- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
OT Watch Board: Thoughts on the Omega Swatch Bioceramic MoonSwatch Collection
Posted on 3/22/23 at 7:38 am
Posted on 3/22/23 at 7:38 am
LINK
Junk or not bad for a sub $300 watch
I like the Mission To Jupiter version
Mission to the Moon looks like a real $6000 Omega Moonwatch
So does Mission to Mercury
The Mission to Uranus version looks a little "light in the loafers"
The rest:
Mission to the Sun
Mission to Venus
Mission to Earth
Mission to Mars looks like an '80s Swatch
Mission to Saturn
Mission to Neptune
Mission to Pluto
Posted on 3/22/23 at 7:40 am to stout
Junk. Colors have leaked onto people’s wrists, battery can’t be replaced, and pushers known to break/fall off.
Posted on 3/22/23 at 7:41 am to stout
Same as other poster, from what I’ve seen they are pieces of shite
Posted on 3/22/23 at 7:41 am to Free888
Well, that's disappointing. I was thinking about buying a few.
Posted on 3/22/23 at 7:44 am to stout
I've heard they feel like a McDonald's toy. Big hype over them though so they're still pricey for what you get.
Posted on 3/22/23 at 7:44 am to stout
I have a Speedy, kind of wanted one as a novelty, maybe would have bought one if available online. If you are looking for a watch and only want to spend $300, there are significantly better options.
Now that the novelty has faded, I’m not sure when it would get any wear in my collection. It is a Swatch, it is disposable by nature.
Now that the novelty has faded, I’m not sure when it would get any wear in my collection. It is a Swatch, it is disposable by nature.
This post was edited on 3/22/23 at 7:45 am
Posted on 3/22/23 at 7:44 am to stout
It’s easier to use my phone or Apple Watch.
Posted on 3/22/23 at 7:45 am to stout
Junk. Buy the whole collection and sell in 3 yrs. for double because one man's junk... something about treasure.
Posted on 3/22/23 at 7:45 am to stout
You done stepped in it now, baw
Posted on 3/22/23 at 7:45 am to stout
quote:
The Mission to Uranus version looks a little "light in the loafers"
Nah. That’s about the color I would expect for a watch called “mission to your anus”
Posted on 3/22/23 at 7:47 am to Ingeniero
quote:
I've heard they feel like a McDonald's toy
I have a Breitling Avenger made from Polymer that is light but you can still tell it is quality. Guess these aren't close to the same.
Posted on 3/22/23 at 7:50 am to Newc
quote:
If you are looking for a watch and only want to spend $300, there are significantly better options.
go on
Posted on 3/22/23 at 7:53 am to RATeamWannabe
Hamilton, Tissot, and Seiko are better at 300
This post was edited on 3/22/23 at 7:53 am
Posted on 3/22/23 at 7:54 am to stout
Last I remember, you can't get them at retail. They are only offered at the Swatch stores.
Posted on 3/22/23 at 7:56 am to stout
Pissed off every traditionalist and owners of the original (Manual Wind) moonwatch. Same as the difference between the Speedmaster Moon and the Speedmaster reduced.
Abomination of perhaps the greatest historical timepiece ever.
Abomination of perhaps the greatest historical timepiece ever.
This post was edited on 3/22/23 at 8:07 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News