- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SB63 (St. George Parish-wide Vote Bill) LIVE STREAM Senate Committee
Posted on 5/9/19 at 11:55 am to Mahootney
Posted on 5/9/19 at 11:55 am to Mahootney
quote:
The fact that Central just incorporated doesn't matter. It's super unconstitutional now. because taxes.
oh many if they go for some racial desparate impact arguments this is going to be hilarious
4
Posted on 5/9/19 at 11:58 am to SlowFlowPro
Now she's testifying?
This post was edited on 5/9/19 at 11:59 am
Posted on 5/9/19 at 11:58 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:My understanding is that there isn't a racial screening when homes are bought or sold within EBR parish.
oh many if they go for some racial desparate impact arguments this is going to be hilarious
Please explain how it is racially desperate?
Posted on 5/9/19 at 11:58 am to bbrownso
She's testifying for herself?
Is she going to go back up to the chair and ask herself questions too?
Is she going to go back up to the chair and ask herself questions too?
Posted on 5/9/19 at 11:59 am to SlowFlowPro
"I started this bill because my constituents don't understand the law. Thank you."
Posted on 5/9/19 at 11:59 am to Mahootney
quote:
Please explain how it is racially desperate?
the loss of tax revenue is going to disproportionately affect minorities living in the city of BR, thus, the process is illegal
Posted on 5/9/19 at 11:59 am to SlowFlowPro
It would be awesome if the entire parish had to vote and voted for St. George. So many people I am speaking to in EBR think this entire thing stinks. They would vote for it just to crap on these politicians.
This post was edited on 5/9/19 at 12:00 pm
Posted on 5/9/19 at 11:59 am to Mahootney
All she has is simplistic understanding.
OMG. She's making a, "you didn't build that" argument.
Buahahahahaaa.
OMG. She's making a, "you didn't build that" argument.
Buahahahahaaa.
Posted on 5/9/19 at 12:00 pm to lsu13lsu
quote:
It would be awesome if the entire parish had to vote and voted for St. George. So many people I am speaking to in EBR think this entire thing stinks. They would vote for it just to crap on these politicians.
the problem with creating a movement around this issue is that it may have severe effects on other races
like
the Governor
Posted on 5/9/19 at 12:00 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
transgendered Matlock
Posted on 5/9/19 at 12:00 pm to ell_13
Wait so if people are against it in the proposed area can’t they vote against it?
Posted on 5/9/19 at 12:00 pm to SlowFlowPro
BILL HAS BEEN DEFERRED
Posted on 5/9/19 at 12:01 pm to tommy2tone1999
Boom?
Posted on 5/9/19 at 12:01 pm to SlowFlowPro
So the bill has been deferred...what exactly does that mean and when is it deferred to?
Posted on 5/9/19 at 12:01 pm to BilJ
I think that's it. The bill's deferred.
ETA: I think the technical meaning is that the committee hasn't voted one way or the other to send it back to the floor or kill it, but will revisit it in committee at a later time. Because it wasn't voluntarily deferred by the sponsor and a vote was held to involuntarily defer it against the sponsor's wishes, the people who voted to defer must vote to get it back on the schedule. Either way, if it ever makes it back on the schedule (and I think they may need a 2/3 majority, not a simple majority to reschedule), it comes in line behind all other instruments already in line to be heard by the committee.
I THINK.
If my understanding is right, the involuntary deferral effectively kills this bill because there's no way it'll be able to be heard by the committee and sent to the floor for debate and voting and conciliation between the chambers before the end of the legislative session or the vote to incorporate St. George happens.
I'm not a legislative scholar, though, just a dilettante, so if someone else understands better, give me a beatdown here.
ETA: I think the technical meaning is that the committee hasn't voted one way or the other to send it back to the floor or kill it, but will revisit it in committee at a later time. Because it wasn't voluntarily deferred by the sponsor and a vote was held to involuntarily defer it against the sponsor's wishes, the people who voted to defer must vote to get it back on the schedule. Either way, if it ever makes it back on the schedule (and I think they may need a 2/3 majority, not a simple majority to reschedule), it comes in line behind all other instruments already in line to be heard by the committee.
I THINK.
If my understanding is right, the involuntary deferral effectively kills this bill because there's no way it'll be able to be heard by the committee and sent to the floor for debate and voting and conciliation between the chambers before the end of the legislative session or the vote to incorporate St. George happens.
I'm not a legislative scholar, though, just a dilettante, so if someone else understands better, give me a beatdown here.
This post was edited on 5/9/19 at 12:13 pm
Posted on 5/9/19 at 12:01 pm to Brummy
Deferred means defeated?
Posted on 5/9/19 at 12:01 pm to tommy2tone1999
Is deferred a boom?
Posted on 5/9/19 at 12:01 pm to Brummy
Posted on 5/9/19 at 12:03 pm to rowbear1922
It means it will never leave committee. It's not technically dead, but the votes won't change.
Posted on 5/9/19 at 12:03 pm to ElectricWizard0
Deferred means its dead
Page 9 of 23
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News