't matter either way. Ochsner will require it for employees themselves, which has nothing to do with this ruling
Does the mandate still apply to hospitals like ochsner?
Posted on 1/13/22 at 2:03 pm to Mr Breeze
quote:
Is that the one where people go to talk politics and shite?
Awesome, great idea!
mini melt. i didn’t realize that forced vaccine mandates on private employers only effected those interested in politics. i’m a fricking moron.
Posted on 1/13/22 at 2:06 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
pproval rating, but turning nonetheless.
Heard someone mention the other day that the next step/talking point in turning the tide our way is to get this to be recognized as an endemic vs the scary pandemic nomenclature.
Not sure how that all comes into play, but just what someone on an industry call mention.
Posted on 1/13/22 at 2:08 pm to bbvdd
Sparky does not approve.
Sparky
@necromechwiz
·
2m
Replying to
@MorbidTheClown
@AP
and
@MelindaDeslatte
"Mah freedumbs!"
God, you are all so predictably the same.
Sparky
@necromechwiz
·
2m
Replying to
@MorbidTheClown
@AP
and
@MelindaDeslatte
"Mah freedumbs!"
God, you are all so predictably the same.
Posted on 1/13/22 at 2:08 pm to VolsOut4Harambe
quote:
ConZ is crying in his room right nowq
Bamahammock is fricking furious.
Posted on 1/13/22 at 2:09 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:quote:Why? The libs were ALWAYS going to vote that way. Any politically charged case they never change and never waiver and always vote lockstep.
6-3 is still frightening to me
It’s frightening because it’s a constant reminder that you have 3 justices that will constantly rule down party lines instead of based on law and the constitution. I may not agree with the other 6, but they at least will rule based on their interpretation of the law/constitution instead of just going along w the party lines
Posted on 1/13/22 at 2:09 pm to bbvdd
Court packing incoming!
Posted on 1/13/22 at 2:11 pm to kywildcatfanone
quote:
Court packing incoming!
Says no:
Page 3 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News