- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Remember that video of the doctors that got censored?
Posted on 6/11/21 at 6:59 am to carhartt
Posted on 6/11/21 at 6:59 am to carhartt
quote:
She was just following the orders sent down from Democratic Overlord Nancy.
By banning it and using their celebrity to trash it in public, they were trying to influence the scientific process. IMO they are scum bags for doing that.
Posted on 6/11/21 at 7:18 am to Chicken
do you mean the fake theatrical show they will put on and then let another headline take over attention and never do anything about it???
Posted on 6/11/21 at 7:32 am to stout
quote:
Funny to see Spleen talking about the side effects of a drug that has been in use worldwide for over 50 years and is on the list of essential medicines by the WHO. I am sure by now we know the side effects but we couldn't have people cured so easily because then Trump would look like a savior and the virus couldn't be used politically.
Correction. They couldn’t have people cured so easily bc they needed many deaths to create hysteria and fear mongering to pull off their coup.
What’s funny is how after all that work to hurt him politically, he still kicked their asses in a landslide of epic proportions that it broke the whole scheme wide open for the whole world to see just how evil Democrats are. They only proved that they’re the enemy of the people. And while they may be vocal, their useful idiots are such a small number that they have had to use fraud to win elections for decades.
This post was edited on 6/11/21 at 7:33 am
Posted on 6/11/21 at 7:45 am to Wolfhound45
quote:
Can’t believe the media focused on the speaker and not the message. Amazing how they only do that for the “unapproved” narrative.
The media is fricking awful. One of the worst things about our country.
But you can’t have a literal crazy person as your spokeswoman. It’s common sense that it discredits your entire message.
That goes for anything.
Posted on 6/11/21 at 7:50 am to CatfishJohn
quote:
The media is fricking awful. One of the worst things about our country. But you can’t have a literal crazy person as your spokeswoman. It’s common sense that it discredits your entire message. That goes for anything.
It works great for Democrats with Crazy Nancy.
Posted on 6/11/21 at 8:06 am to The Spleen
quote:
You make it sound like they just made up the dangerous side effects, when in actuality studies started showing it had potentially dangerous side effects.
You mean the studies that later came out to be bullshite? Those studies?
So they did just make up the dangerous side effects.
Or are you talking about the couple in Arizona? Lol.
This post was edited on 6/11/21 at 8:23 am
Posted on 6/11/21 at 8:11 am to sgallo3
You keep posting that same article. Yet there are many other trials that show the drug worked. Many other doctors that used it with plenty of success.
But they did kill people. They lied about it not being effective and being dangerous then banned it. But just post your one article again,because it must be fact and there can't be anything out there with different evidence.
quote:
I agree with you up until "They killed people, the blood is on their hands"
But they did kill people. They lied about it not being effective and being dangerous then banned it. But just post your one article again,because it must be fact and there can't be anything out there with different evidence.
Posted on 6/11/21 at 8:12 am to dewster
quote:
Highly inappropriate especially if the patient is otherwise hopeless and asks for it.
Maybe so. I have no opinion on the state boards banning it. I was merely correcting the posted that said the federal government banned the prescribing of it. That didn't happen. In some states, the State Pharmacy Boards(non-political entities) banned pharmacists from filling prescriptions for it for Covid. If I recall there was some fear over some doctors/patients stockpiling it and there was concern there wouldn't by supply available for lupus and arthritis patients.
Posted on 6/11/21 at 8:13 am to The Spleen
quote:
the State Pharmacy Boards(non-political entities)
Everything is political
quote:
If I recall there was some fear over some doctors/patients stockpiling it and there was concern there wouldn't by supply available for lupus and arthritis patients.
We had secured 60 million pills in addition to the normal supply. Enough to treat over 50K COVID patients but go on with revisionist history
This post was edited on 6/11/21 at 8:15 am
Posted on 6/11/21 at 8:15 am to The Spleen
quote:
I have no opinion on the state boards banning it.
I’d be curious to know the political affiliation of states that banned it vs states that allowed it. I’m guessing the banned states are mostly gonna have a D by their names.
Posted on 6/11/21 at 8:16 am to The Spleen
quote:
sgallo3
HCQ isnt dangerous
quote:
The Spleen
potentially dangerous side effects
Maybe y'all should talk offline and get your shite straight because apparently the two of you don't agree even though you're on the same bullshite side.
Posted on 6/11/21 at 8:18 am to carhartt
quote:
I’d be curious to know the political affiliation of states that banned it vs states that allowed it.
Off hand, I know Ohio and Texas did. Another poster mentioned a YouTube of a Louisiana man not being able to get prescription filled.
Posted on 6/11/21 at 8:19 am to sgallo3
quote:
also thats an observational study with very small sample size and the study hasn't been peer reviewed.
Exactly. Let me know when the RCT shows similar results.
Posted on 6/11/21 at 8:20 am to The Spleen
quote:
the State Pharmacy Boards(non-political entities)
The second it was mentioned by Trump as looking promising, they started banning this.
It's political.
And if a dying patient wants to try it under the supervision of a doctor, let them. In June 2020 there was not much else out there to give them any kind of hope for a treatment.
Posted on 6/11/21 at 8:23 am to noonan
quote:
Maybe y'all should talk offline and get your shite straight because apparently the two of you don't agree even though you're on the same bullshite side.
I'm not on a side. I'm correcting some misinformation in this thread.
Posted on 6/11/21 at 8:23 am to The Spleen
quote:
You make it sound like they just made up the dangerous side effects
It's not like you could pick this up at your local drug store without a script. It was being prescribed to dying patients. And it's a known drug that has been used for years. The side effects were known.
There was concern that some people were going to hoard it though.
Posted on 6/11/21 at 8:25 am to Grasshopper
quote:
Part of the problem was the main spokesperson for their study believed in demon sex snd aliens caused infertility.
The Democrat party believes a woman can have a penis and a man can give birth.
Based on your logic, I shouldn't believe anything a Democrat says.
Posted on 6/11/21 at 8:32 am to MickeyLikesDags21
quote:
It absolutely blows my fricking mind.
I am honestly surprised by people who have had their "minds blown" by this stuff.
Once you understand you are dealing with evil people with no problem lying, stealing, and killing in the name of their leftest religion - everything they've ever done makes sense.
These people are not incompetent. They aren't stupid.
They are evil.
Posted on 6/11/21 at 8:35 am to CatfishJohn
quote:
The media is fricking awful
You'd think in the days of instant information available worldwide that news could be just the news, but somehow it got markedly worse and more untrustworthy.
Literally every headline by CNN has an ulterior motive behind it. Everyone. It's disgusting and disingenuous and an insult on the intelligent public.
Popular
Back to top



0





