- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 8/11/22 at 8:54 am to SPEEDY
quote:
Officials also claim a crowd of 500 people arrived for the party, accusing the family of promoting the event on social media, which was prohibited
Shocking
Posted on 8/11/22 at 8:55 am to SPEEDY
Sista on bottom right finna eat
This post was edited on 8/11/22 at 8:56 am
Posted on 8/11/22 at 9:10 am to SPEEDY
For fricks sake, ITS NOT ABOUT YOUR SKIN COLOR. Christ almighty.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 9:23 am to SPEEDY
I've heard recently that some malls do not allow minors without an adult to enter their malls. I wonder why ?
I have read accounts of large family reunions at a local park have ended on a sour note after several of the family members pulled and fired their guns at other family members.
Perhaps these large gatherings are only a catalyst for emotional fueled violence to erupt and the park owner is concerned for a viable business model for their enterprise in the near future ?
Also if all 500 of those people jump in the pool at the same where will that water go ?
I have read accounts of large family reunions at a local park have ended on a sour note after several of the family members pulled and fired their guns at other family members.
Perhaps these large gatherings are only a catalyst for emotional fueled violence to erupt and the park owner is concerned for a viable business model for their enterprise in the near future ?
Also if all 500 of those people jump in the pool at the same where will that water go ?
This post was edited on 8/11/22 at 9:25 am
Posted on 8/11/22 at 9:23 am to Pettifogger
quote:Imagine how many possible drownings.
imagine how many lifeguards would be needed for this
Lifeguards would be busier than a one legged man in an arse kicking contest.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 9:27 am to Klark Kent
quote:
how can that be proved?
I’m this case, I don’t believe it can. I was saying hypothetically their actions could have been racially motivated, but the other party broke rules that give them every right to cancel, no matter what the family is claiming.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 9:29 am to c on z
quote:
well the family in the video even says that they brought their own security
Yeah, if a family tells me they need to bring their own security to a birthday party, then I'm going to cancel their shite as a business owner.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 9:33 am to Kafka
quote:
Named after which Lee?
It's important
Dr. Pleasant John Graves Lea
seriously.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 9:33 am to slowmoe
quote:Extra popularity at school for being the guy who threw the biggest party of the year.
Why do you need that many people at a party?
Park should’ve just let the first 250 in then had security block entry after. Let it backfire on the party host when their close friends/family get turned away because they weren’t in the first 250 in line. Have a bunch of the 250 spots taken by people they may not even know who came because they saw the party promoted on social media
Posted on 8/11/22 at 9:41 am to SPEEDY
The latest.
quote:
The following is a summary of our investigation. On July 8, the renting party booked Summit Waves for a teen birthday party scheduled for Saturday, August 6 from 7:30 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. and indicated 250 attendees. According to the rental forms, the event would not be publicized via social media, and fees would not be charged to attend the event. It has been our experience, that social media marketing and/or ticket sales have the potential to increase event attendance beyond the number initially stated and can result in insufficient staffing and security. The “no” answers provided on the form by the booking party did not create concerns. The rental form indicated that 10 – 15 chaperones would be in attendance and per the rental form, security consisting of officers from the Lee’s Summit Police Department or Jackson County Sheriff’s office is required. The cost of security is paid by the rental party but is arranged and booked by LSPR. Through our investigation, LSPR found that staff failed to arrange security for the event. On the evening of Thursday, August 4, Summit Waves staff was made aware of a social media post advertising an event called “Splash Blast 2” from 7 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. at Summit Waves. On the morning of Friday, August 5, Summit Waves staff called the renting party, left a message inquiring about the social media post, and requested a return call. LSPR did not receive a return call. On Saturday, August 6, Summit Waves staff received approximately 15 calls from parents with questions (cost, hours, parent attendance, etc.) about “Splash Blast 2” and the safety of the event. Summit Waves staff called the renting party two additional times on August 6 to address concerns. LSPR made the decision to cancel the event at 5 p.m. due to the inability to contact the renting party. Safety pertaining to the anticipated crowd size and the potential impact it might have on party guests and the staff was the sole reason for the cancellation. The renting party returned the phone call to Summit Waves staff at approximately 5:30 pm. They were notified at that time of the cancellation and that LSPR would provide a full refund. The renting party arrived around 6:15 pm at which time LSPR staff reiterated the event was canceled. Staff and police stayed on-site until the crowd dispersed at approximately 8 p.m. Lee’s Summit Police estimated the crowd to be approximately 500 people between 7 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. On Sunday, August 7, LSPR was made aware of a disturbing social media post made by a part-time Summit Waves lifeguard. At approximately 10 a.m. on Monday, August 8, the administrator of Parks and Recreation contacted the renting party and apologized for the poor experience the family received on Saturday night. In addition, the administrator apologized for the inappropriate and insensitive language used by staff including the social media post and advised that appropriate actions would be taken with staff. The administrator identified the internal processes that broke down and reassured the renting party that the rental cancellation was due solely to safety issues associated with potential crowd size. A refund was completed that afternoon and an offer was made to cover any additional expenses associated with the rental beyond the rental fee. The administrator and the rental party agreed to a follow-up phone call on Wednesday, August 10 to continue discussions.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 9:41 am to SPEEDY
500 people at a water park?
Higher number of casualties? Drownings or shootings?
Higher number of casualties? Drownings or shootings?
Posted on 8/11/22 at 9:51 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
I wish anytime something didn’t go my way I could claim it was due to discrimination because of my race.
And RIGHT there is where the true privilege lies.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 9:54 am to SPEEDY
quote:
the park failed to properly prepare extra security for the event
Suh-kur-tee!
That's how I read it.
This post was edited on 8/11/22 at 10:04 am
Posted on 8/11/22 at 10:01 am to Tiger Prawn
quote:
Park should’ve just let the first 250 in then had security block entry after. Let it backfire on the party host when their close friends/family get turned away because they weren’t in the first 250 in line. Have a bunch of the 250 spots taken by people they may not even know who came because they saw the party promoted on social media
Oh, you mean and then let them get all riled up and rowdy and start breaking shite and tearing shite apart like we see all the time?
That measly 2k won’t mean shite after the damage that crowd would cause. Not to mention no one else wants to be around that shite.
It’s a lose-lose situation. Best bet is just to not get their business
Posted on 8/11/22 at 10:07 am to SPEEDY
The same folks who subscribe to critical race theory where whiteness is inherently evil do not believe that attributes cannot be assumed of their race.
They want it both ways.
They want it both ways.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 10:08 am to nes2010
quote:
The latest.
Yeah…none of that matters because, muh Racists!!
Posted on 8/11/22 at 10:24 am to nes2010
quote:
t approximately 10 a.m. on Monday, August 8, the administrator of Parks and Recreation contacted the renting party and apologized for the poor experience the family received on Saturday night. In addition, the administrator apologized for the inappropriate and insensitive language used by staff including the social media post and advised that appropriate actions would be taken with staff. The administrator identified the internal processes that broke down
Huge mistake. Should have never apologized or admitted some kind of fault.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 10:26 am to SPEEDY
The snow flake race
Posted on 8/11/22 at 10:38 am to lsu13lsu
I want to know what the lifeguard said. It was probably funny and true
Page 4 of 5
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News