Started By
Message

re: Social Security has 6 years left, cut benefits or raise taxes?

Posted on 3/20/26 at 12:52 pm to
Posted by Spankum
The Sip
Member since Jan 2007
62212 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 12:52 pm to
quote:

Social Security has 6 years left, cut benefits or raise taxes?



Honestly, I have been hearing this all my life. I never expected to collect SS, though I have paid social security taxes for a whole career.

I now see it as just another scare tactic by both parties.

It is a very common among politicians to try to make you believe that they are the only one that can save you.
Posted by LemmyLives
Texas
Member since Mar 2019
16079 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 12:53 pm to
quote:

contributed tons of money to this program and you (as a taxpayer) want to end it so that you don't have to pay up and do it right

3 fricking threads on the same shite. There is no "contribution." It's a tax that was distributed to those on SS before you even got your direct deposit.

I want it ended so my kids don't get stuck and taxed for the same empty, useless promises. I've been preparing for decades that SS will not be paying me any money in retirement. Everyone else should too.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
77260 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

3 fricking threads on the same shite. There is no "contribution." It's a tax that was distributed to those on SS before you even got your direct deposit.
This.

And as the population declines, the amount available falls.

Look to France if you want to see a society screwed over by these types of programs.
quote:

I want it ended so my kids don't get stuck and taxed for the same empty, useless promises. I've been preparing for decades that SS will not be paying me any money in retirement. Everyone else should too.
Exactly.
This post was edited on 3/20/26 at 12:56 pm
Posted by F1y0n7h3W4LL
Below I-10
Member since Jul 2019
4091 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 12:54 pm to
George W Bush was excoriated for bringing that up and am sure he wasn't the first.

Posted by LSUSports247
Member since Apr 2007
1062 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 12:55 pm to
If we’re going ti reduce SS for those that worked their whole lives then we should also cut the handouts for those that haven’t worked.
This post was edited on 3/20/26 at 12:56 pm
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
79936 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

Kill it entirely.

If the older generations didn’t plan well enough to survive without that Ponzi scheme, too bad
That would never be allowed. It'll get funded. Crack down on the fraud in SSDI and SSI.
Posted by LSUtoBOOT
Member since Aug 2012
20387 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 12:58 pm to
quote:

Gotta raise the minimum eligibility age too. should have privatized it back when GWB wanted to.

By that time the federal government had already stolen or misappropriated most of what should have been growing and supporting the future along with the ongoing 12.4% being siphoned from the working stiffs.
Posted by CatfishJohn
Member since Jun 2020
20241 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 1:07 pm to
quote:

Kill it entirely.

If the older generations didn’t plan well enough to survive without that Ponzi scheme, too bad.

quote:

Give me my money I've paid in for over 40 years plus interest first



^^^this

Either very slightly raise the SS withholdings on paychecks and raise the retirement age a couple years OR pay me my money with a lot of fricking interest.

Social security is one of those things I'm ok with though that goes against my other fiscal views. American culture sadly doesn't take care of our elderly like other countries. We'd have a lot of homeless and destitute old people out there.

If they move retirement age back a couple years and had a tiny increase in SS, I think we'd be covered for a very long time.
Posted by lsusteve1
Member since Dec 2004
47831 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 1:09 pm to
7 years from retirement
Posted by CatfishJohn
Member since Jun 2020
20241 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 1:09 pm to
quote:

Or what about cutting fraud, waste, and abuse?

Isn’t that was Elon was supposed to do? Whatever happened there?


He did what he wanted to do and the BBB destroyed it. We removed old waste and replaced it with new waste.
Posted by Midtiger farm
Member since Nov 2014
6161 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 1:11 pm to
quote:

, just like us were forced into that crap program.


They weren't forced - they could've reformed it or voted to do away with it

Need pull themselves up by bootstraps and deal with it

The program should start when your 80
Posted by Baers Foot
Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns
Member since Dec 2011
3913 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

I would give that all up for the sake of my child’s future and for them to never have to pay into it again.

Yall are some greedy fricks, IMO.


I wish the program would never have existed, but Scruffy's take in this thread is ridiculous.

186 million people paying into SSI aren't going to all agree to cut their losses and move on. We can't even agree on if dudes can use female bathrooms.

It will never happen, so why even throw it out as a hypothetical solution.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476637 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

Give refunds (with interest) to those who have been paying into for decades who haven’t reached retirement age yet


quote:

Social Security has 6 years left, cut benefits or raise taxes?


Give refunds with what money?
Posted by back9Tiger
Island Coconut Salesman
Member since Nov 2005
17958 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

They weren't forced - they could've reformed it or voted to do away with it


Who is they? I am talking about Boomers. If it was never brought up for a vote, how could they have reformed it?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476637 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 1:24 pm to
quote:

I am talking about Boomers. If it was never brought up for a vote, how could they have reformed it?

They've had decades to elect representatives to do this. Decades.
Posted by Loup
Ferriday
Member since Apr 2019
16968 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 1:25 pm to
quote:

I don't trust either party to get it right


they never do
Posted by Weekend Warrior79
Member since Aug 2014
21730 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 1:27 pm to
quote:

Without googling, tell me how much you think SS has vs estimates of fraud and abuse

The answer is less than pennies to the dollar

Are you suggesting that since it may be negligible, we should not concern ourselves with stopping it?
Posted by slidingstop
Member since Jan 2025
2295 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 1:30 pm to
quote:

f the older generation isn’t willing to sacrifice for the younger, they are a disgrace.


call me what you want, but I want every fricking penny I had confiscated from my income plus interest. It can be a lump sum, or it can be in installments. I never volunteered for this nor was I given a choice. Pretty sure I've been sacrificing for years.
Posted by Gravitiger
Member since Jun 2011
12449 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 1:40 pm to
quote:

It was never intended to operate this way, and never has. There is no "lockbox." What came out of your check on the 15th was sent to do someone on SS immediately. "Your money" was gone before your direct deposit even hit.
It was intended to, in the aggregate. It just never did, because realistically it never could, because there were people getting paid out after the first five years of SS taxes who never/barely paid in, and the investments never caught up like they were "supposed" to (I use that term ironically/facetiously). But no one literally thinks it's their own money in their own account set aside for them. Or at least I hope they don't.

The originators were also naive and didn't envision the complex system it became, with various categories of benefits based on age at retirement, qualifying spouses, etc. Originally it only paid out to the worker, and only at age 65, period. It was much simpler.

"Lockbox" doesn't refer to an individual account. It was Gore saying he wouldn't use SS money for any other budgetary purpose (of course, in the next sentence, he explained how it would be used for other budgetary purposes).
This post was edited on 3/20/26 at 1:57 pm
Posted by danilo
Member since Nov 2008
25699 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 1:41 pm to
Print more obviously
Jump to page
Page First 4 5 6 7 8 ... 26
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 26Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram