Started By
Message

re: Obamacare is Coming After Your Craft Beer

Posted on 6/3/16 at 10:52 am to
Posted by lsufan1971
Zachary
Member since Nov 2003
18165 posts
Posted on 6/3/16 at 10:52 am to
They should just ignore the new rule. that is what democrats do when they don't like something just say frick it.
Posted by JBeam
Guns,Germs & Steel
Member since Jan 2011
68377 posts
Posted on 6/3/16 at 10:52 am to
quote:

This is so stupid. People drinking craft beer aren't worried about counting calories. Those people drink Michelob Ultra.

While I don't think the gov't should be mandating this. Breweries should list the calorie count imho.
Posted by JumpingTheShark
America
Member since Nov 2012
22895 posts
Posted on 6/3/16 at 10:53 am to
Government should stay the frick out of business as much as they can. This is unnecessary.
Posted by ninthward
Boston, MA
Member since May 2007
20403 posts
Posted on 6/3/16 at 10:53 am to
OK so youre a small regulated business, you are already paying out the arse for healthcare for your employees and now you need another 77k to grow. This prevents growth, nothing more, of course any brewery wants to be in 150 locations.
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
73680 posts
Posted on 6/3/16 at 10:54 am to
quote:

my next question is why is putting calorie content on the label hurting small business?


Making them spend money on expenses that in no way help the product or consumer
Posted by The Sad Banana
The gate is narrow.
Member since Jul 2008
89498 posts
Posted on 6/3/16 at 10:55 am to
quote:

yes...the cost and if you don't do it, you can't have your beer in larger chains, which is generally high volume accounts for small breweries
Is it really a huge cost? Let's say it can be presented like most bottles...in small print on the back label. Is it as easy as retyping a template for the label? The labels will be printed anyway on future product.
quote:

No, not at all

which is why it is useless, unwarranted legislation
I see your point here and I'm not trying to be difficult. And I definitely think it's unwarranted...BUT, I don't mind having calorie content and other important nutrition facts, like added sugars, on the things we consume. Beer is basically like dessert, though...who cares how many calories are in it?
Posted by Paddyshack
Land of the Free
Member since Sep 2015
8220 posts
Posted on 6/3/16 at 10:55 am to
quote:

Don't come here with that type of logic

Logic? Where is the logic in our government trying to regulate shite like this exactly?

I'm pretty sure at this point this POS is trying to ruin as much shite as he can get his hands on before next January.
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
20883 posts
Posted on 6/3/16 at 10:55 am to
quote:

It is simply a tool to punish small business that is under all out assault as it is under this current administration, especially due to Obamacare.


I agree with you, but I have more faith in the market than in Obama. What I mean is people want craft beer. They will go to restaurants that have big selections. If a chain restaurant only has the big brand crap, they might be tempted to go elsewhere. Like my ETA from my previous post- ultimately this will hurt chain restaurants more than anything when they can only supply certain beers people want.
Posted by ninthward
Boston, MA
Member since May 2007
20403 posts
Posted on 6/3/16 at 10:56 am to
Something to the tune of 5-10k I see as reasonable, 77k seems a bit high.
Posted by Salmon
On the trails
Member since Feb 2008
83554 posts
Posted on 6/3/16 at 10:56 am to
quote:

Is it really a huge cost? Let's say it can be presented like most bottles...in small print on the back label. Is it as easy as retyping a template for the label? The labels will be printed anyway on future product.


bottle labels won't be that expensive, but reprinting cans is expensive

quote:

BUT, I don't mind having calorie content and other important nutrition facts, like added sugars, on the things we consume.


I don't mind it either

I just don't think it should be legislated
Posted by The Sad Banana
The gate is narrow.
Member since Jul 2008
89498 posts
Posted on 6/3/16 at 10:56 am to
Also, the government will then have to define "craft beer" for us and that could be fun.
Posted by lsu2006
BR
Member since Feb 2004
39980 posts
Posted on 6/3/16 at 10:57 am to
quote:

I'm pretty sure at this point this POS is trying to ruin as much shite as he can get his hands on before next January.


Yes. He actually sent a memo to the FDA instructing them to "ruin a buncha shite" to piss off the OT.
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
140106 posts
Posted on 6/3/16 at 10:57 am to
Since we don't enforce immigration laws, I don't see why this government intrusion should be given any consideration. Just ignore it like our current President does when he feels like it.
Posted by Paddyshack
Land of the Free
Member since Sep 2015
8220 posts
Posted on 6/3/16 at 10:58 am to
quote:

Yes. He actually sent a memo to the FDA instructing them to "ruin a buncha shite" to piss off the OT.


so you're Team Hilary?
Posted by Rouge
Floston Paradise
Member since Oct 2004
136798 posts
Posted on 6/3/16 at 10:58 am to
"provide the caloric information"

easy enough to do on the company website with a link to certified testing results

labeling is not a cost factor, from what I am reading

rabblerabblerabble
Posted by LSUBoo
Knoxville, TN
Member since Mar 2006
101917 posts
Posted on 6/3/16 at 10:58 am to
quote:

Also, the government will then have to define "craft beer" for us and that could be fun.



Nah, this applies to all brewers.

I guess probably not to imported beer though? Or will they start having to put nutrition info in order to export to the US?

And if they are going to do this, why not wine and spirits as well? Why just the beer industry?
Posted by The First Cut
Member since Apr 2012
13966 posts
Posted on 6/3/16 at 10:59 am to
quote:

you can afford it.


If you're a business earning 15% OP, then you need $513,333 in revenue just to pay for this. And why do we need this? Because Obama thinks you aren't smart enough to realize that there are calories in alcohol.

Posted by snake23
NOLA/BR
Member since Dec 2011
4438 posts
Posted on 6/3/16 at 10:59 am to
How would this regulation affect beers on tap? It's not like they're gonna have to start laser engraving pint glasses with nutritional labels. And even small craft brewers currently label their bottles/cans anyway. All they would have to do is add a nutritional section to the label. It shouldn't affect the price they already pay for printing the labels. It's it's a design issue. The only financial impact I see is from potential loss of business by choosing not to comply with the regulation.
Posted by NoHoTiger
So many to kill, so little time
Member since Nov 2006
45735 posts
Posted on 6/3/16 at 10:59 am to
quote:

BUT, I don't mind having calorie content and other important nutrition facts, like added sugars, on the things we consume.

This is nice. But it should not be mandated. If I want to know how many calories are in my craft beer, then I go to the website and look it up. If I bottle beer and want to add it to the label, that's my call to make. OR if my consumers want that information, then I'll add it to appease them. I should not be appeasing the government or facing penalties.
Posted by CidCock
Member since Sep 2007
Member since Feb 2011
8631 posts
Posted on 6/3/16 at 10:59 am to
quote:

Since we don't enforce immigration laws, I don't see why this government intrusion should be given any consideration. Just ignore it like our current President does when he feels like it.





:golfclap:
Jump to page
Page First 3 4 5 6 7 ... 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram