Started By
Message

re: OT Watch Board: Thoughts on the Omega Swatch Bioceramic MoonSwatch Collection

Posted on 3/22/23 at 8:40 am to
Posted by RATeamWannabe
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2009
26018 posts
Posted on 3/22/23 at 8:40 am to
I'd have to look at the rest around that price point but I really like that one
Posted by Free888
Member since Oct 2019
3273 posts
Posted on 3/22/23 at 8:42 am to
quote:

I’m genuinely interested in hearing these options. I’m not doubting you, I just don’t know anything about watches.


If you look around you could find a watch in the Seiko Prospex line that would have an automatic movement and sapphire crystal for less tha $400. You can generally get them for 25% below retail without much effort.

Here’s an example
Posted by BigPapiDoesItAgain
Amérique du Nord
Member since Nov 2009
3473 posts
Posted on 3/22/23 at 8:48 am to
Several of them that I think are great. Closest I've come was last summer in Florence where I actually got to the counter, but all they had was Mission to Venus (Pink).

Hit up the Rome store several days - nothing, then the day they came in they had an elaborate queue system run by some of the guys out on the street. Didn't have the patience. I'll be hitting up the swatch boutiques in Paris, Lyon and Cannes in June and hope I can come away with either Mercury, Moon (especially the new Moondust one), Neptune, Pluto or Jupiter. I won't kill a bunch of time in a queue though.

I want it more for the historical value and how it fits in to the trajectory of the watch industry. I'm not a huge Omega fan, and have sold more than the one I currently own and almost never wear (Seamaster Pro Planet Ocean 2201.51 42 mm).
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
110949 posts
Posted on 3/22/23 at 8:51 am to
quote:

Hamilton, Tissot, and Seiko are better at 300



Hamilton and Tissot are also under the Swatch company.

I'm sort of surprised they would do this to the Omega brand.
Posted by tylerlsu2008
Monaco
Member since Jul 2015
1528 posts
Posted on 3/22/23 at 8:56 am to
quote:

Personally I'm going around to everyone I see wearing a Speedmaster and saying "hey cool Swatch!"


I would just say thanks and keep going. Real watch enthusiasts are buying to impress others.
Posted by Hu_Flung_Pu
Central, LA
Member since Jan 2013
22543 posts
Posted on 3/22/23 at 9:20 am to
It was supposed to create excitement in watches and be a gateway into luxury watches.
This post was edited on 3/22/23 at 9:22 am
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
110949 posts
Posted on 3/22/23 at 9:34 am to
I understand there was likely some "strategy" behind it. I'm still surprised.
Posted by Newc
Member since Feb 2017
398 posts
Posted on 3/22/23 at 9:34 am to
Mentioned earlier, but…

Seiko 5, particularly the new field watch
Orient Kamasu or Mako
Various micro brands
A G Shock
That new Scurfa
Posted by drexyl
Mingovia
Member since Sep 2005
23396 posts
Posted on 3/22/23 at 9:38 am to
G Shock Casioak models are really cool looking for $200.
Posted by BigPapiDoesItAgain
Amérique du Nord
Member since Nov 2009
3473 posts
Posted on 3/22/23 at 9:42 am to
quote:

Junk. Colors have leaked onto people’s wrists, battery can’t be replaced, and pushers known to break/fall off.



For what they are, I think one would be hard pressed to call them junk. Color leech only with Neptune, as far as I've seen, and battery is markedly easily changed with a readily available battery for replacement. I did see a post here and there about a pusher cover coming off, but I don't believe that to be a widespread issue, which I think is likely given the watch has continued to be wildly popular.

It serves some pretty clear purposes that I see (1) create foot traffic in Swatch Boutiques (2) source of revenue for the company from persons interested in the watch industry and where this fits in (3) recruit the FOMO crowd because there are some trendy and colorful offerings and it is affordable. Pretty clear marketing win for Swatch Group.
Posted by wallowinit
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2006
17708 posts
Posted on 3/22/23 at 9:49 am to
I don’t wear jewelry.
Posted by TopWaterTiger
Lake Charles, LA
Member since May 2006
12379 posts
Posted on 3/22/23 at 10:09 am to
quote:

I just looked on Tags website and you are looking at a quartz if it's around 1000.


yeah this would be for my senior son...evidently buying class rings is a thing of the past and the majority of the boys receive watches from their parents.

Not spending the money on a rolex or Omega at that age, but would consider entry level Tag or Hamilton. The Hamilton was nice looking watch, but made for "aviation" which we will likely never use.



I'd rather a water proof Tag.



Posted by Dragula
Laguna Seca
Member since Jun 2020
6811 posts
Posted on 3/22/23 at 10:12 am to
Plastic quartz wannabe Speedmaster...

PASS
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
63665 posts
Posted on 3/22/23 at 10:14 am to
quote:

I don’t wear jewelry.



You're the second person in this thread who has felt the need to tell us this. First of all, why not? Second of all, what compelled you to tell us this as if we care?
Posted by Meauxjeaux
102836 posts including my alters
Member since Jun 2005
46899 posts
Posted on 3/22/23 at 10:15 am to
My Stauer is accurate af
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
105295 posts
Posted on 3/23/23 at 11:13 am to
Interesting item on Chrono24. One of the custom Benrus alarm watches LBJ would give as presidential gifts. Only $5800.
LINK
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram