- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 7/21/26 at 11:14 am to TheFonz
quote:
There has been some unofficial rumblings about it. Musk has stated in the past that he foresees multiple launch sites along the Gulf in the coming years. It would be awesome of Louisiana did get one. Hell, I'd drive down there to watch them. It'll depend how how badly our politicians frick up the deal.
I get the feeling that it will be a recovery, fabrication, and/or testing location. Similar to NASA Michoud. Not necessary a launch site. Probably will have a small physical footprint and a massive buffer zone.
Regarding the politicians, SpaceX is well ahead of the game on this one. LA Legislators passed some very generous tax exemptions for Aerospace companies this past session. That's one of the main things sparking the Space X to Vermilion Parish rumors.
Posted on 7/21/26 at 11:17 am to Bigsweet
quote:
I was reading the Lake Charles Vs. Lafeyette comparison and two people pointed out Space X is coming to South Louisiana. I had heard they were looking at the Exon Property near Forked Island. Any truth to these roomers? If you know some facts or speculation you have heard, would love to hear it.
Oh yes. The world’s first and only trillionaire is renting a room in Lake Charles under the name Jaxton Baw in order to avoid the press.
Posted on 7/21/26 at 11:23 am to el Gaucho
quote:
Elon musk chose the name space x because it rhymes with his favorite type of intercourse
Wouldn't that be Space XXX?
Posted on 7/21/26 at 11:25 am to Bigsweet
Posted on 7/21/26 at 12:00 pm to Bigsweet
Everything I've seen says it is land currently owned by ExxonMobil. The site will be for launch and recovery. The primary launch targets will be the polar regions which are becoming more and more important on the geopolitical stage.
Posted on 7/21/26 at 12:02 pm to S
You guys remember when that dude killed that tree at Tumor's Corner?
Posted on 7/21/26 at 12:03 pm to WeeWee
Isn't he not a trillionaire anymore since the SpaceX stock has now plummeted?
This post was edited on 7/21/26 at 12:36 pm
Posted on 7/21/26 at 12:28 pm to UFFan
quote:
Isn't he not a trillionaire anymore since the SpaceX stock has now plummeted?
Yeah, now he’s only worth about 750 billion. I don’t know how he sleeps at night.
Posted on 7/21/26 at 12:38 pm to TheFonz
quote:
It would be awesome of Louisiana did get one.
Why stop at 1?
Posted on 7/21/26 at 1:02 pm to Bigsweet
I heard on the radio that the Vermillion Parish Rotary Club is having a meeting soon about potential Space X opportunities but they reiterated nothing is official it’s only exploratory discussions.
Posted on 7/21/26 at 1:25 pm to Bigsweet
Yes. Elon is buying up all the property in deep south LA next to the gulf. I know a family not wanting to sell but he has Elon money so it’s only a matter of time
Posted on 7/21/26 at 1:30 pm to JackDempsey
You would think with established waterways and sites for the previous space programs as well as our shipbuilding capabilities that space x would have interest here. Our politicians are provaly going to frick it up though
Posted on 7/21/26 at 1:39 pm to Bigsweet
(no message)
This post was edited on 7/21/26 at 8:23 pm
Posted on 7/21/26 at 1:42 pm to UFFan
Dude, they launch 90% of the mass the earth puts in orbit
Posted on 7/21/26 at 1:53 pm to UFFan
he can supply internet to the world
Posted on 7/21/26 at 3:07 pm to Bigsweet
(no message)
This post was edited on 7/21/26 at 3:39 pm
Posted on 7/21/26 at 3:26 pm to TeddyPadillac
quote:
makes sense. aren't they trying to capture their own natural gas to provide to the site down in texas b/c of the large quantities they use and having to transport it there? I'm sure it would be a hell of a lot easier and cheaper to do that in S. LA than in basically Mexico where Starbase is.
Not sure about there but west of there oil and natural gas is gone, depleted. Pipelines just like near Brownsville. But SpaceX could barge LNG from Cameron rather than build its own tinker toy LNG plant amounting to a natural gas nitrogen rejection unit
Posted on 7/21/26 at 3:33 pm to LSUsmartass
quote:
Lease owners started receiving notifications
As of last week, Vermilion Corp (which leases hunting rights from Exxon) hasn't heard from/can't get in touch with Exxon about this.
SpaceX also tweeted this indicating their interest in Vermilion parish
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Popular
Back to top



1






