dewster

quote:

---

My husband has a Rivian and the storage is awesome because there is a frunk and a trunk. But it’s useless for roadtrips.

---

Cybertruck is technically badass and stupid fast.....if only it looked totally different. Then I'd like it.

The new Tesla Y-L is a fantastic product.

Not quite there with retirement savings alone, but probably will be within a couple of years.

With RE equity and other assets (counting 529 plan for kids), I'm right under 1.1 million This milestone doesn't feel like I thought it would when I was 10 or 11 years old.

WTF was hoping I'd have a chance to buy a few more....it's back up to 125 now?

quote:

---

Passengers complaining how hard it is to climb into my lifted truck. I was thinking a Mazda CX3 or a Ford Focus.

---

Rented a Chevy Trax once. It's small, and I wouldn't want to drive across country in it. But it was a lot better and nicer than it had to be for a commuter. Chevy has quietly built a very good affordable car that undercuts the Corolla or Civic in price.

I hear similar things about the Ford Maverick too - It's no Cadillac, but it's much better than it has to be.

Model 3 is the GOAT but it's more expensive than the smaller ICE cars like the Sentra, Trax, or even a Corolla or Prius.

I think Meta has proven that Louisiana can land big investments that aren't related to Oil and Gas. That's valuable. That's important, and it's good for the state - especially if we can stand up enough natural gas generators to power these things.

But now that it's here.....I wouldn't go out of my way to encourage these to show up into the remaining premium industrial sites now that we have a few big ones already coming. They consume a massive amount of energy, and aren't particularly "jobs dense" like other industries are. That's not to say it isn't incredible for Richland Parish to land the largest data center of its type in the world.

To me.....Meta isn't a major game changer. But it is a hood ornament that is getting attention from the investors we REALLY need.

My logic: If SpaceX really is coming here, and we adjusted our liability laws around A&D.....I'd market those sites to a broad range of suppliers and fabricators within the A&D ecosystem. There's a lot of overlap with space and aero along with durable goods like automobiles, energy, helicopters, electrical component, semiconductors, or specialized equipment manufacturing.

If we play our cards right, we can use these data centers to land SpaceX, Space X to land the type of suppliers that overlap with other industries that normally pass Louisiana over for the midwest, Texas, or Florida.

I think this nuclear research initiative could be a game changer for whoever gets it - but even if that passes Louisiana over, I think Boeing, Raytheon, Lockheed, etc are also going to be looking at the state that landed the largest SpaceX site in existence. Not to mention Hyundai, General Motors, Caterpillar, John Deere, Sikorsky, Micron, Intel, etc. that need the high grade, specialized components from suppliers that don't yet exist here - but may likely set up some operations here to partner with SpaceX.

The "big wins" are great. But what we need are the support industries that overlap with and draw in other "big wins". We have a lot of great options for manufacturers of all sizes all over the state.

quote:

---

Shreveport with loop 3 before BR has loop 1

Theres are reason LA ranks 50th in everything

---

Shreveport metro GDP $27 Billion

Baton Rouge metro GDP $69 Billion

I'm not saying Shreveport shouldn't have good infrastructure. But Baton Rouge being this neglected when it comes to highway investment shows me how fricked our state's priorities are.

No

Most of the ones you listed are gorgeous. Salma Hayek in her prime and Scarlette Johansen are beautiful.

But if I said Anna Kendrick does it for me and I have no idea why.....half of y'all would give me shite, and the other half would nod in agreement. And I readily admit that there are better looking women that I encounter on a daily basis.

quote:

---

Do you have access to fun roads where you can actually get what you want out of the car.

---

Depends on the car. We have quiet roads here with some curves and even light elevation.

But using all of a 500 horsepower Camaro SS or 911’s capability: not around here. At least not on public roads.

MX-5 or used base level Boxter? Nissan Z or Audi TT? Yeah. Probably could get a lot out of those.

This would be a third vehicle for us.

I’ve always wanted a sports car but never actually bought one. Never thought I would get one.

I’m 41 now…. my wife (no pics) and I are thinking about getting a simple analog roadster as a “just for us” car — something like an MX-5 or maybe a used Boxster. Minimal creature comforts, manual, top down, fun on back roads. Impossible to fit kids inside it. Just a weekend machine that makes us smile.

We test drove one already and honestly both loved it.

It feels a little irrational for me… but at the same time, making memories with my wife while we’re still young enough to really enjoy it also feels pretty rational.

Curious what y’all think. I struggle with decisions like this, and I am definitely the kind of guy that doesn’t know how to vacation or have fun.

I can’t decide if I would regret this or not. I rented a convertible Mustang for a work trip recently and loved it….except for the softer body/suspension and automatic transmission.

quote:

---

That's what I said. Do you read?

---

You said this:

quote:

---

Every other city would either pussyfoot around or couldn't provide a tract with decent infrastructure or were unwilling to.

---

Cities don't typically broker deals like this. They don't provide land and they rarely own large plots typically desirable to private retail operations.